Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- epidemiology (4) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Community Medicine (4) (remove)
Publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group (1)
- Frontiers Media S.A. (1)
- MDPI (1)
Objective
Whole-body MRI (wb-MRI) is increasingly used in research and screening but little is known about the effects of incidental findings (IFs) on health service utilisation and costs. Such effects are particularly critical in an observational study. Our principal research question was therefore how participation in a wb-MRI examination with its resemblance to a population-based health screening is associated with outpatient service costs.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
General population Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Participants
Analyses included 5019 participants of the Study of Health in Pomerania with statutory health insurance data. 2969 took part in a wb-MRI examination in addition to a clinical examination programme that was administered to all participants. MRI non-participants served as a quasi-experimental control group with propensity score weighting to account for baseline differences.Primary and secondary outcome measuresOutpatient costs (total healthcare usage, primary care, specialist care, laboratory tests, imaging) during 24 months after the examination were retrieved from claims data. Two-part models were used to compute treatment effects.
Results
In total, 1366 potentially relevant IFs were disclosed to 948 MRI participants (32% of all participants); most concerned masses and lesions (769 participants, 81%). Costs for outpatient care during the 2-year observation period amounted to an average of €2547 (95% CI 2424 to 2671) for MRI non-participants and to €2839 (95% CI 2741 to 2936) for MRI participants, indicating an increase of €295 (95% CI 134 to 456) per participant which corresponds to 11.6% (95% CI 5.2% to 17.9%). The cost increase was sustained rather than being a short-term spike. Imaging and specialist care related costs were the main contributors to the increase in costs.
Conclusions
Communicated findings from population-based wb-MRI substantially impacted health service utilisation and costs. This introduced bias into the natural course of healthcare utilisation and should be taken care for in any longitudinal analyses.
Do We Need to Rethink the Epidemiology and Healthcare Utilization of Parkinson's Disease in Germany?
(2018)
Epidemiological aspects of Parkinson's disease (PD), co-occurring diseases and medical healthcare utilization of PD patients are still largely elusive. Based on claims data of 3.7 million statutory insurance members in Germany in 2015 the prevalence and incidence of PD was determined. PD cases had at least one main hospital discharge diagnosis of PD, or one physician diagnosis confirmed by a subsequent or independent diagnosis or by PD medication in 2015. Prevalence of (co-)occurring diseases, mortality, and healthcare measures in PD cases and matched controls were compared. In 2015, 21,714 prevalent PD cases (standardized prevalence: 511.4/100,000 persons) and 3,541 incident PD cases (standardized incidence: 84.1/100,000 persons) were identified. Prevalence of several (co-)occurring diseases/complications, e.g., dementia (PD/controls: 39/13%), depression (45/22%), bladder dysfunction (46/22%), and diabetes (35/31%), as well as mortality (10.7/5.8%) differed between PD cases and controls. The annual healthcare utilization was increased in PD cases compared to controls, e.g., regarding mean ± SD physician contacts (15.2 ± 7.6/12.2 ± 7.3), hospitalizations (1.3 ± 1.8/0.7 ± 1.4), drug prescriptions (overall: 37.7 ± 24.2/21.7 ± 19.6; anti-PD medication: 7.4 ± 7.4/0.1 ± 0.7), assistive/therapeutic devices (47/30%), and therapeutic remedies (57/16%). The standardized prevalence and incidence of PD in Germany as well as mortality in PD may be substantially higher than reported previously. While frequently diagnosed with co-occurring diseases/complications, such as dementia, depression, bladder dysfunction and diabetes, the degree of healthcare utilization shows large variability between PD patients. These findings encourage a rethinking of the epidemiology and healthcare utilization in PD, at least in Germany. Longitudinal studies of insurance claims data should further investigate the individual and epidemiological progression and healthcare demands in PD.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the most challenging health problems for the next decades. The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health care systems is largely driven by the increasing prevalence, the management of the disease and subsequent comorbidities, even in people with prediabetes or undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. An early detection of high risk groups is necessary to identify and modify risk factors such as obesity, physical inactivity or cigarette smoking which showed regional disparities in their distribution within a country. This leads to the assumption that there might be regional disparities regarding the prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus as well. For Germany as for other countries, comparable data on possible regional disparities in the prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus are missing. The aim of the present dissertation is to estimate the prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus on regional level within Germany, and to estimate the smoking prevalence as a modifiable risk factor in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the Diabetes Collaborative Research of Epidemiologic Studies consortium (DIAB CORE) within the Competence Net Diabetes in Germany. Well comparable data of five regional studies and one nationwide reference study are included: the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP); the Cardiovascular Disease, Living and Ageing in Halle Study (CARLA); the Dortmund Health Study (DHS); the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (HNR); the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg Study (KORA); and the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998 (GNHIES 98). First, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was estimated. Data from five regional population-based studies and one nationwide study conducted between 1997 and 2006 with participants aged 45 to 74 years were analyzed. Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence estimates based on self-reports (standardized to the German population for the regional studies, reference date 2007/12/31) were compared. Of 11,688 participants of the regional studies, 1,008 had a known type 2 diabetes mellitus, corresponding to a prevalence of 8.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1% 9.1%). The standardized prevalence was highest in the East with 12.0% (95% CI 10.3% 13.7%) and lowest in the South of Germany with 5.8% (95% CI 4.9% 6.7%).Second, the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was estimated. Data from participants (baseline age 45 to 74 years) from five regional population-based studies were included. The incidence rates per 1,000 person-years (95% CI) and the cumulative incidence (95% CI) from regional studies were directly standardized to the German population (reference date 2007/12/31) and weighted by inverse probability weights for losses to follow-up. Of 8,787 participants, 521 (5.9%) developed type 2 diabetes mellitus corresponding to an incidence rate of 11.8 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 10.8 12.9). The incidence of known type 2 diabetes mellitus showed regional disparities within Germany. The incidence was highest in the East and lowest in the South of Germany with 16.9 (95% CI 13.3 21.8) vs. 9.0 (95% CI 7.4 11.1) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Third, the smoking prevalence in participants aged 20 to 79 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the regional SHIP and the nationwide GNHIES 98 was estimated. Prevalence estimates of cigarette smoking were calculated using weights reflecting the European adult population (reference date 2005/12/31). The overall prevalence of current smoking was lower among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus than among participants without type 2 diabetes mellitus (17.3% vs. 38.0% in SHIP and 24.7% vs. 32.1% in GNHIES 98). In both studies, the prevalence of current smoking was highest in men aged 20 to 39 years, in particular among men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. To conclude, considerable disparities in prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus indicate the need for interventions on the regional level within Germany. Former smoking was more prevalent among both men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus in comparison to current and non-smoking. This finding probably reflects behavioural changes secondary to the disease onset and medical counselling. The finding that men aged 20 to 39 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus were more often current smokers than men without type 2 diabetes mellitus underpins the importance of smoking as one of the main modifiable risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus.