Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- - (2)
- Sepsis (2)
- CLP (1)
- Early mobilization (1)
- ICUAW (1)
- ICU‐acquired weakness (1)
- Muscle atrophy (1)
- NF‐κB (1)
- Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (1)
- Protocol‐based physiotherapy (1)
Institute
Publisher
- Wiley (2)
Abstract
Background
Early mobilization improves physical independency of critically ill patients at hospital discharge in a general intensive care unit (ICU)‐cohort. We aimed to investigate clinical and molecular benefits or detriments of early mobilization and muscle activating measures in a high‐risk ICU‐acquired weakness cohort.
Methods
Fifty patients with a SOFA score ≥9 within 72 h after ICU admission were randomized to muscle activating measures such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation or whole‐body vibration in addition to early protocol‐based physiotherapy (intervention) or early protocol‐based physiotherapy alone (control). Muscle strength and function were assessed by Medical Research Council (MRC) score, handgrip strength and Functional Independence Measure at first awakening, ICU discharge, and 12 month follow‐up. Patients underwent open surgical muscle biopsy on day 15. We investigated the impact of muscle activating measures in addition to early protocol‐based physiotherapy on muscle strength and function as well as on muscle wasting, morphology, and homeostasis in patients with sepsis and ICU‐acquired weakness. We compared the data with patients treated with common physiotherapeutic practice (CPP) earlier.
Results
ICU‐acquired weakness occurs within the entire cohort, and muscle activating measures did not improve muscle strength or function at first awakening (MRC median [IQR]: CPP 3.3 [3.0–4.3]; control 3.0 [2.7–3.4]; intervention 3.0 [2.1–3.8]; P > 0.05 for all), ICU discharge (MRC median [IQR]: CPP 3.8 [3.4–4.4]; control 3.9 [3.3–4.0]; intervention 3.6 [2.8–4.0]; P > 0.05 for all), and 12 month follow‐up (MRC median [IQR]: control 5.0 [4.3–5.0]; intervention 4.8 [4.3–5.0]; P = 0.342 for all). No signs of necrosis or inflammatory infiltration were present in the histological analysis. Myocyte cross‐sectional area in the intervention group was significantly larger in comparison with the control group (type I +10%; type IIa +13%; type IIb +3%; P < 0.001 for all) and CPP (type I +36%; type IIa +49%; type IIb +65%; P < 0.001 for all). This increase was accompanied by an up‐regulated gene expression for myosin heavy chains (fold change median [IQR]: MYH1 2.3 [1.1–2.7]; MYH2 0.7 [0.2–1.8]; MYH4 5.1 [2.2–15.3]) and an unaffected gene expression for TRIM63, TRIM62, and FBXO32.
Conclusions
In our patients with sepsis syndrome at high risk for ICU‐acquired weakness muscle activating measures in addition to early protocol‐based physiotherapy did not improve muscle strength or function at first awakening, ICU discharge, or 12 month follow‐up. Yet it prevented muscle atrophy.
Abstract
Background
Critically ill patients frequently develop muscle atrophy and weakness in the intensive‐care‐unit setting [intensive care unit‐acquired weakness (ICUAW)]. Sepsis, systemic inflammation, and acute‐phase response are major risk factors. We reported earlier that the acute‐phase protein serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) is increased and accumulates in muscle of ICUAW patients, but its relevance was unknown. Our objectives were to identify SAA1 receptors and their downstream signalling pathways in myocytes and skeletal muscle and to investigate the role of SAA1 in inflammation‐induced muscle atrophy.
Methods
We performed cell‐based in vitro and animal in vivo experiments. The atrophic effect of SAA1 on differentiated C2C12 myotubes was investigated by analysing gene expression, protein content, and the atrophy phenotype. We used the cecal ligation and puncture model to induce polymicrobial sepsis in wild type mice, which were treated with the IкB kinase inhibitor Bristol‐Myers Squibb (BMS)‐345541 or vehicle. Morphological and molecular analyses were used to investigate the phenotype of inflammation‐induced muscle atrophy and the effects of BMS‐345541 treatment.
Results
The SAA1 receptors Tlr2, Tlr4, Cd36, P2rx7, Vimp, and Scarb1 were all expressed in myocytes and skeletal muscle. Treatment of differentiated C2C12 myotubes with recombinant SAA1 caused myotube atrophy and increased interleukin 6 (Il6) gene expression. These effects were mediated by Toll‐like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4. SAA1 increased the phosphorylation and activity of the transcription factor nuclear factor ‘kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer' of activated B‐cells (NF‐κB) p65 via TLR2 and TLR4 leading to an increased binding of NF‐κB to NF‐κB response elements in the promoter region of its target genes resulting in an increased expression of NF‐κB target genes. In polymicrobial sepsis, skeletal muscle mass, tissue morphology, gene expression, and protein content were associated with the atrophy response. Inhibition of NF‐κB signalling by BMS‐345541 increased survival (28.6% vs. 91.7%, P < 0.01). BMS‐345541 diminished inflammation‐induced atrophy as shown by a reduced weight loss of the gastrocnemius/plantaris (vehicle: −21.2% and BMS‐345541: −10.4%; P < 0.05), tibialis anterior (vehicle: −22.7% and BMS‐345541: −17.1%; P < 0.05) and soleus (vehicle: −21.1% and BMS‐345541: −11.3%; P < 0.05) in septic mice. Analysis of the fiber type specific myocyte cross‐sectional area showed that BMS‐345541 reduced inflammation‐induced atrophy of slow/type I and fast/type II myofibers compared with vehicle‐treated septic mice. BMS‐345541 reversed the inflammation‐induced atrophy program as indicated by a reduced expression of the atrogenes Trim63/MuRF1, Fbxo32/Atrogin1, and Fbxo30/MuSA1.
Conclusions
SAA1 activates the TLR2/TLR4//NF‐κB p65 signalling pathway to cause myocyte atrophy. Systemic inhibition of the NF‐κB pathway reduced muscle atrophy and increased survival of septic mice. The SAA1/TLR2/TLR4//NF‐κB p65 atrophy pathway could have utility in combatting ICUAW.