Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- PF4 (2)
- platelets (2)
- - (1)
- Araneae (1)
- Araneoidea (1)
- Bakterien (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- FcγRIIa (1)
- HIT (1)
- Pneumolysin (1)
Institute
Publisher
- Wiley (4)
Abstract
Background
Toxins are key virulence determinants of pathogens and can impair the function of host immune cells, including platelets. Insights into pathogen toxin interference with platelets will be pivotal to improve treatment of patients with bacterial bloodstream infections.
Materials and Methods
In this study, we deciphered the effects of Staphylococcus aureus toxins α‐hemolysin, LukAB, LukDE, and LukSF on human platelets and compared the effects with the pore forming toxin pneumolysin of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Activation of platelets and loss of platelet function were investigated by flow cytometry, aggregometry, platelet viability, fluorescence microscopy, and intracellular calcium release. Thrombus formation was assessed in whole blood.
Results
α‐hemolysin (Hla) is known to be a pore‐forming toxin. Hla‐induced calcium influx initially activates platelets as indicated by CD62P and αIIbβ3 integrin activation, but also induces finally alterations in the phenotype of platelets. In contrast to Hla and pneumolysin, S. aureus bicomponent pore‐forming leukocidins LukAB, LukED, and LukSF do not bind to platelets and had no significant effect on platelet activation and viability. The presence of small amounts of Hla (0.2 µg/ml) in whole blood abrogates thrombus formation indicating that in systemic infections with S. aureus the stability of formed thrombi is impaired. Damage of platelets by Hla was not neutralized by intravenous immune globulins.
Conclusion
Our findings might be of clinical relevance for S. aureus induced endocarditis. Stabilizing the aortic‐valve thrombi by inhibiting Hla‐induced impairment of platelets might reduce the risk for septic (micro‐)embolization.
Thrombozyten haben neben ihrer Funktion in der Hämostase eine wichtige Rolle in der Immunabwehr. Sie interagieren hierbei mit Komponenten des angeborenen und des adaptiven Immunsystems und sind in der Lage, direkte anti-mikrobielle Einflüsse zu vermitteln. Die Interaktion von Thrombozyten mit Gram-positiven Bakterien unterscheidet sich von jener mit Gram-negativen Erregern. Bei beiden Gruppen von Bakterien scheint die Aktivierung von Thrombozyten und Freisetzung anti-mikrobieller Peptiden aus den Granula ein wichtiger Bestandteil der direkten Pathogenabwehr durch Thrombozyten zu sein. Hierbei führt die Interaktion mit S. aureus direkt zu einer starken pathogen-induzierten Thrombozytenaktivierung, während bei Gram-negativen Organismen wie E. coli eine Verstärkung durch die Opsonierung mit PF4 und anti-PF4/H IgG notwendig scheint. Vermutlich ist die Bindung von PF4 und anti-PF4/H IgG an Gram-positive Bakterien von größerer Bedeutung für die Opsonierung für andere Immunzellen als für den direkten bakteriziden Effekt der Thrombozyten.
Der Gram-positive S. pneumoniae führt durch Funktionsstörung und Exposition von Phosphatidylserin zu einer Schädigung der Thrombozyten. Dieser schädigende Effekt auf Thrombozyten durch S. pneumoniae wird unter anderem durch Pneumolysin, ein porenbildendes Toxin der Pneumokokken, vermittelt. Dieses induziert bereits in geringen Konzentrationen die Porenbildung in der Thrombozytenmembran und führt zur Induktion von Apoptose.
In der Arbeit konnten die initialen Fragestellungen folgendermaßen beantwortet werden:
1.Thrombozyten können einen direkten schädigenden Effekt auf Gram-positive Bakterien vermitteln.
2.PF4 und anti-PF4/Polyanion IgG spielen in der direkten Thrombozyten-vermittelten Pathogenabwehr bei Gram-positiven Erregern, trotz der Bindung an Gram-positive Bakterien, eine untergeordnete Rolle. Sie verstärken weder die Thrombozyten-aktivierung noch den anti-bakteriellen Effekt.
3.Die Auswirkung der Co-Inkubation mit Bakterien auf die Thrombozyten ist heterogen und abhängig vom untersuchten Bakterienstamm. Es kommt zur Aktivierung der Thrombozyten durch S. aureus und zur Schädigung der Thrombozyten durch S. pneumoniae.
