@phdthesis{Le2013,
  author    = {To Luong Le},
  title     = {Urban Green Areas – their functions under a changing lifestyle of local people, the example of Hanoi},
  journal    = {St{\"a}dtische Gr{\"u}nfl{\"a}chen - ihre Bedeutung f{\"u}r die Bev{\"o}lkerung im sozialen Wandel, am Beispiel von Hanoi},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-001591-3},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Hanoi is a rapidly developing city - in terms of area, population and economy. It also has to face social and environmental problems that often accompany the fast development of a city. Increasing environmental pollution leads to a decrease in living conditions, such as clean water, housing, social services, etc., for most of the city’s inhabitants. Other well-known social problems in cities worldwide also occur in Hanoi nowadays, for example inequality, food supply, and unemployment. In addition, the society is altering; lifestyle- change is a permanent process. Today, it seems that the changing process in Asian countries is rather leap-frogging than continuously. Although many research projects concerning to urban green areas in Hanoi have been completed recently, less is known about utilization of parks\&gardens in a practical and systematic way. This study aims at contributing to fulfills the gaps with up-to-date facts and figures of parks’ utilization in the inner city of Hanoi. Based on “grounded theory”, triangular methodology was applied to collect empirical data in four main parks in the inner city of Hanoi namely: Thong Nhat, Bach Thao, Hoan Kiem, and Lenin. Scientific observations, visitor countings were done in 2010-2011; including 2143 face-to-face interviews to park users covering the course of the year and a small online-poll of 113 responses. Thirteen interviews with experts have been done in several phases and taken into account for discussing and testing hypotheses. Empirical results have shown that utilization of the parks is in abundance in terms of the use - numbers as well as activities. A comparison between the courses of the day for parks in Berlin and Hanoi shown that the time of using parks in Hanoi is earlier in the day. In details, there is 25\% and 1.4\% of total daily visitors went to parks in Hanoi and Berlin,, respectively. However, the biggest peak in park-visiting time for both cities is in the afternoon. The findings also clarified that students and retirees are the major users even though there is some different in structures of park user among the four parks. The length of stay depends on how large and interesting a park is. In this aspect, Hanoi parks are very poor in facilities showing by a long list of missing facilities in the parks. However, as there is no alternative, parks in Hanoi still attract a high number of visitors. In general, results from this study have shown a close relationship among socio-economic and political situations in Vietnam with UGAs and its utilization. Influencing factors on parks’ utilization were also indentified, which are social changes, lifestyle changes, economic situation, conflicts in land usage, and maintaining cost for UGAs. Three given hypotheses were confirmed: i) the demand of public UGAs in inner Hanoi will grow mid-term and increase strongly long-term; ii) Hanoi’s residents will claim strongly for more parks in the future; ii) The number of conflicts inside the area of UGAs, among the visitors will occur very soon and require a specific master plan for the development and the management of UGAs. Finally, based on the weaknesses of UGAs in Hanoi recently, two groups of recommendations were also suggested to improve UGAs. Firstly, in terms of quality – quantity: • Retain each square meter of green space as UGA – do not unblock any green space for construction; • The existing UGA have to be well maintained. Secondly, in terms of management – planning: • Elaborate a UGA-masterplan for (inner) Hanoi; • Keep UGA management in the responsibility of public bodies; • Implement participation of affected population defector in the process of planning and management (as it has already been written in planning guidelines); • Be aware of potential conflicts among park user groups; • Establish an UGA monitoring system – involving regular (or even permanent) countings based on up-to-date technology; Realize horizontal partnering structures.},
  language  = {en}
}