Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- - (1)
- Alloimmune thrombocytopenia (1)
- NOD/SCID mouse model (1)
- Thrombocytopenie (1)
- characterization of patients (1)
- clinical decision-making (1)
- decision regret (1)
- prostate cancer (1)
- radical prostatectomy (1)
- survey (1)
Institute
Publisher
- MDPI (1)
Since its introduction in 2006, the NOD/scid mouse model has greatly contributed to the understanding of the pathomechanisms of antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia. This progress has however been hampered by inter-laboratory differences. With this work, we make several suggestions to minimise these differences:
We suggest that human platelets (blood group 0) be injected into the mice (age- and sex-matched, 8-16 weeks) via the tail vein. For antibody injection, scientists may choose between intraperitoneal and tail vein injection, each of which has strengths and drawbacks. In case of low antibody titer or low avidity antibodies, preincubation of the platelets with the patient serum prior to injection promotes platelet elimination where standard protocols fail. For subsequent sample preparation, we found that newly-launched ready-to-use kits present a good alternative to classical density gradient centrifugation by reducing man-hours and turnover time without affecting the quality of flow cytometry analysis.
In a second part, we used the revised mouse model to study anti-CD36 mediated thrombocytopenia in vivo. Anti-CD36 antibodies have been suggested as frequent case for FNAIT in Asia. The mechanisms behind this remain partly unclear. After injecting anti-CD36 monoclonal antibody or anti-CD36 patient immunoglobulin into the system, circulating human platelets were rapidly cleared. Interestingly, the polyclonal patient immunoglobulins used were not uniform in their anti-platelet reactivity. On further examination, we found that the anti-CD36 antibodies induce platelet activation and aggregation, which we were able to inhibit by the addition of an Fcγ-receptor blocking agent. This suggests a possible role for Fcγ-receptor in the activation and elimination process.
As our results from the experiments on the role of complement in the elimination process are however ambiguous, further studies are needed. The clinical relevance of anti-CD36 antibody-mediated platelet activation and aggregation for the high abortion rates in affected women has yet to be evaluated.
Simple Summary
This multicenter study investigated the extent of patient’s decision regret (PatR) in patients with prostate cancer comparing different surgical modalities. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has replaced open radical prostatectomy as the surgical standard of care in many countries worldwide. However, a broad scientific basis evaluating the difference in patient-relevant outcomes between both approaches is still lacking. In this context, PatR is increasingly moving into the scientific focus. Our study shows a critical PatR in slightly more than one third of patients about 15 months after surgery. Patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery, and also patients without postoperative urinary stress incontinence, report significantly lower PatR. Likewise, this difference was also demonstrated for patients who decided together with their treating physician on the specific surgical procedure (consensual decision making). Our study helps to further establish PatR as an important endpoint in the setting of radical prostatectomy and identifies criteria which may be addressed to reduce PatR.
Abstract
Patient’s regret (PatR) concerning the choice of therapy represents a crucial endpoint for treatment evaluation after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCA). This study aims to compare PatR following robot-assisted (RARP) and open surgical approach (ORP). A survey comprising perioperative-functional criteria was sent to 1000 patients in 20 German centers at a median of 15 months after RP. Surgery-related items were collected from participating centers. To calculate PatR differences between approaches, a multivariate regressive base model (MVBM) was established incorporating surgical approach and demographic, center-specific, and tumor-specific criteria not primarily affected by surgical approach. An extended model (MVEM) was further adjusted by variables potentially affected by surgical approach. PatR was based on five validated questions ranging 0–100 (cutoff >15 defined as critical PatR). The response rate was 75.0%. After exclusion of patients with laparoscopic RP or stage M1b/c, the study cohort comprised 277/365 ORP/RARP patients. ORP/RARP patients had a median PatR of 15/10 (p < 0.001) and 46.2%/28.1% had a PatR >15, respectively (p < 0.001). Based on the MVBM, RARP patients showed PatR >15 relative 46.8% less frequently (p < 0.001). Consensual decision making regarding surgical approach independently reduced PatR. With the MVEM, the independent impact of both surgical approach and of consensual decision making was confirmed. This study involving centers of different care levels showed significantly lower PatR following RARP.