Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Feldmaus (2) (remove)
Institute
Hepeviruses are small viruses with a RNA-genome of positive polarity that form the family Hepeviridae. The family includes two genera: members of the genus Piscihepevirus were detected in fish species and members of the genus Orthohepevirus were found in different mammal and bird species. The genus Orthohepevirus contains four different species, namely Orthohepevirus A, B, C and D. The species Orthohepevirus A contains five human pathogenic genotypes, with three of them being zoonotic. The species Orthohepevirus C contains mammal-associated pathogens, which were identified in rats and carnivores. The human pathogenic genotypes are responsible for a self-limiting acute hepatitis in humans, which could become chronically in immunocompromised individuals. The main route of transmission is the consumption of undercooked meat and direct contact with HEV-positive excreta or blood. In Germany, hepatitis E is a notifiable disease since 2001 with an increased number of cases per year. Rats are the reservoir of rat-associated HEV (ratHEV), but also the zoonotic HEV-3 genotype was detected in rats. The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) was identified as a reservoir host of a subgenotype of human pathogenic HEV-3 (HEV-3ra).
For the development of small mammal animal models, the objective of this study was to evaluate different small mammal populations for novel hepeviruses and to study the presence of HEV and sequence divergence of ratHEV and rabbitHEV in rat and rabbit populations from Europe.
Approximately 3000 rodents from Germany and the Czech Republic were screened by broad spectrum HEV-RT-PCR. As a result, 13 common voles (Microtus arvalis) and one bank vole (Myodes glareolus) were detected to be HEV-RNA positive. Comparison of the obtained sequences, complete genome determination and phylogenetic analysis indicated the finding of a novel common vole-associated HEV (cvHEV), which shows a high sequence divergence towards other members of the species Orthohepevirus C, but shares a high sequence similarity to a HEV-genome derived from a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). The finding of cvHEV-RNA in a bank vole might be caused by a spillover infection. The cvHEV genome shares the hepevirus-typical open reading frames, but also has unique cvHEV-specific attributes in its genome.
The investigation of 420 Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and 88 Black rats (Rattus rattus) identified HEV-RNA in Norway rats from eight of nine and Black rats from two of four European countries. In a single Norway rat from Belgium, a HEV-3-strain with high sequence similarities to rabbitHEV (HEV-3ra), was detected. The investigation of zoo animals revealed a ratHEV spillover infection in a Syrian brown bear (Ursus arctos syriacus). This infection was most likely caused by ratHEV-infected free-living, wild rats from the same zoo.
Investigation of wild rabbit populations trapped in and around Frankfurt am Main, Germany, showed anti-HEV antibodies (34.7%) and rabbitHEV-RNA (25%). A high sequence similarity of rabbitHEV in the animals trapped at the urban site was observed, whereas a high sequence divergence was seen for the animals trapped at the rural trapping sites.
In conclusion, hepeviruses are widespread among different small mammal populations in Europe. The broad geographical distribution of these hepeviruses should be taken into account in further public health risk assessments. Further investigations are needed to characterize the presence of cvHEV in more detail, especially by taking the population dynamics of common voles into account. The detected HEV-strains could be taken as basis for the establishment of novel HEV-animal models, which might replace the so far used swine and non-human primate models.
The aim of this work was to characterize the distribution of TULV in European common vole populations, to clarify the host association of TULV and to investigate correlations between host population dynamics and changes in TULV prevalence. Furthermore, the potential of common voles as reservoir for other rodent-borne pathogens was examined in comparison to other rodent species.
Molecular and serological analysis of rodents captured at 87 locations in Germany, France, Luxembourg, and Austria revealed TULV infections at 53.6 % of all trapping locations. The seroprevalence in common voles was low with a mean of 8.5 % (range: 0 – 19 %). TULV RNA was more often detected (mean: 15.3 %, range 0 - 37.5 %). Field voles (Microtus agrestis) and water voles (Arvicola amphibius) were less often tested positive for TULV: mean seroprevalence was 7 % for field voles and 6.7 % for water voles. RNA could be detected in 5.4 % of all tested field voles and 3.2 % of water voles and with exception of a single field vole only when TULV-RNA-positive common voles were trapped at the same location. Those results indicate that TULV infections of field and water voles are spillover infections from sympatric TULV-infected common voles. Phylogenetic analysis revealed distinct genetic differences between TULV sequences of regions of greater geographical distance which were associated with different evolutionary common vole lineages. Furthermore, we could detect genetic differences between TULV strains from trapping sites close to each other (ca. 10 km).
In a capture-mark-recapture study 1042 common voles captured in live traps in Germany were sampled as well as 225 captured in snap traps. When analyzing the seroprevalence of fluctuating common vole populations over several years and seasons we found a negative correlation between prevalence and population density in the current season but a delayed density-dependent positive correlation between the current population density and seroprevalence in the next season. However, this trend varied geographically between the four trapping locations. Usually, population density as well as seroprevalence peaked at the end of the reproductive period in autumn with the exception of Weissach (2010-2012), Jeeser (2010) and Gotha (2012) where population peaks in summer were observed.
In a pilot study in Austria common voles were captured as well as three other rodent species. They were investigated not only for presence of different viruses (TULV, Dobrava- Belgrade orthohantavirus (DOBV), Puumala orthohantavirus (PUUV), Lymphocytic choriomeningitis mammarenavirus (LCMV), Cowpox virus (CPXV)) but also pathogenic bacteria and endoparasites (Leptospira spp., Toxoplasma gondii, Borrelia afzelii, Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia spp. und Bartonella spp.). Of all four captured species, common voles were most often infected with at least one pathogen (66.7 %), followed by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) (57.7 %), bank voles (Myodes glareolus) (35 %) and yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis) (34.5 %). Common voles were also exceptionally susceptible to multiple infections: 66.7 % of them were infected with two or three different pathogens, compared to 6.9 % of yellow-necked field mice and 2.5 % of bank voles. No multiple infections could be detected in wood mice.
The broad geographic distribution of TULV in its reservoir host is in contrast to the rare reports of human infection but might be explained with a low pathogenicity for humans or with the low prevalence in host populations. In addition, the rare detection of human TULV infections could be a result of the used diagnostic methods. Since the reservoir population is known for its dramatic changes in population density and recurring superabundances which facilitates frequent contact to humans, TULV should more often be considered as cause for human disease in future analysis. In
addition, several other zoonotic pathogens could be detected in common voles which could influence TULV infections in the reservoir host but also TULV transmission to humans and therefore deserve more attention in future research.