Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (6)
Language
- English (6)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- - (5)
- Blood supply (1)
- Demographic change (1)
- FcγRIIa (1)
- MHC class I (1)
- PF4 (1)
- Red blood cell concentrates (1)
- aPF4/H antibodies (1)
- antigen presentation (1)
- anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies (1)
Institute
Publisher
- Wiley (3)
- MDPI (1)
- S. Karger AG (1)
One of the most common mutations in the serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) gene is the N34S variant which is strongly associated with chronic pancreatitis. Although it is assumed that N34S mutation constitutes a high-risk factor, the underlying pathologic mechanism is still unknown. In the present study, we investigated the impact of physiological stress factors on SPINK1 protein structure and trypsin inhibitor function using biophysical methods. Our circular dichroism spectroscopy data revealed differences in the secondary structure of SPINK1 and N34S mutant suggesting protein structural changes induced by the mutation as an impairment that could be disease-relevant. We further confirmed that both SPINK1 (KD of 0.15 ± 0.06 nM) and its N34S variant (KD of 0.08 ± 0.02 nM) have similar binding affinity and inhibitory effect towards trypsin as shown by surface plasmon resonance and trypsin inhibition assay studies, respectively. We found that stress conditions such as altered ion concentrations (i.e. potassium, calcium), temperature shifts, as well as environmental pH lead to insignificant differences in trypsin inhibition between SPINK1 and N34S mutant. However, we have shown that the environmental pH induces structural changes in both SPINK1 constructs in a different manner. Our findings suggest protein structural changes in the N34S variant as an impairment of SPINK1 and environmental pH shift as a trigger that could play a role in disease progression of pancreatitis.
Abstract
Platelets are small anucleate blood cells with a life span of 7 to 10 days. They are main regulators of hemostasis. Balanced platelet activity is crucial to prevent bleeding or occlusive thrombus formation. Growing evidence supports that platelets also participate in immune reactions, and interaction between platelets and leukocytes contributes to both thrombosis and inflammation. The ubiquitin‐proteasome system (UPS) plays a key role in maintaining cellular protein homeostasis by its ability to degrade non‐functional self‐, foreign, or short‐lived regulatory proteins. Platelets express standard and immunoproteasomes. Inhibition of the proteasome impairs platelet production and platelet function. Platelets also express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. Peptide fragments released by proteasomes can bind to MHC class I, which makes it also likely that platelets can activate epitope specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). In this review, we focus on current knowledge on the significance of the proteasome for the functions of platelets as critical regulators of hemostasis as well as modulators of the immune response.
Abstract
Background
Heparins are usually produced from animal tissues. It is now possible to synthesize heparins. This provides the abilities to overcome shortages of heparin, to optimize biological effects, and to reduce adverse drug effects. Heparins interact with platelet factor 4 (PF4), which can induce an immune response causing thrombocytopenia. This side effect is called heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We characterized the interaction of PF4 and HIT antibodies with oligosaccharides of 6‐, 8‐, 10‐, and 12‐mer size and a hypersulfated 12‐mer (S12‐mer).
Methods
We utilized multiple methodologies including isothermal calorimetry, circular dichroism spectroscopy, single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS), enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA), and platelet aggregation test to characterize the interaction of synthetic heparin analogs with PF4 and anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies.
Results
The synthetic heparin‐like compounds display stronger binding characteristics to PF4 than animal‐derived heparins of corresponding lengths. Upon complexation with PF4, 6‐mer and S12‐mer heparins showed much lower enthalpy, induced less conformational changes in PF4, and interacted with weaker forces than 8‐, 10‐, and 12‐mer heparins. Anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies bind more weakly to complexes formed between PF4 and heparins ≤ 8‐mer than with complexes formed between PF4 and heparins ≥ 10‐mer. Addition of one sulfate group to the 12‐mer resulted in a S12‐mer, which showed substantial changes in its binding characteristics to PF4.
Conclusions
We provide a template for characterizing interactions of newly developed heparin‐based anticoagulant drugs with proteins, especially PF4 and the resulting potential antigenicity.
Background: Annual transfusion rates in many European countries range between 25 and 35 red blood cell concentrates (RBCs)/1,000 population.It is unclear why transfusion rates in Germany are considerably higher (approx. 50–55 RBCs/1,000 population). Methods: We assessed the characteristics of transfusion recipients at all hospitals of the German federal state Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania during a 10-year longitudinal study. Results: Although 75% of patients received ≤4 RBCs/patient in 2015 (1 RBC: 11.3%; 2 RBCs: 42.6%; 3 RBCs: 6.3%; 4 RBCs: 15.0%), the mean transfusion index was 4.6 RBCs due to a minority of patients with a high transfusion demand. Two thirds of all RBCs were transfused to only 25% of RBC recipients. Consistently, male patients received a higher number of RBCs (2005: 54.2%; 2015: 56.8%) and had a higher mean transfusion index than female patients (mean 5.1 ± 7.2; median 2; inter-quartile range [IQR] 2–4 vs. mean 4.0 ± 5.8; median 2; IQR 2–4). The absolute transfusion demand decreased between 2005 and 2015 by 13.5% due to a composite of active reduction (clinical practice change) and population decline in the 65- to 75-year age group (lower birth rate cohort 1940–1950); however, with major differences between hospitals (range from –61.0 to +41.4%). Conclusion: Transfusion demand in a population could largely be driven by patients with high transfusion demand. Different treatment practices in this group of patients probably add to the major differences in transfusion demand per 1,000 individuals between countries. The available data cannot prove this hypothesis. Implementation of a diagnosis-related group-based monitoring system is urgently needed to allow informative monitoring on the population level and meaningful comparisons between transfusion practices.
Abstract
Background
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is likely a misdirected bacterial host defense mechanism. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) binds to polyanions on bacterial surfaces exposing neo‐epitopes to which HIT antibodies bind. Platelets are activated by the resulting immune complexes via FcγRIIA, release bactericidal substances, and kill Gram‐negative Escherichia coli.
Objectives
To assess the role of PF4, anti‐PF4/H antibodies and FcγRIIa in killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets.
Methods
Binding of PF4 to protein‐A deficient Staphylococcus aureus (SA113Δspa) and non‐encapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae (D39Δcps) and its conformational change were assessed by flow cytometry using monoclonal (KKO,5B9) and patient derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Killing of bacteria was quantified by counting colony forming units (cfu) after incubation with platelets or platelet releasate. Using flow cytometry, platelet activation (CD62P‐expression, PAC‐1 binding) and phosphatidylserine (PS)‐exposure were analyzed.
Results
Monoclonal and patient‐derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies bound in the presence of PF4 to both S. aureus and S. pneumoniae (1.6‐fold increased fluorescence signal for human anti‐PF4/H antibodies to 24.0‐fold increase for KKO). Staphylococcus aureus (5.5 × 104cfu/mL) was efficiently killed by platelets (2.7 × 104cfu/mL) or their releasate (2.9 × 104cfu/mL). Killing was not further enhanced by PF4 or anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Blocking FcγRIIa had no impact on killing of S. aureus by platelets. In contrast, S. pneumoniae was not killed by platelets or releasate. Instead, after incubation with pneumococci platelets were unresponsive to TRAP‐6 stimulation and exposed high levels of PS.
Conclusions
Anti‐PF4/H antibodies seem to have only a minor role for direct killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets. Staphylococcus aureus is killed by platelets or platelet releasate. In contrast, S. pneumoniae affects platelet viability.