Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)
  • search hit 5 of 9
Back to Result List

Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, wenn Sie dieses Dokument zitieren oder verlinken wollen: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-32825

Efficacy of Different Carrier Gases for Barrier Discharge Plasma Generation Compared to Chlorhexidine on the Survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Embedded in Biofilm in vitro

  • Because of its antimicrobial properties, nonthermal plasma could serve as an alternative to chemical antisepsis in wound treatment. Therefore, this study investigated the inactivation of biofilm-embedded Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 by a surface barrier-discharged (SBD) plasma for 30, 60, 150 and 300 s. In order to optimize the efficacy of the plasma, different carrier gases (argon, argon admixed with 1% oxygen, and argon with increased humidity up to approx. 80%) were tested and compared against 0.1% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) exposure for 600 s. The antimicrobial efficacy was determined by calculating the difference between the numbers of colony-forming units (CFU) of treated and untreated biofilms. Living bacteria were distinguished from dead by fluorescent staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Both SBD plasmas and CHG showed significant antimicrobial effects compared to the untreated control. However, plasma treatment led to a higher antimicrobial reduction (argon plasma 4.9 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, argon with admixed oxygen 3 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, and with increased gas humidity 2.7 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> after 300 s) compared to CHG. In conclusion, SBD plasma is suitable as an alternative to CHG for inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa embedded in biofilm. Further development of SBD plasma sources and research on the role of carrier gases and humidity may allow their clinical application for wound management in the future.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author: R. Matthes, N.-O. Hübner, C. Bender, I. Koban, S. Horn, S. Bekeschus, K.-D. Weltmann, T. Kocher, A. Kramer, O. Assadian
URN:urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-32825
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1159/000353861
ISSN:1660-5527
ISSN:1660-5535
Pubmed Id:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24434726
Parent Title (English):Skin Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher:S. Karger AG
Place of publication:Basel, Switzerland
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of first Publication:2014/01/16
Release Date:2020/10/08
Tag:Antimicrobial; Atmospheric pressure plasma; Biofilm; Dielectric barrier discharge; Surface barrier discharge plasma source; Wound management
GND Keyword:-
Volume:27
Issue:3
First Page:148
Last Page:157
Faculties:Universitätsmedizin / Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin
Licence (German):License LogoUrheberrechtlich geschützt