Doctoral Thesis
Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3) (remove)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Germany (3) (remove)
National oral health survey on refugees in Germany 2016/2017: caries and subsequent complications
(2020)
Objectives To assess oral health, caries prevalence, and subsequent complications among recently arrived refugees in Germany and to ompare these findings with the German resident population. Methods This multicenter cross-sectional study recruited 544 refugees aged 3–75+ years; they were examined at ten registration institutions in four federal states in Germany by two calibrated dentists. The refugees were screened for caries (dmft/DMFT) and its complications pufa/PUFA); this data was compared to the resident population via the presentative national oral health surveys). Results The deciduous dentition of the 3-year-old refugees had a mean dmft value of 2.62 ± 3.6 compared with 0.48 dmft in the German resident population, and caries increased to 5.22 ± 3.4 for 6–7-year-olds (Germany: 1.73 dmft). Few refugee children had naturally healthy teeth (7% in 6–7-year-olds, Germany: 56%). In the permanent dentition, the gap in caries prevalence between refugees and the German population decreased with age (35–44-year-olds: 10.55 ± 7.1 DMFT; Germany: 11.2), but refugees exhibited more caries defects (35–44-year-olds DT = 3.13 ± 3.0; Germany: 0.5). German residents had more restorations (35–44-year-olds FT = 4.21 ± 4.6). Regarding complications, the 6–7-year-olds exhibited the highest pufa index (0.86 ± 1.4) which decreased in adolescence (13–17-year-olds, 0.18 ± 0.6) and increased in adults (45–64-year-olds, 0.45 ± 0.8). Conclusion The refugees had high caries experience, often untreated caries teeth and more complications compared with the German resident population, especially in children. Closing this gap by extending preventive systems to the refugees would decrease future treatment needs. Clinical relevance European countries should be prepared for the higher dental treatment needs in recent refugees, especially in
children.
Background: Referral to specialized pediatric treatment seems to rise in Germany, especially for children under 5 years of age and mostly due to behaviour management problems, rampant caries and the need for comprehensive dental treatments. There are indications that more dental treatments under general anesthesia were needed in last decade, but there are very few studies on this topic in Germany. Aim: The objectives of this research were to investigate the characteristics and dental features of referred children to Greifswald university dental clinic in 2008 and 2011 as well as to assess dental treatment and characteristics of the children who underwent general anesthesia in 2011 at Greifswald University Clinic in comparison with three specialized pediatric private practices in Germany. Materials and methods: This retrospective analytical comparative study examined the records of all children younger than 18 years of age, whose were referred to the university dental clinic in Greifswald between 2008 and 2011. In addition, all cases that underwent general anesthesia at the university dental clinic and three other private practices in 2011 were analyzed anonymously. All data including age, gender, dental status and caries levels (dmft/DMFT), as well as diagnosis, referral/GA reasons and the dental treatments were collected and then analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences program (SPSS, Ver. 16 for Windows). Descriptive analysis was performed, along with univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi square tests. Differences between groups were tested through Mann-Whitney U test and Student’s t-test as appropriate. Results: The final study sample for children and adolescents referred to the university consisted of 389 under 18 years old (205 males and 184 females) with a mean age of 8.75 years in 2008 and 7.38 years in 2011. In addition, 297 children (160 males and 137 females) with a mean age of 4.77 years had been treated under general anesthesia in the three specialized private practices (n= 219, age: 4.81±2.06 years) and in the university (n=78, age: 4.65±2.59 years). More patients of age group 1 (5 yrs or younger), as well as, patients residing within a distance of 31-40 km away from the clinic were referred in 2011 (47.2% and 35.9% resp.) in comparison with 2008 (37.1% and 22.7% resp.) Panoramic and intraoral dental x-rays (46.7%, 11.8% resp.) have been widely carried out in 2011 compared to 2008 (29.9%, 6.5% resp. P = 0.002). Statistical analyses have shown that, younger children with higher values of dental caries indices (dmft, DMFT) were referred in 2011 (5.4 and 2.15 resp.) than in 2008 (5.16 and 1.57 resp.) with increasing demand for comprehensive dental treatment under GA. Whereas, more patients were diagnosed to have rampant caries (42.1%) in 2011 followed by orthodontic/oral surgery problems (16.9%) in comparison with 2008 (29.3%, 10.1% resp. P < 0.001). Non-invasive treatment was much more delivered (63%) in first dental visit for referred patients in 2011 followed by dental consultation (23.6%) compared to 2008 (53.6% and 21.3% resp.). While, on the other hand, considerably more fillings were supplied in 2008 (11.5%) compared to 2011 (2.6%). Further dental treatment pattern revealed more treatment under GA (27%) and a slightly more extractions (16.1%) were done in 2011 compared to 2008 (20.9%, 15.5% resp.). On the contrary, less fillings and preventive procedures were performed in 2011 (26.3% and 4.4% resp.) in comparison with 2008. Sixty-one percent of children were referred back to their family dentists in 2011 which was more than it in 2008. Indeed, about a half of children aged 5 years or younger preferred to stay at the University Clinics in 2011, while, the vast majority of children older than 12 years continued their dental care outside the University Clinics. About eighty percent and seventy percent of children underwent GA at both the university clinics and private practices respectively were under five years old. In total 7.1% mental disabilities and 2.4% preterm birth were detected in children treated under GA, as well as, dental caries were mostly diagnosed (37%) among them followed by irreversible pulpitis (21.5%) and Early Childhood Caries (ECC) (18.5%), where only 4.38% of all examined children had no carious lesions. More panoramic radiographs (41%) and less dental films (26.9%) were conducted at the university clinics as in the private practices (15.1% and 52.1% respectively) with a significant reduction in using x-rays at the university (69.2%) compared to private practices (94.1%). Dental extractions were often performed at university clinic (40.2%, 3.14±2.4) followed by fillings (33.9%, 2.65±2.7), while, more restorations and less extractions were supplied at private practices (47.8%, 5.47±3.1 and 16.3%, 1.86±2 resp.). Both of long (106-120 Min) and short (0-15 Min) treatment’s durations were needed in the university clinics to carried out the adequate dental therapy under GA, while, most of the GAs at private practices have lasted between 45 and 90 minutes. Conclusion: There is a growing definite need for specialized pediatric dentistry in Germany, especially for children under 5 years of age being referred with rampant caries and behaviour management problems to specialized pediatric dentistry. This results in a high number of extensive treatment performed under GA. In contrast to other countries, this seems to be a singular event for most children in Germany indicating a solid treatment under GA and possibly also improvements in the caries activity of the affected children afterwards. The range of dental treatment and its outcome at Greifswald University and in the examined three specialized private practices is very similar reflecting in both the profile of the children a valid indication for GA and the subsequent treatment up to date approaches in pediatric dentistry. Thus, the very professional treatment and effective secondary preventive strategies achieve better oral health and reestablished quality of life for these children, but a primary preventive approach would be preferable decreasing the number of children in need of dental treatment under general anaesthesia.
Background: Restorative treatment for children’s teeth is still an important aspect of dentistry. In the light of an only moderate caries decline in the primary dentition and a persistently low care index in Germany during the past years [DAJ 2010], there is still a demand for further work on recent patterns and outcomes of restorative treatments in primary teeth placed in everyday practices under the Germany National Health System. Objectives: The present study aimed firstly to describe the prevalence of caries and restorations in the primary teeth in Berlin and Germany from the representative Germany surveys [DAJ 2010], secondly, to describe the frequency and distribution of restorative treatment in primary teeth performed in everyday dental practice in Berlin including children age groups from 1- to 13-years of age, thirdly, to evaluate the outcomes of restorative treatment performed in everyday dental practices in these children and finally to compare results of the present study with data from the German National Health System [KZBV 2011] and randomized community data on the longevity of restorations in primary teeth in Denmark [Qvist et al. 2010a]. Material and Methodology: In the first part of present study data from representative German surveys [DAJ 2010] were interpreted to describe and compare the prevalence of caries and restorations in the primary teeth in Berlin and Germany. For the second and third parts data generated from German National Health System in Berlin (KZV-Berlin) on fillings done in everyday practices in primary teeth of 1- to 13-year-olds during 2010/2011 were collected. This data included: distribution of children with dental treatment regardless of the type of intervention provided, of children who received restorative treatments in primary teeth during dental care visits including total number of fillings per child, the number of filled tooth surfaces, retreatment with another filling, stainless steel crowns, pulp involvement and extractions after prior filling therapy. Information on the age of the original fillings at the time of retreatment was also included. The collected data then were entered into a data base for descriptive and analytical analysis. The results were compared with equivalent data from the German National Health System [KZBV 2011] and randomized community data from Denmark [Qvist et al. 2010a]. Results: Result showed a high similarity in patterns of caries and restorative treatment in primary teeth in Berlin and all of Germany as reported in the representative German surveys [DAJ 2010]. About of 84% of 1-13-year-olds insured in the German National Health System in Berlin received dental care during 2010/2011, with considerably lower rates in very young children. Fillings in primary teeth were performed in 31.17% of all children attending the dentist. Most restorations were placed in 5-8-year-olds. In 1-13-year-olds mostly just one filling was placed, more than five fillings were per child were recorded on average for very young age groups (1-4-year-olds). 55.60% of all fillings in primary teeth were two-surface restorations, whereas more than three-surface restorations comprised 6.17% of all fillings and they were performed most frequently in young children of 1-4-years of age. Retreatment to fillings in primary teeth was 7.66% of fillings placed in 1-13-year-olds. Most retreatments took place from 5 to 9 years of age with a peak in 6-year-olds. In 1-3-year-old children fillings showed shorter mean age at the time of retreatment compared to 7-year-olds and above. Retreatment of fillings in primary teeth by stainless steel crowns was very limited with only 5.16% of all retreatments and it was preferred in children from 3 to 7 years of age. The retreatment with pulp involvement was 11.27% of all retreatments. Extractions were almost as often as retreatment as another filling (ratio 4:5), but they were preferred in older children due to the course of exfoliation. Conclusions: Under the conditions of this retrospective study, the restorative treatment with fillings performed within the National Health System in primary teeth in Berlin was very successful with low rates of retreatment and the fillings shows comparable results to data on the longevity of restorations in primary teeth in Denmark. The study highlighted the need to a structured program for prevention in primary teeth, especially for very young children with high caries activity and possibly also different treatment structures with specialized dentists in this field who can perform oral rehabilitations with pulpotomies and stainless steel crowns.