Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- development (2)
- - (1)
- Elav (1)
- Pantopoda (1)
- Prospero (1)
- Snail (1)
- SoxB (1)
- achaete–scute homolog (1)
- brain tumor (1)
- limbs (1)
Institute
Publisher
- Wiley (2)
Abstract
Individuals of the marine chelicerate lineage Pycnogonida (sea spiders) show considerable regenerative capabilities after appendage injury or loss. In their natural habitats, especially the long legs of sea spiders are commonly lost and regenerated, as is evidenced by the frequent encounter of specimens with missing or miniature legs. In contrast to this, the collection of individuals with abnormally developed appendages or trunk regions is comparably rare. Here, we studied a remarkable malformation in a postlarval instar of the species Phoxichilidium femoratum (Rathke, 1799) and describe the external morphology and internal organization of the specimen using a combination of fluorescent histochemistry and scanning electron microscopy. The individual completely lacks the last trunk segment with leg pair 4 and the normally penultimate trunk segment bears only a single aberrant appendage resembling an extension of the anteroposterior body axis. Externally, the proximal units of the articulated appendage are unpaired, but further distally a bifurcation into two equally developed leg‐like branches is found. Three‐dimensional reconstruction of the musculature reveals components of two regular leg muscle sets in several of the proximal articles. This confirms interpretation of the entire appendage as a malformed leg and reveals an externally hidden paired organization along its entire proximodistal axis. To explain the origin of this unique malformation, early pioneering studies on the regenerative potential of pycnogonids are evaluated and (a) an injury‐induced partial fusion of the developing limb buds of leg pair 3, as well as (b) irregular leg regeneration following near complete loss of trunk segments 3 and 4 are discussed. Which of the two hypotheses is more realistic remains to be tested by dedicated experimental approaches. These will have to rely on pycnogonid species with established laboratory husbandry in order to overcome the limitations of the few short‐term regeneration studies performed to date.
Abstract
Nervous system development has been intensely studied in insects (especially Drosophila melanogaster), providing detailed insights into the genetic regulatory network governing the formation and maintenance of the neural stem cells (neuroblasts) and the differentiation of their progeny. Despite notable advances over the last two decades, neurogenesis in other arthropod groups remains by comparison less well understood, hampering finer resolution of evolutionary cell type transformations and changes in the genetic regulatory network in some branches of the arthropod tree of life. Although the neurogenic cellular machinery in malacostracan crustaceans is well described morphologically, its genetic molecular characterization is pending. To address this, we established an in situ hybridization protocol for the crayfish Procambarus virginalis and studied embryonic expression patterns of a suite of key genes, encompassing three SoxB group transcription factors, two achaete–scute homologs, a Snail family member, the differentiation determinants Prospero and Brain tumor, and the neuron marker Elav. We document cell type expression patterns with notable similarities to insects and branchiopod crustaceans, lending further support to the homology of hexapod–crustacean neuroblasts and their cell lineages. Remarkably, in the crayfish head region, cell emigration from the neuroectoderm coupled with gene expression data points to a neuroblast‐independent initial phase of brain neurogenesis. Further, SoxB group expression patterns suggest an involvement of Dichaete in segmentation, in concordance with insects. Our target gene set is a promising starting point for further embryonic studies, as well as for the molecular genetic characterization of subregions and cell types in the neurogenic systems in the adult crayfish brain.