@phdthesis{Eusemann2010,
  author    = {Pascal Eusemann},
  title     = {Population genetics and reproduction biology of Populus euphratica Oliv. (Salicaceae) at the Tarim River, Xinjiang Province, NW China},
  journal    = {Populationsgenetik und Reproduktionsbiologie von Populus euphratica Oliv. (Salicaceae) am Tarim, Provinz Xinjiang, NW China},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-000783-2},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {To uncover the genetic structure of Populus euphratica forests along the Tarim River in Xinjiang, China, a PCR set of eight microsatellite markers was established. 18 primer pairs originally developed for P. tremuloides and P. trichocarpa were screened for amplification in P. euphratica. The eight most variable loci were selected for further genotyping experiments. Subsequently, two multiplex PCR assays, each containing four loci, were set up and optimized. Three populations containing altogether 436 trees were used to characterize the selected loci. The set was found to be moderately polymorphic (mean expected heterozygosity = 0.57). The resolution was sufficient to discriminate even siblings with high confidence (PID = 1.81x10-5). Cumulative exclusion probabilities were 0.89 (single parent), 0.98 (paternity), and 1.00 (parent pair) and proved the set’s suitability for parentage analysis. Practical and theoretical analysis of consequences of genotyping errors in this semi-clonal plant showed that the vast majority of errors (62.1\%) lead to division of identical genotypes. Merging of different genotypes was found to be a very rare case (0.4\%). This always leads to an overestimation of genotypes. A similarity threshold of one allele difference between two genotypes to be regarded as being identical lead to an underestimation of clonal richness and genotype number of one per cent compared to an overestimation of more than 20 per cent without such a threshold. Allowing a certain amount of variation is therefore expected to reflect the clonal structure better than an analysis that considers exact matches only. Using a combination of morphological and molecular analyses, a first study demonstrated that root suckers are clearly distinguished from seedlings in their root architecture. Root suckering starts when trees are 10–15 years old and bridges distances of up to 40 m at a time. Root suckers depend on their parent tree for at least five years and are expected to have a higher mortality than generatively grown trees. Molecular analysis of old growth stands revealed a highly variable proportion of clonal growth between different stands. In the study area, the proportion of clonality decreases with distance to the main river bed (R = 0.31 at the site closest to the main river, R = 0.97 at the site farthest away from the river). An analysis of the history of river movements at different sites indicates a dependency of clonal growth on the frequency of ground water replenishment by the yearly floods. Genetic differentiation among the stands in the study area is low (FST = 0.055), and isolation by distance was not detectable (P = 0.058). Also, the river does not function as a vector for directed gene flow in downstream direction (P > 0.11). The forests are therefore considered to be one large panmictic metapopulation with unrestricted gene flow. Clonal growth does not lead to higher final stand densities (P = 0.99) and is obviously not of crucial importance for stand survival. Furthermore, analysis of vitality measures and size differences indicate that root suckers are in disadvantage both in vitality and in survival rate compared to seedlings. In this light, a possible function of clonal growth as a luxury strategy to enhance a genetic individual’s reproduction success under good site conditions can be discussed. The genetic structure of the (meta)population bears direct implications for management and conversation of the Tugai forest in Xinjiang. Due to the low degree of differentiation and the unhindered gene flow even small, fragmented, or isolated populations have conservational value, thereby clearly answering the SLOSS question (a single large or several small protected areas) in the latter sense. More than that, non-clonal stands with the highest amount of genotypic diversity can be easily identified on satellite and aerial images. Selection of such stands for conservation is therefore possible without expensive and time-consuming molecular analyses.},
  language  = {en}
}