Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- - (3)
- ACT-209905 (1)
- Compound 16 (1)
- GBM (1)
- PLZF (1)
- S1P (1)
- S1PR1 (1)
- S1PR2 (1)
- TME (1)
- autophagy (1)
Institute
Publisher
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation is an emerging epigenetic modification in recent years and epigenetic regulation of the immune response has been demonstrated, but the potential role of m6A modification in GBM tumor microenvironment (TME) cell infiltration and stemness remain unknown. The m6A modification patterns of 310 GBM samples were comprehensively evaluated based on 21 m6A regulators, and we systematically correlated these modification patterns with TME cell infiltration characteristics and stemness characteristics. Construction of m6Ascore to quantify the m6A modification patterns of individual GBM samples using a principal component analysis algorithm. We identified two distinct patterns of m6A modification. The infiltration characteristics of TME cells in these two patterns were highly consistent with the immunophenotype of the GBM, including the immune activation differentiation pattern and the immune desert dedifferentiation pattern. We also identified two modes of regulation of immunity and stemness by m6A methylation. Stromal activation and lack of effective immune infiltration were observed in the high m6Ascore subtype. Pan-cancer analysis results illustrate a significant correlation between m6AScore and tumor clinical outcome, immune infiltration, and stemness. Our work reveals that m6A modifications play an important role in the development of TME and stemness diversity and complexity. Patients with a low m6AScore showed significant therapeutic advantages and clinical benefits. Assessing the m6A modification pattern of individual tumors will help enhance our knowledge of TME infiltration and stemness characteristics, contribute to the development of immunotherapeutic strategies.
Sturgeons are among the most ancient linages of actinopterygians. At present, many sturgeon species are critically endangered. Surrogate production could be used as an affordable and a time-efficient method for endangered sturgeons. Our study established a method for identifying and isolating type A spermatogonia from different developmental stages of testes using flow cytometric cell sorting (FCM). Flow cytometric analysis of a whole testicular cell suspension showed several well-distinguished cell populations formed according to different values of light scatter parameters. FCM of these different cell populations was performed directly on glass slides for further immunocytochemistry to identify germ cells. Results showed that the cell population in gate P1 on a flow cytometry plot (with high forward scatter and high side scatter parameter values) contains the highest amount of type A spermatogonia. The sorted cell populations were characterized by expression profiles of 10 germ cell specific genes. The result confirmed that setting up for the P1 gate could precisely sort type A spermatogonia in all tested testicular developmental stages. The P2 gate, which was with lower forward scatter and side scatter values mostly, contained type B spermatogonia at a later maturing stage. Moreover, expressions of plzf, dnd, boule, and kitr were significantly higher in type A spermatogonia than in later developed germ cells. In addition, plzf was firstly found as a reliable marker to identify type A spermatogonia, which filled the gap of identification of spermatogonial stem cells in sterlet. It is expected to increase the efficiency of germ stem cell culture and transplantation with plzf identification. Our study thus first addressed a phenotypic characterization of a pure type A spermatogonia population in sterlet. FCM strategy can improve the production of sturgeons with surrogate broodstock and further the analysis of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of sturgeon germ cell development.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and most aggressive malignant tumor of the central nervous system in adults. The median survival time of patients suffering from GBM is only 14-15 months. Despite a great progress in the technique of resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapeutic drugs, survival time has not been significantly prolonged. Interestingly, the progression of GBM has been associated with intratumoral immune dysfunction states, and the GBM tissue represents a complex formation of tumor cells itself and diverse non-malignant cells such as endothelial cells, microglia or immunocompetent cells from peripheral blood. In that regard, accumulating evidence supports that Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) acts as a key signal in the cancer extracellular milieu. S1P has been intensively discussed to be an important pro-tumoral molecule, since it is involved in proliferation, migration and invasion of both healthy and malignant cells. An increase in S1P has been associated with proliferation and invasion of GBM and other cancers that display a propensity for brain metastasis. S1P binds to five different cell surface G protein-coupled receptors called S1P receptor 1-5 (S1PR1-5), it has been shown in previous studies that particularly the S1PR1 and 2 are involved in regulating proliferation, metastasis, invasion, vascular