@phdthesis{Elsholz2011, author = {Alexander Elsholz}, title = {Regulation of protein quality control systems in low GC, Gram-positive bacteria}, journal = {Regulation von Proteinqualit{\"a}tssystemen in Gram-positiven Bakterien mit niedrigen GC-Gehalt}, url = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-000971-9}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Protein quality control systems are essential for the viability and growth of all living organisms. They protect the cell from irreversible protein aggregation. Because the frequency of protein misfolding, which ultimately results in protein aggregation, varies with the environmental conditions, the amount and activity of protein quality systems have to be accurately adapted to the rate of protein misfolding. The main goal of this thesis was to gain detailed molecular insights into the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of these protein quality control networks in the ecologically, medically and industrially important phylum of low GC, Gram-positive bacteria. In these bacteria the core protein quality control systems are under the transcriptional control of the global repressor CtsR. In a first study it was demonstrated that the arginine kinase McsB is not responsible for the regulation of CtsR activity during heat stress, as was concluded by others on the basis of previous in vitro data. Rather, it was demonstrated that CtsR acts as an intrinsic thermosensor that adapts its activity to the surrounding temperature. CtsR displays a decreased DNA binding at higher temperatures, which leads to induction of transcription of the protein quality control systems under these conditions. This CtsR feature is conserved in all low GC, Gram-positive bacteria. However, the CtsR proteins of various low GC, Gram-positive species do not have the same temperature optima. CtsR responds to heat in a species-specific manner according to their corresponding growth temperature. Detailed analysis revealed that a highly conserved tetra-glycine loop within the winged helix-turn-helix domain of CtsR is responsible for thermosensing. Dual control of CtsR activity during different stresses was demonstrated for the first time in this work. In addition to heat-dependent de-repression, CtsR is inactivated by thiol-specific stress conditions. This latter de-repression depends on a molecular redox-switch that is independent of CtsR auto-regulation. In Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives the McsA/McsB stress-sensing complex is responsible for CtsR de-repression during redox stress conditions. McsA is able to sense the redox state of the cell via its highly conserved cysteine residues. When these cysteines are reduced, McsA is able to bind and inhibit McsB. But when these cysteine residues are oxidized, McsB is released from McsA. Thereby, McsB is activated and removes CtsR from the DNA. However, the McsA/McsB complex is not present in all low GC, Gram-positive bacteria. In the species lacking this complex, ClpE is able to act as a redox-sensor probably via its highly conserved N-terminal zinc finger domain. When these cysteine residues are oxidized, ClpE is activated which results in CtsR de-repression. In addition to the transcriptional regulation of CtsR low GC, Gram-positive protein quality control systems are regulated post-transcriptionally. The expression of the McsA/McsB adaptor pair is regulated by CtsR. However, McsB activity is also tightly regulated by three different regulatory proteins (McsA/ClpC/YwlE). McsB is needed to target specific substrates to ClpC, either for refolding or degradation by the ClpCP protease. It was demonstrated that only the auto- phosphorylated form of McsB is able to bind to its substrates. This McsB function is inhibited in non-stressed cells by a direct interaction with ClpC. Consequently, McsB is activated by a release from ClpC during protein stress. In addition, McsB activation depends on the presence of its activator McsA. Accordingly, McsB cannot be activated as an adaptor protein during thiol-specific stress because McsA is no longer able to bind to McsB under these conditions. However, also active McsB is subject to post-translational control. Activated McsB is either de-phosphorylated by McaP or degraded by ClpCP ensuring an appropriate shut-down of the McsB adaptor. Both McaP and ClpC inhibit McsB activity with different intensities. ClpC possesses a stronger impact on McsB activity than McaP but both proteins are needed for an adequate silencing of McsB activity. In addition, it was shown for the first time that B. subtilis McsB is a global adaptor that influences the stability of multiple proteins. The B. subtilis ClpC protein is unlike most members of the Hsp100 family because it not only requires several adaptor proteins for substrate recognition but also for its general ATP- dependent activity. Biochemical analysis revealed how ClpC is activated by distinct adaptor proteins. McsB modulates ClpC activity by regulatory phosphorylation of arginine residues. Moreover, McaP (formerly YwlE) was identified as an arginine phosphatase that modulates the McsB mediated ClpC activity. MecA, another known adaptor protein for ClpC, activates ClpC independently of these arginine phosphorylations, which demonstrates the existence of multiple pathways for ClpC activation.}, language = {en} }