Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, wenn Sie dieses Dokument zitieren oder verlinken wollen: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-126249
Quantifying ecosystem services of rewetted peatlands − the MoorFutures methodologies
- In 2011, MoorFutures® were introduced as the first standard for generating credits from peatland rewetting. We developed methodologies to quantify ecosystem services before and after rewetting with a focus on greenhouse gas emissions, water quality, evaporative cooling and mire-typical biodiversity. Both standard and premium approaches to assess these services were developed, and tested in the rewetted polder Kieve (NE-Germany). The standard approaches are default tier 1 estimation procedures, which require little time and few, mainly vegetation data. Based on the Greenhouse gas Emission Site Type (GEST) approach, emissions decreased from 1,306 t CO2e in the baseline scenario to 532 t CO2e in the project scenario, whereas 5 years after rewetting they were assessed to be 543 t CO2e per year. Nitrate release assessed via Nitrogen Emission Site Types (NEST) was estimated to decrease from 1,088 kg N (baseline) to 359 kg N (project), and appeared to be 309 kg N per year 5 years after rewetting. The heat flux − determined with Evapotranspiration Energy Site Types (EEST) – decreased from 6,691 kW (baseline) to 1,926 kW (project), and was 2,250 kW per year 5 years after rewetting. Mire-specific biodiversity was estimated to increase from very low (baseline) to high (project), but was only low 5 years after rewetting. The premium approaches allow quantifying a particular ecosystem service with higher accuracy by measuring or modelling. The approaches presented here have been elaborated for North-Germany but can be adapted for other regions. We encourage scientists to use our research as a model for assessing peatland ecosystem services including biodiversity in other geographical regions. Using vegetation mapping and indicator values derived from meta-analyses is a cost-efficient and robust approach to inform payment for ecosystem services schemes and to support conservation planning at regional to global scales.
| Author: | Franziska TannebergerORCiD, Augustin BerghöferORCiD, Kristina Brust, Jenny Hammerich, Bettina Holsten, Hans JoostenORCiD, Dierk Michaelis, Fiedje Moritz, Felix Reichelt, Achim Schäfer, Aaron ScheidORCiD, Michael TrepelORCiD, Andreas Wahren, John CouwenbergORCiD |
|---|---|
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-126249 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112048 |
| ISSN: | 1470-160X |
| Parent Title (English): | Ecological Indicators |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| Place of publication: | Amsterdam |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Date of Publication (online): | 2024/05/07 |
| Date of first Publication: | 2024/06/01 |
| Release Date: | 2025/01/24 |
| Tag: | Bioindication; Greenhouse gas emission; Organic soil; Peatland restoration; Proxy |
| Volume: | 163 |
| Article Number: | 112048 |
| Page Number: | 10 |
| Faculties: | Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Botanik und Landschaftsökologie & Botanischer Garten |
| Collections: | Artikel aus DFG-gefördertem Publikationsfonds |
| Licence (German): | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 International |

