Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Phylogeny (2) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
The goal of this thesis was to study the systematic relationships within the superfamily Sylvioidea (Aves: Passeriformes) in general and within the closely related families Acrocephalidae and Locustellidae in particular, by means of DNA sequences. Sylvioidea itself and families therein were the focus of many studies based as well on morphological characters as on DNA. Due to their morphological similarity and their presumably rapid radiation most studies failed to solve relationships between sylvioidean families and also demarcations of single families and relations within are still in progress. In this study, an enlargement of previous datasets, both taxa and number of DNA sequences, and more sophisticated analysis methods were used to improve the resolution in Sylvioidea, Acrocephalidae and Locustellidae. In addition, the applicability of barcoding in Acrocephalidae was tested. The monophyly of Sylvioidea could be supported and the families Paridae and Remizidae, which were sometimes still included, clustered among the outgroup taxa. Four families, Nicatoridae, Panuridae, Alaudidae, and Macrosphenidae constitute basal splits within Sylvioidea. The division of the former sylviid/timaliid clade in five families, Sylviidae, Leiothrichidae, Pellorneidae, Timaliidae, and Zosteropidae was supported. Scotocerca, Erythrocercus, and Hylia, previously supposed to be members of Cettiidae, were shown not to belong to this family. As the three genera are also morphologically and ecologically different, they were here proposed to be elevated to family rank, Scotocercidae, Erythrocercidae and Hyliidae, respectively. The family Acrocephalidae consisted of the four genera, Nesillas, Acrocephalus, Hippolais, and Chloropeta. In the analysis for this thesis, the latter three appeared to be non-monophyletic. One Acrocephalus species, A. aedon was sister to a clade containing four species of Hippolais as well as two out of three Chloropeta species. They were all merged in the genus Iduna, based on the DNA evidence and shared morphological and ecological characters. Iduna had priority over Hippolais or Chloropeta according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The one remaining Chloropeta species (C. gracilirostris) had to be renamed to Calamonastides as Chloropeta was no longer available for this taxon. Seven genera were included in the re-analysis of the family Locustellidae: Locustella, Bradypterus, Megalurus, Dromaeocercus, Schoenicola, Cincloramphus, and Eremiornis. Apart from the monotypic genera Dromaeocercus and Eremiornis and Schoenicola, of which only one species was included, the remaining genera were found to be non-monophyletic. One clade contained all Locustella species, Megalurus pryeri and all Asian/Oriental Bradypterus species. All species in this clade were synonymized with Locustella, as the type species of Locustella was included, whereas the type species of Bradypterus fell in a different clade. Therefore, the remaining African Bradypterus species retained their genus name, and Dromaeocercus was renamed to Bradypterus as it clustered within Bradypterus. Cincloramphus, intermingling with the remaining Megalurus species, was synonymized with the latter. Barcoding, growing in popularity for delimiting species, was tested in its applicability for Acrocephalidae. Fourteen taxa currently recognized as full species would fall under the 2% threshold of sequence divergence proposed for delimiting species using the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. It was also shown that it is important to clarify which part of a DNA sequence is used, as different parts can give different results regarding the 2% threshold. In addition, the choice of “complete deletion” or “pairwise deletion” in calculating genetic distances is important, if incomplete are sequences used.
Background
Pycnogonida (sea spiders) is the sister group of all other extant chelicerates (spiders, scorpions and relatives) and thus represents an important taxon to inform early chelicerate evolution. Notably, phylogenetic analyses have challenged traditional hypotheses on the relationships of the major pycnogonid lineages (families), indicating external morphological traits previously used to deduce inter-familial affinities to be highly homoplastic. This erodes some of the support for phylogenetic information content in external morphology and calls for the study of additional data classes to test and underpin in-group relationships advocated in molecular analyses. In this regard, pycnogonid internal anatomy remains largely unexplored and taxon coverage in the studies available is limited.
Results
Based on micro-computed X-ray tomography and 3D reconstruction, we created a comprehensive atlas of in-situ representations of the central nervous system and midgut layout in all pycnogonid families. Beyond that, immunolabeling for tubulin and synapsin was used to reveal selected details of ganglionic architecture. The ventral nerve cord consistently features an array of separate ganglia, but some lineages exhibit extended composite ganglia, due to neuromere fusion. Further, inter-ganglionic distances and ganglion positions relative to segment borders vary, with an anterior shift in several families. Intersegmental nerves target longitudinal muscles and are lacking if the latter are reduced. Across families, the midgut displays linear leg diverticula. In Pycnogonidae, however, complex multi-branching diverticula occur, which may be evolutionarily correlated with a reduction of the heart.
Conclusions
Several gross neuroanatomical features are linked to external morphology, including intersegmental nerve reduction in concert with trunk segment fusion, or antero-posterior ganglion shifts in partial correlation to trunk elongation/compaction. Mapping on a recent phylogenomic phylogeny shows disjunct distributions of these traits. Other characters show no such dependency and help to underpin closer affinities in sub-branches of the pycnogonid tree, as exemplified by the tripartite subesophageal ganglion of Pycnogonidae and Rhynchothoracidae. Building on this gross anatomical atlas, future studies should now aim to leverage the full potential of neuroanatomy for phylogenetic interrogation by deciphering pycnogonid nervous system architecture in more detail, given that pioneering work on neuron subsets revealed complex character sets with unequivocal homologies across some families.