Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- - (1)
- FcγRIIa (1)
- IsdB (1)
- NLRP3 inflammasome (1)
- PF4 (1)
- Staphylococcus aureus (1)
- TLR4 (1)
- aPF4/H antibodies (1)
- cytokines (1)
- innate immunity (1)
- platelets (1)
Institute
- Institut für Immunologie u. Transfusionsmedizin - Abteilung Immunologie (2) (remove)
Publisher
The iron-regulated surface determinant protein B (IsdB) of Staphylococcus aureus is involved in the acquisition of iron from hemoglobin. Moreover, IsdB elicits an adaptive immune response in mice and humans. Here, we show that IsdB also has impact on innate immunity. IsdB induces the release of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and IL-1β, in innate immune cells of humans and mice. In silico analysis and thermophoresis show that IsdB directly binds to TLR4 with high affinity. TLR4 sensing was essential for the IsdB-mediated production of IL-6, IL-1β, and other cytokines as it was abolished by blocking of TLR4-MyD88-IRAK1/4-NF-κB signaling. The release of IL-1β additionally required activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. In human monocytes infected with live S. aureus, IsdB was necessary for maximal IL-1β release. Our studies identify S. aureus IsdB as a novel pathogen-associated molecular pattern that triggers innate immune defense mechanisms.
Abstract
Background
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is likely a misdirected bacterial host defense mechanism. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) binds to polyanions on bacterial surfaces exposing neo‐epitopes to which HIT antibodies bind. Platelets are activated by the resulting immune complexes via FcγRIIA, release bactericidal substances, and kill Gram‐negative Escherichia coli.
Objectives
To assess the role of PF4, anti‐PF4/H antibodies and FcγRIIa in killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets.
Methods
Binding of PF4 to protein‐A deficient Staphylococcus aureus (SA113Δspa) and non‐encapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae (D39Δcps) and its conformational change were assessed by flow cytometry using monoclonal (KKO,5B9) and patient derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Killing of bacteria was quantified by counting colony forming units (cfu) after incubation with platelets or platelet releasate. Using flow cytometry, platelet activation (CD62P‐expression, PAC‐1 binding) and phosphatidylserine (PS)‐exposure were analyzed.
Results
Monoclonal and patient‐derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies bound in the presence of PF4 to both S. aureus and S. pneumoniae (1.6‐fold increased fluorescence signal for human anti‐PF4/H antibodies to 24.0‐fold increase for KKO). Staphylococcus aureus (5.5 × 104cfu/mL) was efficiently killed by platelets (2.7 × 104cfu/mL) or their releasate (2.9 × 104cfu/mL). Killing was not further enhanced by PF4 or anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Blocking FcγRIIa had no impact on killing of S. aureus by platelets. In contrast, S. pneumoniae was not killed by platelets or releasate. Instead, after incubation with pneumococci platelets were unresponsive to TRAP‐6 stimulation and exposed high levels of PS.
Conclusions
Anti‐PF4/H antibodies seem to have only a minor role for direct killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets. Staphylococcus aureus is killed by platelets or platelet releasate. In contrast, S. pneumoniae affects platelet viability.