Refine
Document Type
- Article (6)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- Diabetic retinopathy (2)
- retinopathy of prematurity (2)
- ADA (1)
- Age-related macular degeneration (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Biomarker (1)
- Diabetische Retinopathie (1)
- IDx-DR (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (1)
- MicroRNAs (1)
Institute
Publisher
- Wiley (2)
- American Medical Association (1)
- BMJ Publishing Group (1)
- S. Karger AG (1)
- Springer Nature (1)
Purpose
The German Retina.net ROP registry and its Europe-wide successor, the EU-ROP registry, collect data from patients treated for ROP. This analysis compares input parameters of these two registries to establish a procedure for joint analyses of different registry data using exemplary datasets from the two registries.
Methods
Exemplary datasets from the two databases over a 1-year period each (German Retina.net ROP Registry, 2011, 22 infants; EU-ROP Registry, 2021, 44 infants) were compared. The parameters documented in the two databases were aligned and analysed regarding demographic parameters, treatment modalities, complications within first 24 h and retreatments.
Results
The current analysis showed that data can be aligned for joint analyses with some adjustments within the data structure. The registry with more detailed data collection (EU-ROP) needs to be reduced regarding granularity in order to align the different registries, as the registry with lower granularity determines the level of analyses that can be performed in a comparative approach. In the exemplary datasets, we observed that the overall most common ROP severity in both registries was zone II, 3+ (2011: 70.5%; 2021: 65%), with decreasing numbers of clock hours showing preretinal neovascularisations (2011: 10–12 clock hours in 29% of cases, 2021: 4–6 clock hours in 38%). The most prevalent treatment method was laser coagulation in 2011 (75%) and anti-VEGF therapy in 2021 (86.1%). Within the anti-VEGF group, all patients were treated with bevacizumab in 2011 and with ranibizumab in 2021. Retreatment rates were comparable in 2011 and 2021.
Conclusion
Data from two different ROP registries can be aligned and jointly analysed. The analysis reveals a paradigm shift in treatment modalities, from predominantly laser to anti-VEGF, and within the anti-VEGF group from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in Germany. In addition, there was a trend towards earlier treatment in 2021.
Introduction: Vessel-associated retinal diseases are a major cause of blindness and severe visual impairment. The identification of appropriate biomarkers is of great importance to better anticipate disease progression and establish more targeted treatment options. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, single-stranded, noncoding ribonucleic acids that are involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression through hybridization with messenger RNA. The expression of certain miRNAs can be different in patients with pathological processes and can be used for the detection and differentiation of various diseases. In this study, we investigate to what extent previously in vitro identified miRNAs are present as cell-free circulating miRNAs in the serum and vitreous of human patients with and without vessel-associated retinal diseases. Methods: Relative quantification by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze miRNA expression in patients with vessel-associated retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and retinal vein occlusion compared with control patients. Results: In serum samples, miR-29a-3p and miR-192-5p showed increased expression in patients with neovascular AMD relative to control patients. Similarly, miR-335-5p, miR-192-5p, and miR-194-5p showed increased expression in serum from patients with proliferative DR. In vitreous samples, miR-100-5p was decreased in patients with proliferative DR. Differentially expressed miRNAs showed good diagnostic accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC curve analysis. Conclusion: The miRNAs investigated in this study may have the potential to serve as biomarkers for vessel-associated retinal diseases. Combining multiple miRNAs may enhance the predictive power of the analysis.
Purpose
Postapproval reports of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and occlusive retinal vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab are accumulating. A role of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to brolucizumab is under current scientific discussion. The purpose of the present study was to measure brolucizumab ADAs in a cross-sectional ophthalmic patient population and to compare the occurrence of brolucizumab ADAs with that of ranibizumab ADAs.
Methods
One hundred and ninety-two serum samples and 54 vitreous samples were collected from patients with a range of eye diseases including neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, cataract, glaucoma, dry eye disease, macular hole, epiretinal membranes and intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. Serum and vitreous samples were analysed for immune globuline (Ig) G ADAs to brolucizumab and ranibizumab using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Optical Density (OD) was read at 450 nm (wavelength correction at 550 nm) for ADA level measurements.
