Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Caries prevention (3) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
- Karger AG (1)
- Springer Nature (1)
Purpose
The significance of the underlying literature in clinical guidelines can be weakened by the risk of bias, which could negatively affect the recommendations. Especially in controversial matters, such as fluoride use for caries prevention in children, biased results may be not reliable and lead to incorrect conclusions. This study was performed to detect bias in underlying literature of the German guideline for caries prevention using fluoride in children, where no consensus was reached between paediatricians and paediatric dentists.
Methods
Three tools used for risk of bias assessments of different study designs were RoB 2 for RCTs, ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies, and ROBIS for systematic reviews. For each study cited in the guideline two independent risk of bias assessments were performed. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Results
Out of 58 papers, 48.3% (n = 28) showed high risk of bias, with the majority in sections regarding fluoride tablets, fluoridated toothpaste, and paediatricians’ recommendations. 9 out of 20 recommendations and statements were based on studies with high risk of bias, all of which were in these three controversial sections. 13 out of 29 RCTs showed high risk of bias (44.8%), as all 13 non-randomized trials did, while only 2 of 16 (12.5%) systematic reviews had high risk of bias.
Conclusion
Considering risk of bias of cited studies in clinical guidelines may result in substantial changes in its recommendations and aid in reaching consensus. Efforts should be made to assess risk of bias of underlying literature in future clinical guidelines.
Aim: To provide recommendations for dental clinicians for the management of dental caries in older adults with special emphasis on root caries lesions. Methods: A consensus workshop followed by a Delphi consensus process were conducted with an expert panel nominated by ORCA, EFCD, and DGZ boards. Based on a systematic review of the literature, as well as non-systematic literature search, recommendations for clinicians were developed and consented in a two-stage Delphi process. Results: Demographic and epidemiologic changes will significantly increase the need of management of older adults and root caries in the future. Ageing is associated with a decline of intrinsic capacities and an increased risk of general diseases. As oral and systemic health are linked, bidirectional consequences of diseases and interventions need to be considered. Caries prevention and treatment in older adults must respond to the patient’s individual abilities for self-care and cooperation and often involves the support of caregivers. Systemic interventions may involve dietary counselling, oral hygiene instruction, the use of fluoridated toothpastes, and the stimulation of salivary flow. Local interventions to manage root lesions may comprise local biofilm control, application of highly fluoridated toothpastes or varnishes as well as antimicrobial agents. Restorative treatment is often compromised by the accessibility of such root caries lesions as well as the ability of the senior patient to cooperate. If optimum restorative treatment is impossible or inappropriate, long-term stabilization, e.g., by using glass-ionomer cements, and palliative treatments that aim to maintain oral function as long and as well as possible may be the treatment of choice for the individual.
Background: Early childhood caries remains an unsolved problem in children under three worldwide. Midwives are important health care persons around birth and can shape behavior. They possibly can play a positive role in preventing early childhood caries in young children. Objective: to assess how involved midwives are in early childhood caries prevention, what preventive measures they recommend and what knowledge they have about early childhood caries, as well as to study the potential differences between the various federal states or due to their work experience. Materials and Methods: An online survey targeted midwives in Germany regarding their knowledge about early childhood caries as well as the preventive measures they recommended. Participants were members of the German Association of Midwives (DHV). The survey invitation was published with the monthly newsletter and in the association journal of the DHV. Data was collected anonymously. Results: 191 midwives nationwide responded to the questionnaire. Most midwives were aware about ECC prevalence, consequences, causes and the teeth mainly affected. Midwives gave excellent recommendations regarding diet, oral hygiene and avoiding prolonged bottle feeding. However, only 40.8% of midwives recommended the first dental visit with the eruption of the first tooth. 71.7% recommended a fluoride tooth paste with the eruption of the first tooth. The rest advised a later use or non-fluoridated toothpaste. Regional differences were minimal. Conclusion: Midwives have good oral health knowledge, but there is some variability in recommendations on the first dental visit and the use of fluoride toothpaste which reflects an inconsistency of professional recommendations delivered by different health care institutions in Germany.