angiogenesis and maturation of GBM cells and thus play an important role in tumorigenesis. Therefore, we used S1PR1 (ACT-209905, W146) and S1PR2 modulators/antagonists (Compound 16, JTE013) to investigate the role of these S1P receptor subtypes in the growth of human (prGBM, LN18) and murine (GL261) GBM cells to gain insight into the molecular processes of the pro-tumorigenic S1P signaling cascade in GBM cells. Further, we analyzed the influence of the human monocytic cell line THP-1 on GBM cell growth by co-culture experiments together with simultaneous application of S1PR1/S1PR2 modulators/antagonists to determine the role played by S1PR1 and S1PR2 signaling pathways in the interaction between tumor and immune cells. We found that all tested S1PR1/2 modulators (ACT-209905, W146, Compound 16, JTE013) significantly reduced the viability (Resazurine assay) and vitality (Crystal violet assay) as well as the migration and invasion of prGBM, LN18 and GL261 cells in a concentration dependent manner. The growth inhibitory effect of S1PR1 blocking by ACT-209905 was accompanied by the induction of apoptosis in GBM cells seen by increased caspase 3 activity. When S1PR1 antagonist (ACT-209905, W146) was co-administered with S1PR2 antagonist (Compound 16, JTE013) the inhibitory effect was much stronger compared to the single administration. Further, single and dual application of S1PR1 modulator and S1PR2 antagonist caused a stronger inhibition of GBM cell viability and vitality compared to 100 μM Temozolomide (TMZ) as the standard chemotherapeutic for GBM. These results suggest that both S1PR1 and S1PR2 are involved in the growth of GBM cells and that a simultaneous inhibition of both receptors has synergistic effects. In addition, the influence of THP-1 cells as a model for human monocytes/macrophages on GBM cell growth was analyzed since it has been shown that S1P signaling polarizes macrophages to the pro-tumoral M2 phenotype and S1PR1 has been linked to macrophage activation. Co-culture of GBM cells with THP-1 cells or THP-1 conditioned medium significantly enhanced the viability and vitality as well as the migration and invasion of GBM cells in a cell number dependent manner suggesting that THP-1 cells might secrete to date unknown pro-tumoral molecules which stimulate the pro-invasive growth of GBM cells. Our FACS analyses showed that THP-1 cells express not only the CD11b macrophage marker but also CD163 and CD206 as marker for the pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype. Interestingly, the concomitant application of the S1PR1 modulator ACT-209905 had a significant inhibitory effect on the THP-1 induced increase of GBM cell growth and migration, which argues for a role of S1PR1 in the pro-tumoral characteristic of THP-1 on GBM cells. Immunoblot analyses further showed that blocking of the S1PR1 pathway leads to a reduced activation of several kinases including p38, AKT1 and ERK1/2 whereas THP-1 cells and THP-1 conditioned medium caused an activation of these kinases. To clarify the role of p38, AKT1 and ERK1/2 in the inhibitory effects of S1PR1 antagonists on GBM proliferation and migration in detail further studies are needed. Beside an impact on growth promoting kinases, S1PR1 blocking by ACT-209905 diminished surface expression (Median Fluorescence Intensity measured by FACS) of the pro-migratory molecules CD54 (ICAM-1) and CD166 (ALCAM), and reduced the percentage of CD62P (P-Selectin) positive GBM cells. In contrast, co-culture with THP-1 cells increased ICAM-1 and P-Selectin content of GBM cells which was reversed by ACT-209905 arguing for a role of ICAM-1 and P-Selectin in the migration of GBM cells. In conclusion, our study suggests a role of S1PR1 and S1PR2 signaling pathways in the growth and progression of GBM, improves our understanding of the complex mechanisms of S1P signaling in GBM cells, and gives at least a partial explanation for the pro-tumorigenic effects that macrophages might have on GBM cells combined with potential underlying mechanisms. Thus, this study argues for a further preclinical and clinical evaluation of a pharmacological modulation of S1PR1 and S1PR2 as a new or adjunctive therapeutic principle in GBM.
Over the past 10 years, the crisis of sepsis has remained a great challenge. According to data from 2016, the sepsis-related mortality rate remains high. In addition, sepsis consumes extensive medical resources in intensive care units, and anti-inflammatory agents fail to improve sepsis-associated hyperinflammation and symptoms of immunosuppression. The specific immune mechanism of sepsis remains to be elucidated. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are triggered by energy metabolism and respiratory dysfunction in sepsis, which not only cause oxidative damage to tissues and organelles, but also directly and indirectly promote NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation. NLRP3 inflammasomes enlarge the inflammatory response and trigger apoptosis of immune cells to exacerbate sepsis progression. Inhibiting the negative effects of ROS and NLRP3 inflammasomes therefore provides the possibility of reversing the excessive inflammation during sepsis. In this review, we describe the interaction of ROS and NLRP3 inflammasomes during sepsis, provide prevention strategies, and identify fields that need further study.