Geometric regularity of spider webs has been intensively studied in orb‐weaving spiders, although it is not exclusive of orb weavers. Here, we document the geometrically regular, repetitive elements in the webs of the non‐orb‐weaving groups Leptonetidae and Telemidae for the first time. Similar to orb weavers, we found areas with regularly spaced parallel lines in the webs of Calileptoneta helferi, Sulcia sp., and cf. Pinelema sp. Furthermore, we provide a detailed account of the regular webs of Ochyrocera (Ochyroceratidae). The sections of the web with regularly disposed parallel lines are built as U‐shaped modules reminiscent of orb webs. It has been suggested that the regularly spaced parallel lines in the webs of Ochyroceratidae and Psilodercidae may be produced in a single sweep of their posterior lateral spinnerets, which have regularly spaced aciniform gland spigots, perhaps involving expansion of the spinnerets. To test this hypothesis, we compared the spacing between parallel lines with the spacing between spigots, searched for expansible membranes in the spinnerets, and examined the junctions of regularly spaced lines. The distance between parallel lines was 10–20 times the distance between spigots, and we found no expansible membranes, and the intersection of parallel lines are cemented, which opposes the single sweep hypothesis. Furthermore, we found cues of viscid silk in the parallel lines of the psilodercid Althepus and broadened piriform gland spigots that may be responsible of its production. Finally, we evaluated the presence or absence of geometrically regular web elements across the spider tree of life. We found reports of regular webs in 31 spider families, including 20 families that are not orb weavers and hypothesize that the two basic aspects of regularity (parallel lines spaced at regular intervals, and radial lines spaced at regular angles) probably appeared many times in the evolution of spiders.
Abstract
Background
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is likely a misdirected bacterial host defense mechanism. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) binds to polyanions on bacterial surfaces exposing neo‐epitopes to which HIT antibodies bind. Platelets are activated by the resulting immune complexes via FcγRIIA, release bactericidal substances, and kill Gram‐negative Escherichia coli.
Objectives
To assess the role of PF4, anti‐PF4/H antibodies and FcγRIIa in killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets.
Methods
Binding of PF4 to protein‐A deficient Staphylococcus aureus (SA113Δspa) and non‐encapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae (D39Δcps) and its conformational change were assessed by flow cytometry using monoclonal (KKO,5B9) and patient derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Killing of bacteria was quantified by counting colony forming units (cfu) after incubation with platelets or platelet releasate. Using flow cytometry, platelet activation (CD62P‐expression, PAC‐1 binding) and phosphatidylserine (PS)‐exposure were analyzed.
Results
Monoclonal and patient‐derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies bound in the presence of PF4 to both S. aureus and S. pneumoniae (1.6‐fold increased fluorescence signal for human anti‐PF4/H antibodies to 24.0‐fold increase for KKO). Staphylococcus aureus (5.5 × 104cfu/mL) was efficiently killed by platelets (2.7 × 104cfu/mL) or their releasate (2.9 × 104cfu/mL). Killing was not further enhanced by PF4 or anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Blocking FcγRIIa had no impact on killing of S. aureus by platelets. In contrast, S. pneumoniae was not killed by platelets or releasate. Instead, after incubation with pneumococci platelets were unresponsive to TRAP‐6 stimulation and exposed high levels of PS.
Conclusions
Anti‐PF4/H antibodies seem to have only a minor role for direct killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets. Staphylococcus aureus is killed by platelets or platelet releasate. In contrast, S. pneumoniae affects platelet viability.
Background
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a prothrombotic, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)-mimicking, adverse reaction caused by platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that occurs rarely after adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccination. Strength of PF4-dependent enzyme immunoassay (EIA) reactivity—judged by optical density (OD) measurements—strongly predicts platelet-activating properties of HIT antibodies in a functional test. Whether a similar relationship holds for VITT antibodies is unknown.
Objectives
To evaluate probability for positive platelet activation testing for VITT antibodies based upon EIA OD reactivity; and to investigate simple approaches to minimize false-negative platelet activation testing for VITT.
Methods
All samples referred for VITT testing were systematically evaluated by semiquantitative in-house PF4/heparin-EIA (OD readings) and PF4-induced platelet activation (PIPA) testing within a cohort study. EIA-positive sera testing PIPA-negative were retested following 1/4 to 1/10 dilution. Logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of a positive PIPA per magnitude of EIA reactivity.
Results
Greater EIA ODs in sera from patients with suspected VITT correlated strongly with greater likelihood of PIPA reactivity. Of 61 sera (with OD values >1.0) testing negative in the PIPA, a high proportion (27/61, 44.3%) became PIPA positive when tested at 1/4 to 1/10 dilution.
Conclusions
VITT serology resembles HIT in that greater EIA OD reactivity predicts higher probability of positive testing for platelet-activating antibodies. Unlike the situation with HIT antibodies, however, diluting putative VITT serum increases probability of a positive platelet activation assay, suggesting that optimal complex formation depends on the stoichiometric ratio of PF4 and anti-PF4 VITT antibodies.