@phdthesis{vanGils2019,
  author    = {Henk Jasper van Gils},
  title     = {On How Practical Identities Form a Successful Guide for Practical Deliberation: Unification and Exploration as Ideal},
  journal    = {Praktische Identit{\"a}ten als erfolgreicher Leitfaden f{\"u}r praktische Deliberation: Vereinheitlichung und Exploration als Ideale},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-33725},
  pages     = {153},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {We all know the experience of different demands on ourselves. As a parent, we want to be there for our children, and in pursuit of our career, we want to invest as much time as possible. If we are committed to both being a good parent and pursuing a career, it may be impossible to satisfy the demands stemming from both commitments. It is in such moments in which our, what I call, practical identities are conflicted that our will is in a state of volitional disunity. In this dissertation, I discuss how a person may best cope with volitional disunity. I define practical identities in line with Christine M. Korsgaard as self-descriptions under which a person finds her life worth living and her actions worth undertaking; examples of such self-descriptions are being a parent, an employee, a hobbyist pianist, the friend of Charlotte, etc. Practical identities provide the person with ideals that form a decision-making framework for her deliberations about what to do. The standard analysis of volitional disunity, is that it causes a person to not know what to do as her identities, as guides, point her in conflicting, even opposite, directions. The solutions proposed in the literature always include, what I call, the Unification Ideal: a person has to prioritize her identities by deciding which is more important to her. By unifying her identities in this way, she constitutes who she is and wants to be thereby providing herself with a clear decision-making framework regarding the question of what to do. In this dissertation however, I argue that a person does not need to overcome her volitional disunity through unification per se. In order to know what to do, a person could also explore the disunity that defines her will, which includes that she could accept the volitional disunity as hers. I base this Exploration Ideal on two assumptions about human nature: 1) we have inner responses to how we act and 2) we are opaque to ourselves. Since a person cannot always know in advance whether she will be happy with a commitment by turning her attention inwards, she can explore who she wants to be and who she can be through the bodily, psychological, and emotive responses she has to her actions. These responses, however, are not the ultimate authority. This authority stays with her practical identities in light of which she can evaluate these inner responses. Thus, a person exposed to volitional disunity should strive to explore this disunity, how she wants it to define her and whether it is constitutive of who she is (Exploration Ideal) instead of trying to overcome the disunity by striving for unification (Unification Ideal).},
  language  = {en}
}