@phdthesis{Schaefer2021,
  author    = {Alexander Sch{\"a}fer},
  title     = {Functional analyses of porcine T-cell responses upon viral infections–Lessons learned from pigs as natural hosts and biomedical models–},
  journal    = {Funktionelle Analysen porziner T-Zell-Antworten bei viralen Infektionen–Erkenntnisse aus Schweinen als nat{\"u}rliche Wirte und biomedizinische Modelle–},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-45198},
  pages     = {195},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Viral diseases are a threat to bacteria and enormous animals alike. Vaccines are available against several viruses. However, for some viruses, like ASFV, we still lack vaccines, while for others, like IAV, they are not as effective as we need them to be. To a large extent, this is because we do not fully understand the mechanisms conferring antiviral immunity. To improve our understanding of antiviral immunity, we used a model species that is in many immunological aspects closer to humans than the widely used laboratory mice, pigs. In this thesis, pigs were investigated as a potential biomedical model species for viral respiratory infections in humans and as a natural host for viral infections. Both approaches provide valuable insights into aspects of porcine immunology that can either be used as the foundation for translational research or for the design of targeted therapeutics and vaccines for pigs. Insights into fundamental characteristics of the porcine immune system form the basis for translational studies. Paper I pioneered a detailed characterization of porcine iNKT cells. To make pigs and porcine iNKT cells more available for scientific investigations, we established multicolor flow cytometry analysis platforms that allow for a more detailed investigation of these cells than previously possible. We found porcine iNKT cells circulating in peripheral blood to be a rare population among CD3+ lymphocytes that displays a pre-activated effector state and can be divided into at least three functional subsets. Upon antigenic activation, they proliferated rapidly, secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines, and exerted cytotoxicity. Moreover, we provided first evidence for a role of iNKT cells in porcine IAV and ASFV infections, which we investigated in more detail in paper IV. Central characteristics, i.e., phenotype and functional properties, exhibit a high degree of similarity between humans and pigs. Moreover, differences between human and murine iNKT cells are more pronounced than between humans and pigs. Based on the results obtained in paper II, the established biomedical model could be used for further studies of infectious respiratory diseases. IAV infections pave the way for secondary co-infections with increased morbidity and lethality. These bactoviral co-infections are a threat to both pigs and humans. The shared susceptibility as well as homologies on the physiological and immunological level make pigs exceptionally suitable animal models for studies of these infections. Paper I and II can also be interpreted under translational aspects. Activation of iNKT cells in porcine vaccination studies showed promising results. Based on these and our findings, this might be a suitable approach for humans as well. Along with other studies, our results suggest that pigs might be a well-suited large animal model for research in infectious diseases. This is true especially for respiratory infections, such as seasonal IAV infections, for which pigs are natural hosts and contribute to viral spread and emergence as “mixing vessels”, which can result in pandemic strains like H1N1pdm09. We could show that porcine iNKT cells as well as the antiviral responses of cTC against H1N1pdm09 in pigs are comparable to human cells and processes. The increased implementation of pigs in basic and applied research might enable an improved translation of scientific knowledge to human and veterinary medicine. In two further studies, papers III and IV, we investigated T-cell responses during a viral infection, ASF, for which pigs are the only natural hosts. Immune responses were similar after highly and moderately virulent ASFV infection in domestic pigs and wild boar, respectively. However, they differed between both species. Antiviral immunity in domestic pigs was predominantly exerted by αβ T cells, CD8α+ and DP αβ T cells, while the response in wild boar was dominated by γδ T cells, mainly CD8α+ effector cells. Since wild boar show a higher disease severity and lethality, even during infection with moderately virulent ASFV “Estonia2014”, a shift to γδ T cells seems to be detrimental. In contrast, domestic pigs survive infections with moderately virulent ASFV “Estonia2014”, which indicates that CD8α+ or DP αβ T cells confer protection at least in infections with non-highly virulent ASFV strains. Interestingly, in paper V we found higher and prolonged inflammation in domestic pigs, correlating with increased T-cell influx. However, histopathological analyses revealed no direct explanation for the differences in disease progression and lethality in domestic pigs and wild boar. These findings require further studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. The lack of basic data about immunological differences between domestic pigs and wild boar hampers attempts to understand immunity against ASFV. We found differences between both suid subspecies already at steady state and even more prominent during ASFV infections in papers III-V. Most apparently, T-cell responses in wild boar were heavily biased towards γδ T cells, while immune responses in domestic pigs were based on αβ T cells. However, information about even basic characteristics, like the composition, phenotypes, and functional qualities of wild boar’s immune system, is missing. Therefore, essential baseline data must be obtained in order to adequately assess changes in future studies. Analyses like these reveal major advantages of pigs as a biomedical model. On the one hand, similar to conventional model species, researchers can investigate every tissue at any desired time. Tissue from human patients is often scarce or not at all available, so models that can be investigated at specific times after infection are needed. On the other hand, results obtained in pigs are more comparable to humans than data from murine studies. Moreover, pigs are susceptible to similar pathogens as humans and experimental infections can be investigated without the need for major genetic manipulations. However, there are also limitations of the porcine model system. Analysis tools are not as advanced as they are for mice, especially in terms of availability of mAbs or genetically modified organisms. Still, given the major advantages that become more and more obvious, efforts should be made to make pigs more applicable for basic and translational research. In addition, findings derived from pigs can be used for the species itself. Pigs are a major livestock species and new treatments, or vaccines could also be used for them. Therefore, this research could eventually also improve animal welfare. In summary, the presented thesis significantly enhanced our knowledge of porcine immune processes for cTC in general and iNKT cells in particular. Results were obtained both at steady state and in the context of IAV and ASFV infections, and thus, made pigs more available as a model for future research. The use of multicolor flow cytometry provided a broad overview of the ongoing immune reactions and enables further, more wide-ranging studies that can also address open questions in even more complex infection scenarios.},
  language  = {en}
}