@phdthesis{Holtz2018,
  author    = {Katharina Holtz},
  title     = {Defensive mobilization, autonomic arousal, and brain activation during interoceptive threat in high and low anxiety sensitive individuals},
  journal    = {Defensive Mobilisierung, autonome Erregung und Hirnaktivierung w{\"a}hrend interozeptiver Bedrohung bei hoch und niedrig angstsensitiven Personen},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-21434},
  pages     = {105},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The fear of somatic sensations is highly relevant in the etiology and maintenance of various disorders. Nevertheless, little is known about this fear of body symptoms and many questions are yet unanswered. Especially physiological studies on interoceptive threat are rare. Therefore, the present thesis investigated defensive mobilization, autonomic arousal, and brain activation during the anticipation of, exposure to, and recovery from unpleasant body sensations. Symptoms were provoked using a standardized hyperventilation procedure in a sample of high (and as controls: low) anxiety sensitive individuals - a population high at risk for developing a panic disorder and high in fear of internal body symptoms. In study one, anxious apprehension was investigated during anticipation of interoceptive threat (somatic sensations evoked by hyperventilation) and exteroceptive threat (electric shock). Symptom reports, autonomic arousal, and defensive mobilization assessed by the startle eyeblink response were analyzed. Extending the knowledge on anticipation of interoceptive threat, study two investigated the neural networks activated during anxious apprehension of unpleasant body sensations. Symptom reports and startle response data were collected during a learning session after which participants high and low in fear of somatic symptoms attended a fMRI session anticipating threat (hyperventilation – learned to provoke unpleasant symptoms) or safety (normal breathing). Study three examined the actual exposure to internal body symptoms, investigating symptoms reports, autonomic arousal, and the startle eyeblink response during guided breathing (hyperventilation and, as a non-provocative comparison condition, normoventilation) and during recovery. And finally, study four addressed changes in the defensive mobilization during repeated interoceptive exposure via a hyperventilation procedure. High and low anxiety sensitive persons went through two guided hyperventilation and normoventilation procedures that were spaced one week apart while symptom reports, breathing parameters, and startle response magnitudes were measured. In study one it was demonstrated that the anticipation of exteroceptive threat led to a defensive and autonomic mobilization in high and low anxiety sensitive individuals, while during interoceptive threat only high anxiety sensitive participants were characterized by a potentiated startle response and autonomic activation. Imaging data of study two revealed that 1) during anticipation of hyperventilation all participants were characterized by an increased activation of a fear network consisting of anterior insula/ orbitofrontal cortex and rostral parts of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/ dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, 2) high fear individuals showed higher anxious apprehension than low fear controls during the entire context (safe and threat conditions), indexed by an overall stronger activation of the described network, and 3) while low fear controls learned that (undisclosed to all participants) in the fMRI scanner the threat cue was not followed by an unpleasant hyperventilation task, high fear participants continued to show stronger fear network activation to this cue. In study three it was demonstrated, that the hyperventilation procedure led to a marked increase in somatic symptoms and to autonomic arousal. While high and low anxiety sensitive groups did not differ during hyperventilation, in the early recovery only high anxiety sensitive individuals showed defensive mobilization, indicated by potentiated startle response magnitudes, and increased autonomic arousal after hyperventilation as compared to after normoventilation. Substantiating these findings, in study four all participants reported more symptoms during hyperventilation than during normoventilation, in both sessions. Nevertheless, only high anxiety sensitive participants displayed a potentiation of startle response magnitudes after the first hyper- vs. normoventilation. One week later, when the exercise was repeated this potentiation was no longer present and thus both groups no longer differed in their defensive mobilization. Even more, the number of reported baseline symptoms decreased from session one to session two in the high-AS group. While high anxiety sensitive persons reported increased baseline anxiety symptoms in session one, groups did not anymore differ in session two. These data indicate that the standardized hyperventilation procedure is a valid paradigm to induce somatic symptoms. Moreover, it induces anxious apprehension especially in persons highly fearful of internal body symptoms. The repetition of interoceptive exposure, however, reduces associated fear in highly fearful individuals. Thus, this paradigm might provide an innovative method to study anxious apprehension and also treatment effects in patients with panic disorder. The present findings are integrated and discussed in the light of the current literature.},
  language  = {en}
}