Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- alcohol (3) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
- Frontiers Media S.A. (1)
- MDPI (1)
Background
Few studies have assessed trajectories of alcohol use in the general population, and even fewer studies have assessed the impact of brief intervention on the trajectories. Especially for low-risk drinkers, it is unclear what trajectories occur, whether they benefit from intervention, and if so, when and how long. The aims were first, to identify alcohol use trajectories among at-risk and among low-risk drinkers, second, to explore potential effects of brief alcohol intervention and, third, to identify predictors of trajectories.
Methods
Adults aged 18-64 years were screened for alcohol use at a municipal registration office. Those with alcohol use in the past 12 months (N = 1646; participation rate: 67%) were randomized to assessment plus computer-generated individualized feedback letters or assessment only. Outcome was drinks/week assessed at months 3, 6, 12, and 36. Alcohol risk group (at-risk/low-risk) was determined using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption. Latent class growth models were estimated to identify alcohol use trajectories among each alcohol risk group. Sex, age, school education, employment status, self-reported health, and smoking status were tested as predictors.
Results
For at-risk drinkers, a light-stable class (46%), a medium-stable class (46%), and a high-decreasing class (8%) emerged. The light-stable class tended to benefit from intervention after 3 years (Incidence Rate Ratio, IRR=1.96; 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 1.14–3.37). Male sex, higher age, more years of school, and current smoking decreased the probability of belonging to the light-stable class (p-values<0.05). For low-risk drinkers, a very light-slightly increasing class (72%) and a light-increasing class (28%) emerged. The very light-slightly increasing class tended to benefit from intervention after 6 months (IRR=1.60; 95% CI: 1.12–2.28). Male sex and more years of school increased the probability of belonging to the light-increasing class (p-value < 0.05).
Conclusion
Most at-risk drinkers did not change, whereas the majority of low-risk drinkers increased alcohol use. There may be effects of alcohol feedback, with greater long-term benefits among persons with low drinking amounts. Our findings may help to identify refinements in the development of individualized interventions to reduce alcohol use.
This study investigated whether tobacco smoking affected outcomes of brief alcohol interventions (BAIs) in at-risk alcohol-drinking general hospital patients. Between 2011 and 2012 among patients aged 18–64 years, 961 patients were allocated to in-person counseling (PE), computer-based BAI containing computer-generated individual feedback letters (CO), and assessment only. PE and CO included contacts at baseline, 1, and 3 months. After 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, self-reported reduction of alcohol use per day was assessed as an outcome. By using latent growth curve models, self-reported smoking status, and number of cigarettes per day were tested as moderators. In PE and CO, alcohol use was reduced independently of smoking status (IRRs ≤ 0.61, ps < 0.005). At month 24, neither smoking status nor number of cigarettes per day moderated the efficacy of PE (IRR = 0.69, ps > 0.05) and CO (IRR = 0.85, ps > 0.05). Up to month 12, among persons smoking ≤ 19 cigarettes per day, the efficacy of CO increased with an increasing number of cigarettes (ps < 0.05). After 24 months, the efficacy of PE and CO that have been shown to reduce drinking did not differ by smoking status or number of cigarettes per day. Findings indicate that efficacy may differ by the number of cigarettes in the short term.
Background: Common to most theory-based intervention approaches is the idea of supporting intentions to increase the probability of behavior change. This principle works only if (a) intentions can be explained by the hypothesized socio-cognitive constructs, and (b) people actually do what they intend to do. The overall aim of this thesis was to test these premises using two health behavior theories applied to reducing at-risk alcohol use. Method: The three papers underlying this thesis were based on data of the randomized controlled “Trial Of Proactive Alcohol interventions among job-Seekers” (TOPAS). A total of 1243 job-seekers with at-risk alcohol use were randomized to stage tailored intervention (ST), non-stage tailored intervention (NST), or control group. The ST participants (n = 426) were analyzed in paper 1. Paper 2 was based on the baseline and 3-month data provided by the NST participants (n = 433). Paper 3 was based on baseline, 3-, 6-, and 15-month data provided by the control and ST group not intending to change alcohol use (n = 629). Latent variable modeling was used to investigate the associations of social-cognitive constructs and intentional stages (paper 1), the extent to which intentions were translated into alcohol use (paper 2), and the different trajectories of alcohol use among people not intending to change as well as the ST effect on the trajectories (paper 3). Results: Persons in different intentional stages differed in the processes of change in which they engaged, in the importance placed by them on the pros and cons of alcohol use, and in the perceived ability to quit (ps < 0.01). The association between intentions and alcohol use was weak. The magnitude of this intention-behavior gap depended on the extent to which normative expectations have changed over time (p < 0.01) and was reduced when controlling for the mediating effect of temporal stability of intentions. The gap was also present among people not intending to change: Even without intervention, 35% of the persons reduced the amount of alcohol use after 15 months (p < 0.05) and 2% achieved abstinence. Persons with heavier drinking (33%) and persons with low but frequent use (30%) did not change. Persons with frequent alcohol use seem to benefit less from ST than those with occasional use, although differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Intentions can be quite well explained by the hypothesized socio-cognitive constructs. In a sample of persons who were, as a whole, little motivated to change, the precision of how well intentions predict subsequent alcohol use was modest though. Time and socio-contextual influences should be considered.