Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- - (1)
- ESKAPE strain (1)
- Escherichia coli (1)
- RNA-Seq (1)
- arginine biosynthesis (1)
- biofilm inhibitor (1)
- checkerboard (1)
- combination with antibiotic (1)
- metabolic processes (1)
- motility (1)
- natural products (1)
- phenolic compounds (1)
- transcriptome (1)
Institute
Publisher
- Frontiers Media S.A. (1)
- Wiley (1)
Multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens such as Escherichia coli have become increasingly difficult to treat and therefore alternative treatment options are needed. Targeting virulence factors like biofilm formation could be one such option. Inhibition of biofilm-related structures like curli and cellulose formation in E. coli has been shown for different phenolic natural compounds like epigallocatechin gallate. This study demonstrates this effect for other structurally unrelated phenolics, namely octyl gallate, scutellarein and wedelolactone. To verify whether these structurally different compounds influence identical pathways of biofilm formation in E. coli a broad comparative RNA-sequencing approach was chosen with additional RT-qPCR to gain initial insights into the pathways affected at the transcriptomic level. Bioinformatical analysis of the RNA-Seq data was performed using DESeq2, BioCyc and KEGG Mapper. The comparative bioinformatics analysis on the pathways revealed that, irrespective of their structure, all compounds mainly influenced similar biological processes. These pathways included bacterial motility, chemotaxis, biofilm formation as well as metabolic processes like arginine biosynthesis and tricarboxylic acid cycle. Overall, this work provides the first insights into the potential mechanisms of action of novel phenolic biofilm inhibitors and highlights the complex regulatory processes of biofilm formation in E. coli.
Abstract
Aim
To verify synergistic effects, we investigated the antimicrobial activity of seven phenolic phytochemicals (gallic acid; epicatechin; epigallocatechin gallate; daidzein; genistein; myricetin; 3‐hydroxy‐6‐methoxyflavone) in combination with six antibiotics against multidrug‐resistant isolates from the ESKAPE group.
Methods and Results
To investigate single phytochemicals and combinations, initial microdilution and checkerboard assays were used, followed by time‐kill assays to evaluate the obtained results. The research revealed that phenolic compounds on their own resulted in little or no inhibitory effects. During preliminary tests, most of the combinations resulted in indifference (134 [71.3%]). In all, 30 combinations led to antagonism (15.9%); however, 24 showed synergistic effects (12.8%). The main tests resulted in nine synergistic combinations for the treatment of four different bacteria strains, including two substances (3‐hydroxy‐6‐methoxyflavone, genistein) never tested before in such setup. Time‐kill curves for combinations with possible synergistic effects confirmed the results against Acinetobacter baumannii as the one with the greatest need for research.
Conclusions
The results highlight the potential use of antibiotic–phytocompound combinations for combating infections with multi‐resistant pathogens. Synergistic combinations could downregulate the resistance mechanisms of bacteria.
Significance and Impact of the Study
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the potential use of phenolic natural compounds in combination with conventional antibiotics against multidrug‐resistant bacteria of the ESKAPE group. Due to synergistic effects of natural phenolic compounds combined with antibiotics, pathogens that are already resistant to antibiotics could be resensitized as we were able to reduce their MICs back to sensitive. In addition, combination therapies could prevent the development of resistance by reducing the dose of antibiotics. This approach opens up the basis for future development of antimicrobial therapy strategies, which are so urgently needed in the age of multidrug‐resistant pathogens.