Results
Presence of brolucizumab ADAs was observed in patients with and without prior brolucizumab exposure. Both the frequency of notable ADA signals (OD > 0.1) and the mean ADA signal in serum samples were higher for brolucizumab than for ranibizumab. Two patients who experienced severe IOI and occlusive retinal vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab had high brolucizumab ADA serum levels. In one of these two patients, high brolucizumab ADA levels were also found in vitreous. Another patient developed moderate IOI without retinal vasculitis in the presence of low brolucizumab ADA serum levels. Overall, notable brolucizumab ADA levels were less frequent in vitreous than in the corresponding serum samples but with a tendency for higher prevalence in vitreous from patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Conclusion
Brolucizumab ADAs occur with significant prevalence in a typical ophthalmic patient population and may represent a risk factor for IOI and occlusive retinal vasculitis following brolucizumab.
Hintergrund
Seit 2018 ist mit IDx-DR ein Verfahren auf dem Markt, welches den Grad der diabetischen Retinopathie (DR) mittels künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) bestimmt.
Methoden
Wir haben IDx-DR in die Sprechstunde an einer diabetologischen Schwerpunktklinik integriert und berichten über die Übereinstimmung zwischen IDx-DR (IDx Technologies Inc., Coralville, IA, USA) und Funduskopie sowie IDx-DR und ophthalmologischer Bildbeurteilung sowie über den Einfluss unterschiedlicher Kamerasysteme.
Ergebnisse
Mit der Topcon-Kamera (n = 456; NW400, Topcon Medical Systems, Oakland, NJ, USA) konnte im Vergleich zur Zeiss-Kamera (n = 47; Zeiss VISUCAM 500, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Deutschland) häufiger eine ausreichende Bildqualität in Miosis erreicht werden. Insgesamt war bei etwa 60 % der Patienten eine IDx-DR-Analyse in Miosis möglich. Alle Patienten, bei denen keine IDx-DR-Analyse in Miosis möglich war, konnten in Mydriasis funduskopiert werden. Innerhalb der Gruppe der auswertbaren Befunde zeigte sich eine Übereinstimmung zwischen IDx-DR und augenärztlicher Funduoskopie in ca. 55 %, ein Überschätzen des Schweregrads durch IDx-DR in ca. 40 % und ein Unterschätzen in ca. 4 %. Die Sensitivität (Spezifität) für das Erkennen einer schweren, behandlungsbedürftigen Retinopathie lag bei 95,7 % (89,1 %) für Fälle mit auswertbaren Fundusaufnahmen und bei 65,2 % (66,7 %), wenn alle Fälle betrachtet werden (inklusive derjeniger ohne verwertbare Aufnahme in Miosis). Der Kappa-Koeffizient zeigt mit 0,334 (p < 0,001) eine ausreichende Übereinstimmung zwischen IDx-DR und ärztlicher Bildauswertung anhand des Fundusfotos unter Berücksichtigung aller Patienten mit auswertbarer IDx-DR-Analyse. Der Vergleich zwischen IDx-DR mit der ärztlichen Funduskopie ergibt unter denselben Voraussetzungen eine geringe Übereinstimmung mit einem Kappa-Wert von 0,168 (p < 0,001).
Schlussfolgerung
Die vorliegende Studie zeigt Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des KI-gestützten DR-Screenings auf. Eine wesentliche Einschränkung liegt in der Tatsache, dass bei ca. 40 % der Patienten keine ausreichenden Aufnahmen in Miosis gewonnen werden konnten. Wenn ausreichende Aufnahmen vorlagen, stimmten IDx-DR und augenärztliche Diagnose in über 50 % der Fälle überein. Ein Unterschätzen des Schweregrades durch IDx-DR kam selten vor. Für die Integration in augenärztlich unterstützten Sprechstunden erscheint uns das System grundsätzlich geeignet. Die hohe Rate an fehlenden Aufnahmen in Miosis stellt allerdings eine Limitation dar, die einen Einsatz ohne augenärztliche Kontrollmöglichkeit schwierig erscheinen lässt.
Importance: One of the biggest challenges when using anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents to treat retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the need to perform long-term follow-up examinations to identify eyes at risk of ROP reactivation requiring retreatment.
Objective: To evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)–based vascular severity score (VSS) can be used to analyze ROP regression and reactivation after anti-VEGF treatment and potentially identify eyes at risk of ROP reactivation requiring retreatment.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study was a secondary analysis of posterior pole fundus images collected during the multicenter, double-blind, investigator-initiated Comparing Alternative Ranibizumab Dosages for Safety and Efficacy in Retinopathy of Prematurity (CARE-ROP) randomized clinical trial, which compared 2 different doses of ranibizumab (0.12 mg vs 0.20 mg) for the treatment of ROP. The CARE-ROP trial screened and enrolled infants between September 5, 2014, and July 14, 2016. A total of 1046 wide-angle fundus images obtained from 19 infants at predefined study time points were analyzed. The analyses of VSS were performed between January 20, 2021, and November 18, 2022.
Interventions: An AI-based algorithm assigned a VSS between 1 (normal) and 9 (most severe) to fundus images.
Main Outcomes and Measures: Analysis of VSS in infants with ROP over time and VSS comparisons between the 2 treatment groups (0.12 mg vs 0.20 mg of ranibizumab) and between infants who did and did not receive retreatment for ROP reactivation.
Results: Among 19 infants with ROP in the CARE-ROP randomized clinical trial, the median (range) postmenstrual age at first treatment was 36.4 (34.7-39.7) weeks; 10 infants (52.6%) were male, and 18 (94.7%) were White. The mean (SD) VSS was 6.7 (1.9) at baseline and significantly decreased to 2.7 (1.9) at week 1 (P < .001) and 2.9 (1.3) at week 4 (P < .001). The mean (SD) VSS of infants with ROP reactivation requiring retreatment was 6.5 (1.9) at the time of retreatment, which was significantly higher than the VSS at week 4 (P < .001). No significant difference was found in VSS between the 2 treatment groups, but the change in VSS between baseline and week 1 was higher for infants who later required retreatment (mean [SD], 7.8 [1.3] at baseline vs 1.7 [0.7] at week 1) vs infants who did not (mean [SD], 6.4 [1.9] at baseline vs 3.0 [2.0] at week 1). In eyes requiring retreatment, higher baseline VSS was correlated with earlier time of retreatment (Pearson r = −0.9997; P < .001).
Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, VSS decreased after ranibizumab treatment, consistent with clinical disease regression. In cases of ROP reactivation requiring retreatment, VSS increased again to values comparable with baseline values. In addition, a greater change in VSS during the first week after initial treatment was found to be associated with a higher risk of later ROP reactivation, and high baseline VSS was correlated with earlier retreatment. These findings may have implications for monitoring ROP regression and reactivation after anti-VEGF treatment.
Background/Aims
Prematurely born infants undergo costly, stressful eye examinations to uncover the small fraction with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) that needs treatment to prevent blindness. The aim was to develop a prediction tool (DIGIROP-Screen) with 100% sensitivity and high specificity to safely reduce screening of those infants not needing treatment. DIGIROP-Screen was compared with four other ROP models based on longitudinal weights.
Methods
Data, including infants born at 24–30 weeks of gestational age (GA), for DIGIROP-Screen development (DevGroup, N=6991) originate from the Swedish National Registry for ROP. Three international cohorts comprised the external validation groups (ValGroups, N=1241). Multivariable logistic regressions, over postnatal ages (PNAs) 6–14 weeks, were validated. Predictors were birth characteristics, status and age at first diagnosed ROP and essential interactions.
Results
ROP treatment was required in 287 (4.1%)/6991 infants in DevGroup and 49 (3.9%)/1241 in ValGroups. To allow 100% sensitivity in DevGroup, specificity at birth was 53.1% and cumulatively 60.5% at PNA 8 weeks. Applying the same cut-offs in ValGroups, specificities were similar (46.3% and 53.5%). One infant with severe malformations in ValGroups was incorrectly classified as not needing screening. For all other infants, at PNA 6–14 weeks, sensitivity was 100%. In other published models, sensitivity ranged from 88.5% to 100% and specificity ranged from 9.6% to 45.2%.
Conclusions
DIGIROP-Screen, a clinical decision support tool using readily available birth and ROP screening data for infants born GA 24–30 weeks, in the European and North American populations tested can safely identify infants not needing ROP screening. DIGIROP-Screen had equal or higher sensitivity and specificity compared with other models. DIGIROP-Screen should be tested in any new cohort for validation and if not validated it can be modified using the same statistical approaches applied to a specific clinical setting.