Refine
Document Type
- Article (9)
Language
- English (9)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (9)
Keywords
- - (5)
- Ambulatory care (1)
- Ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation (1)
- Chronic kidney disease (1)
- Geriatric multimorbidity (1)
- Health claims data (1)
- Iodine status (1)
- Management (1)
- Matched cohortstudy (1)
- Nephrology (1)
Institute
- Institut für Community Medicine (7)
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie (3)
- Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Präventive Zahnmedizin und Kinderzahnheilkunde (2)
- Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin (1)
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie/Plastische Operationen (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (1)
- Kliniken und Polikliniken für Innere Medizin (1)
- Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung, Parodontologie und Endodontologie (1)
- Poliklinik für zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde (1)
Publisher
- BioMed Central (BMC) (2)
- MDPI (2)
- S. Karger AG (2)
- British Medical Journal Publishing Group (1)
- Hindawi (1)
- Public Library of Science (PLoS) (1)
Background
Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in the general population, little research has been conducted on CKD management in ambulatory care.
Objective was to assess management and quality of care by evaluating CKD coding in ambulatory care, patient diagnosis awareness, frequency of monitoring and whether appropriate patients are referred to nephrology.
Methods
Clinical data from the population-based cohort Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-START) were matched with claims data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Quality of care was evaluated according international and German recommendations.
Results
Data from 1778 participants (56% female, mean age 59 years) were analysed. 10% had eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (mean age 74 years), 15% had albuminuria. 21% had CKD as defined by KDIGO. 20% of these were coded and 7% self-reported having CKD. Coding increased with GFR stage (G3a 20%, G3b 61%, G4 75%, G5 100%). Serum creatinine and urinary dip stick testing were billed in the majority of all participants regardless of renal function. Testing frequency partially surpassed recommendations. Nephrology consultation was billed in few cases with stage G3b-G4.
Conclusion
CKD coding increased with stage and was performed reliably in stages ≥ G4, while CKD awareness was low. Adherence to monitoring and referral criteria varied, depending on the applicability of monitoring criteria. For assessing quality of care, consent on monitoring, patient education, referral criteria and coordination of care needs to be established, accounting for patient related factors, including age and comorbidity.
Trial registration
This study was prospectively registered as DRKS00009812 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS).