Thomas Platz, Katharina Kaiser, Tina Laborn, Michael Laborn

• Objective: To assess the effects of a two-week course of intensive impairment-oriented arm rehabilitation for chronic stroke survivors on motor function. Methods: An observational cohort study that enrolled chronic stroke survivors (≥6 months after stroke) with mild to severe arm paresis, who received a two-week course of impairment-oriented and technology-supported arm rehabilitation (1:1 participant–therapist setting), which was carried out daily (five days a week) for four hours. The outcome measures were as follows: the primary outcome was the arm motor function of the affected arm (mild paresis: BBT, NHPT; severe paresis: Fugl-Meyer arm motor score). The secondary outcomes were measures of finger strength, active ROM, spasticity, joint mobility/pain, somatosensation, emotional distress, quality of life, acceptability, and adverse events. Results: One hundred chronic stroke survivors (≥6 months after stroke) with mild to severe arm paresis were recruited. The training was acceptable (drop-out rate 3%; 3/100). The clinical assessment indicated improved motor function (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.36–0.49; n = 97), reduced spasticity/resistance to passive movement, and slightly improved joint mobility/pain and somatosensation. The technology-based objective measures corroborated the improved active range of motion for arm and finger joints, reduced finger spasticity/resistance to passive movement, and the increased amount of use in daily life, but there was no effect on finger strength. The patient’s emotional well-being and quality of life were positively influenced. Adverse events were reported by the majority of participants (51%, 49/97) and were mild. Conclusions: Structured intensive impairment-oriented and technology-supported arm rehabilitation can promote motor function among chronic stroke survivors with mild to severe arm paresis and is an acceptable and tolerable form of treatment when supervised and adjusted by therapists.