Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- PF4 (2) (remove)
Institute
For the last two decades, heparins have been widely used as anticoagulants. Besides
numerous advantages, up to 5% patients with heparin administration suffer from a major adverse
drug effect known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This typical HIT can result in deep
vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, occlusion of a limb artery, acute myocardial infarct, stroke, and
a systemic reaction or skin necrosis. The basis of HIT may lead to clinical insights. Recent studies using
single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS)-based atomic force microscopy revealed detailed binding
mechanisms of the interactions between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparins of different lengths in
typical HIT. Especially, SMFS results allowed identifying a new mechanism of the autoimmune HIT
caused by a subset of human-derived antibodies in patients without heparin exposure. The findings
proved that not only heparin but also a subset of antibodies induce thrombocytopenia. In this review,
the role of SMFS in unraveling a major adverse drug effect and insights into molecular mechanisms
inducing thrombocytopenia by both heparins and antibodies will be discussed.
Abstract
Background
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is likely a misdirected bacterial host defense mechanism. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) binds to polyanions on bacterial surfaces exposing neo‐epitopes to which HIT antibodies bind. Platelets are activated by the resulting immune complexes via FcγRIIA, release bactericidal substances, and kill Gram‐negative Escherichia coli.
Objectives
To assess the role of PF4, anti‐PF4/H antibodies and FcγRIIa in killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets.
Methods
Binding of PF4 to protein‐A deficient Staphylococcus aureus (SA113Δspa) and non‐encapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae (D39Δcps) and its conformational change were assessed by flow cytometry using monoclonal (KKO,5B9) and patient derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Killing of bacteria was quantified by counting colony forming units (cfu) after incubation with platelets or platelet releasate. Using flow cytometry, platelet activation (CD62P‐expression, PAC‐1 binding) and phosphatidylserine (PS)‐exposure were analyzed.
Results
Monoclonal and patient‐derived anti‐PF4/H antibodies bound in the presence of PF4 to both S. aureus and S. pneumoniae (1.6‐fold increased fluorescence signal for human anti‐PF4/H antibodies to 24.0‐fold increase for KKO). Staphylococcus aureus (5.5 × 104cfu/mL) was efficiently killed by platelets (2.7 × 104cfu/mL) or their releasate (2.9 × 104cfu/mL). Killing was not further enhanced by PF4 or anti‐PF4/H antibodies. Blocking FcγRIIa had no impact on killing of S. aureus by platelets. In contrast, S. pneumoniae was not killed by platelets or releasate. Instead, after incubation with pneumococci platelets were unresponsive to TRAP‐6 stimulation and exposed high levels of PS.
Conclusions
Anti‐PF4/H antibodies seem to have only a minor role for direct killing of Gram‐positive bacteria by platelets. Staphylococcus aureus is killed by platelets or platelet releasate. In contrast, S. pneumoniae affects platelet viability.