Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (1)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Keywords
- Grünland (1)
- Lebensraum (1)
- Schutzmaßnahme (1)
- Wachtelkönig (1)
Institute
In agricultural grasslands, management practice highly determines reproductive success for ground-nesting bird species. The most effective conservation measure is the delay of first mowing dates until broods fledge or bird friendly mowing. Late mowing often implies economical losses for farmers and may increase land use abandonment, which will, in turn, cause habitat deterioration. Thus, grassland bird conservation involves the challenge to protect broods against land use and to promote an appropriate management to sustain habitat quality at the same time. Because of their late and extended breeding season Corncrakes Crex crex are in particular vulnerable to frequent mowing which increases nest destruction, chick mortality and habitat loss.
This thesis aims to gain knowledge on favourable habitat characteristics and brood protection in relation with grassland management to derive implications for the conservation of Corncrake breeding sites in floodplain meadows. Study area is the Lower Oder Valley National Park in northeastern Germany that holds a Corncrake population of 50 to 250 calling males. The study covered two study periods, before (1998-2000) and after (2012-2015) the implementation of new Corncrake conservation measures allowing inferences on the effects of different timing and intensity of mowing for brood protection and habitat conservation.
Breeding was only confirmed on meadows with high forb cover, low sedge cover, low litter heights and a close location to ditches. Radio-tracked females preferred areas with high cover of forbs (> 30%) and a distinct relief heterogeneity, which was associated with increased vegetation diversity. Vegetation characteristics on sites with day calling activity of males showed more similarity with breeding sites than with sites only used for nocturnal calling, supporting the assumption that diurnal calling indicates the occurrence of females. Favoured vegetation structure was best provided by mowing in the preceding year. Low-intensity grazing was less effective in reducing litter and sedge cover, especially when conducted late in the season. In the absence of management, meadows rapidly overgrow and dense litter accumulates from dead plant material in eutrophic floodplains, which increases walking resistance for Corncrakes and may impede prey accessibility. Plant species richness and forb cover declined after land use cessation. Male Corncrakes abandoned calling sites on meadows unmanaged for longer periods.
Besides the availability of suitable nesting sites, food supply and nest predation risk are also related to vegetation structure and may indirectly influence the habitat quality. Faecal samples of Corncrakes consisted mainly of beetles and their larvae, followed by snails, spiders and earthworms. Invertebrate biomass, sampled with pitfall-traps, was twice as high, the numbers of large ground beetles even five times higher on previously unmanaged than on managed meadows. Invertebrate abundance was highest in the first and second years after land use abandonment, but strongly decreased afterwards to a similar level like under annual management. Therefore, unmown refuge strips for Corncrake protection and alternating mowing also enhance invertebrate prey resources in floodplain meadows.
Mammals caused the majority of all observed artificial ground nest predations. Nest predation risk was higher on previously unmanaged than on managed sites. Unmanaged meadows probably attract mammalian predators, because they provide a more favourable vegetation structure for foraging and harbour high numbers of small rodents, increasing also the risk of incidental nest predations. These findings suggest that an annual removal of vegetation, if conducted late in the season to protect grassland birds may reduce predation risk of ground nests in the subsequent year.
Whereas during 1998-2000 half of the study area was managed by the end of July, land use was delayed on meadows occupied by Corncrakes until at least 15 July or 15 August during 2012-2015. On meadows mown between 15 July and 15 August refuge strips were applied. The majority of Corncrake broods were started in the second half of May and mowing postponement until 15 August allows 80% of chicks to fledge without disturbance in the study area. In 65% of broods chicks reach independence (> 14 days old) until 15 July and can be protected by Corncrake friendly mowing because then they are large enough to successfully escape during mowing. Both adults and chicks survived in 10 m wide refuge strips. Because most birds tried to leave the unmown block for the first time when it was up to 30 m wide and only 15 to 30 m wide strips served as temporary habitat for unfledged chicks from mowing to departure, 10 m should be considered as the absolute minimum width for refuge strips.
The strong reduction of land use especially during July should have allowed more chicks to survive until fledging in 2012-2015 than 1998-2000. Besides the protection of nests and higher chick survival, the decline of mowing intensity increased the extent of habitat available for second breeding attempts. In 2012-2015, broods were initiated until late July in the study area. Male Corncrakes showed continuous arrival and departure during the breeding season. Similar departure rates were estimated by a multi-state occupancy model and for radio-tracked males in the same study area and periods, which both left their home ranges spontaneous and due to the impact of mowing. Compared to 1998-2000, total departure of males during June and July was reduced by 50% in 2012-2015, when more calling sites were protected from mowing. Although male Corncrakes show high intra-seasonal dispersal due to their sequential polygamous breeding system, postponed land use should have increased mating opportunities and re-nesting at first breeding sites.
Therefore, future directions of Corncrake conservation in eutrophic floodplains should address the increase of annual late mowing to protect broods and maintain favourable habitat conditions by creating a more flexible mowing regime adjusted to actual occurrence of Corncrakes. This requires expert advice to farmers based on an intense monitoring of calling Corncrakes. Repeated nocturnal surveys during May and June are highly recommended because low detection probability in combination with constant departure substantially underestimated the number of males present. Additionally, diurnal calling activity could improve the identification of breeding sites and timing could be used to estimate chick age in July to select sites for Corncrake friendly mowing. Because currently late mowing dates are unattractive for farmers conservation actions should along with financial compensations for mowing after 15 August promote the utilization of late-cut grass with poor nutrient quality for combustion. Energy production could provide an alternative income for farmers operating in conservation areas with delayed land use dates and will increase their acceptance of Corncrake protection measures.