Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Angststörung (1)
- Anxiety sensitivity (1)
- Bedrohung (1)
- EMDR (1)
- Furcht (1)
- Furchtextinktion (1)
- Furchtkonditionierung (1)
- Hyperventilation (1)
- Interoception (1)
- Interozeption (1)
Institute
Fear is an emotional state, characterized by the activation of a defense system that is designed to ensure the organism’s survival. This system enables a rapid recognition of threats and organizes defensive response patterns in order to adaptively cope with the threatening environment. Yet, to ensure its flexibility under changing environmental conditions, inhibitory pathways exist that modulate the activation of this defense system, if a previously threatening cue no longer predicts any harm – a memory-formatting process referred to as fear extinction, leading to a reduction of defensive responding. Fear extinction is presumed to at least partially underlie exposure treatment of anxiety disorders, which is why the facilitation of this learning process may promote such treatment’s efficacy. Animal models suggested, that the stimulation of the vagus nerve or the superior colliculus (SC) – a midbrain structure mediating visual attentional processing – target these inhibitory extinction pathways and, thus, facilitate fear extinction. However, as it is unclear whether similar mechanisms exist in humans, this thesis manuscript examined how non-invasive stimulation of these inhibitory pathways by transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) or SC-recruiting visual attentional manipulation impact on human fear extinction.
To this end, we conducted three studies using multiple-day single-cue fear conditioning and extinction paradigms. First, we elaborated on fear that is established in these paradigms by examining defensive responding that is elicited by an innocuous conditioned stimulus, which has either been paired (fear learning group) with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US; an electric shock) or was unpaired (control group; study 1). During the following extinction training, either tVNS vs. sham stimulation was applied (study 1, study 2) or participants were instructed, to either generate saccadic eye movements (strong SC activation) vs. smooth eye pursuits (low SC activation; study 3). During subsequent sessions, extinction consolidation as well as the short- and long-term extinction recall was tested (study 2, study 3).
Conditioned fear in the fear learning group was characterized by elevated cognitive risk assessments (US-expectancy ratings), as well as increased cardiac deceleration and startle reflex potentiation compared to controls. Cardiac deceleration was positively correlated to startle potentiation, but was decoupled from cognitive risk assessments (study 1). Initial, short- and long-term extinction of these defensive responses was facilitated by tVNS on all three response levels (cognitive, physiological, behavioral; study 1, study 2). In contrast, saccades facilitated initial extinction only for physiological and behavioral elements of the defensive response pattern, while extinction consolidation and recall was impaired by any eye movement manipulation (study 3) for physiological and behavioral indicators of defensive responding.
Taken together, the data of the experimental series suggest, that on a behavioral level, conditioned fear may best be conceived as attentive immobility – a defense strategy elicited by inevitable distal threats, that is uniformly expressed across species and is accompanied by cardiac deceleration and startle reflex potentiation. In addition, it was shown that such rather automatic defensive adaptations are independent from verbally expressed threat expectancies. As expected, tVNS impacted on fear extinction on both levels, strongly in line with the suggestion, that vagal stimulation activates cortical and subcortical neural pathways involved in extinction learning, consolidation and recall. TVNS may, thus, be a promising adjuvant for exposure treatment of mental disorders. In contrast, SC-recruiting visual attentional manipulation only affected subcortically mediated defensive responding, in line with rodent findings, indicating that the SC specifically inhibits subcortical parts of the neural defense system. However, as extinction recall was impaired by any type of visual attentional manipulation, this appeared to have functioned as a form of avoidance, initially attenuating fear but preventing extinction consolidation and, thus, impairing sustained fear reduction. Both non-invasive stimulation techniques may therefore increase initial defensive flexibility in the face of no-longer threat-signaling stimuli, but only tVNS may achieve long-term effects on multiple response levels.
The fear of somatic sensations is highly relevant in the etiology and maintenance of various disorders. Nevertheless, little is known about this fear of body symptoms and many questions are yet unanswered. Especially physiological studies on interoceptive threat are rare. Therefore, the present thesis investigated defensive mobilization, autonomic arousal, and brain activation during the anticipation of, exposure to, and recovery from unpleasant body sensations. Symptoms were provoked using a standardized hyperventilation procedure in a sample of high (and as controls: low) anxiety sensitive individuals - a population high at risk for developing a panic disorder and high in fear of internal body symptoms.
In study one, anxious apprehension was investigated during anticipation of interoceptive threat (somatic sensations evoked by hyperventilation) and exteroceptive threat (electric shock). Symptom reports, autonomic arousal, and defensive mobilization assessed by the startle eyeblink response were analyzed. Extending the knowledge on anticipation of interoceptive threat, study two investigated the neural networks activated during anxious apprehension of unpleasant body sensations. Symptom reports and startle response data were collected during a learning session after which participants high and low in fear of somatic symptoms attended a fMRI session anticipating threat (hyperventilation – learned to provoke unpleasant symptoms) or safety (normal breathing). Study three examined the actual exposure to internal body symptoms, investigating symptoms reports, autonomic arousal, and the startle eyeblink response during guided breathing (hyperventilation and, as a non-provocative comparison condition, normoventilation) and during recovery. And finally, study four addressed changes in the defensive mobilization during repeated interoceptive exposure via a hyperventilation procedure. High and low anxiety sensitive persons went through two guided hyperventilation and normoventilation procedures that were spaced one week apart while symptom reports, breathing parameters, and startle response magnitudes were measured.
In study one it was demonstrated that the anticipation of exteroceptive threat led to a defensive and autonomic mobilization in high and low anxiety sensitive individuals, while during interoceptive threat only high anxiety sensitive participants were characterized by a potentiated startle response and autonomic activation. Imaging data of study two revealed that 1) during anticipation of hyperventilation all participants were characterized by an increased activation of a fear network consisting of anterior insula/ orbitofrontal cortex and rostral parts of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/ dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, 2) high fear individuals showed higher anxious apprehension than low fear controls during the entire context (safe and threat conditions), indexed by an overall stronger activation of the described network, and 3) while low fear controls learned that (undisclosed to all participants) in the fMRI scanner the threat cue was not followed by an unpleasant hyperventilation task, high fear participants continued to show stronger fear network activation to this cue. In study three it was demonstrated, that the hyperventilation procedure led to a marked increase in somatic symptoms and to autonomic arousal. While high and low anxiety sensitive groups did not differ during hyperventilation, in the early recovery only high anxiety sensitive individuals showed defensive mobilization, indicated by potentiated startle response magnitudes, and increased autonomic arousal after hyperventilation as compared to after normoventilation. Substantiating these findings, in study four all participants reported more symptoms during hyperventilation than during normoventilation, in both sessions. Nevertheless, only high anxiety sensitive participants displayed a potentiation of startle response magnitudes after the first hyper- vs. normoventilation. One week later, when the exercise was repeated this potentiation was no longer present and thus both groups no longer differed in their defensive mobilization. Even more, the number of reported baseline symptoms decreased from session one to session two in the high-AS group. While high anxiety sensitive persons reported increased baseline anxiety symptoms in session one, groups did not anymore differ in session two.
These data indicate that the standardized hyperventilation procedure is a valid paradigm to induce somatic symptoms. Moreover, it induces anxious apprehension especially in persons highly fearful of internal body symptoms. The repetition of interoceptive exposure, however, reduces associated fear in highly fearful individuals. Thus, this paradigm might provide an innovative method to study anxious apprehension and also treatment effects in patients with panic disorder. The present findings are integrated and discussed in the light of the current literature.