Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- epilepsy (7) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
- Frontiers Media S.A. (3)
- SAGE Publications (1)
- Sage (1)
Background:
Epileptic seizures can occur throughout the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) and are associated with increasing disability progression over time. However, there are no data on whether epileptic seizures at the onset of MS also lead to increasing disability.
Objective:
To examine disease progression over time for MS patients with epileptic seizures at onset.
Methods:
We analyzed the data of 30,713 patients on the German Multiple Sclerosis Register in a case–control study for more than 15 years. MS patients with seizures at onset were further divided into subgroups with polysymptomatic and monosymptomatic onset to assess the impact of additional symptoms on disease progression.
Results:
A total of 46 patients had seizures as onset symptoms. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) within the first year was lower in the group with seizures at onset compared to controls (0.75 versus 1.6, p < 0.05), which changed until the last reported visit (3.11 versus 3.0). Both subgroups revealed increased EDSS progression over time compared to controls.
Conclusion:
Epileptic seizures at MS onset are associated with a higher amount of disability progression over time. Additional longitudinal data are needed to further clarify the impact of seizures on the pathophysiology of MS disease progression.
Background:
Epilepsy development during the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered to be the result of cortical pathology. However, no long-term data exist on whether epilepsy in MS also leads to increasing disability over time.
Objective:
To examine if epilepsy leads to more rapid disease progression.
Methods:
We analyzed the data of 31,052 patients on the German Multiple Sclerosis Register in a case–control study.
Results:
Secondary progressive disease course (odds ratio (OR) = 2.23), age (OR = 1.12 per 10 years), and disability (OR = 1.29 per Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) point) were associated with the 5-year prevalence of epilepsy. Patients who developed epilepsy during the course of the disease had a higher EDSS score at disease onset compared to matched control patients (EDSS 2.0 vs 1.5), progressed faster in each dimension, and consequently showed higher disability (EDSS 4.4 vs 3.4) and lower employment status (40% vs 65%) at final follow-up. After 15 years of MS, 64% of patients without compared to 54% of patients with epilepsy were not severely limited in walking distance.
Conclusion:
This work highlights the association of epilepsy on disability progression in MS, and the need for additional data to further clarify the underlying mechanisms.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in a severely drug refractory cohort of patients with epileptic encephalopathies (EE).
Method: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients treated with EE who began treatment with BRV in an enrolling epilepsy center between 2016 and 2017.
Results: Forty-four patients (27 male [61%], mean age 29 years, range 6 to 62) were treated with BRV. The retention rate was 65% at 3 months, 52% at 6 months and 41% at 12 months. A mean retention time of 5 months resulted in a cumulative exposure to BRV of 310 months. Three patients were seizure free during the baseline. At 3 months, 20 (45%, 20/44 as per intention-to-treat analysis considering all patients that started BRV including three who were seizure free during baseline) were either seizure free (n = 4; 9%, three of them already seizure-free at baseline) or reported at least 25% (n = 4; 9%) or 50% (n = 12; 27%) reduction in seizures. An increase in seizure frequency was reported in two (5%) patients, while there was no change in the seizure frequency of the other patients. A 50% long-term responder rate was apparent in 19 patients (43%), with two (5%) free from seizures for more than six months and in nine patients (20%, with one [2 %] free from seizures) for more than 12 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events were predominantly of psychobehavioural nature and were observed in 16%.
Significance: In this retrospective analysis the rate of patients with a 50% seizure reduction under BRV proofed to be similar to those seen in regulatory trials for focal epilepsies. BRV appears to be safe and relatively well tolerated in EE and might be considered in patients with psychobehavioral adverse events while on levetiracetam.
Background
There is a lack of data concerning socioeconomic outcome and quality of life (QoL) in patients after status epilepticus (SE) in Germany.
Patients and methods
Adult patients treated between 2011 and 2015 due to SE at the university hospitals in Frankfurt, Greifswald, and Marburg were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding long-term outcome of at least 3 months after discharge. The SE cohort consisted of 25.9% patients with an acute symptomatic, 42% with a remote symptomatic and previous epilepsy, 22.2% with a new-onset remote symptomatic, and 9.9% with other or unknown etiology. A matched case–control analysis was applied for comparison with patients with drug refractory epilepsy and seizure remission, both not previously affected by SE.
Results
A total of 81 patients (mean age: 58.7 ± 18.0 years; 58% female) participated. A non-refractory course was present in 59.3%, while 27.2% had a refractory SE (RSE) and 13.6% had a superrefractory SE (SRSE). Before admission, a favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0–3 was found in 82.7% (67/81), deteriorating to 38.3% (31/81) (p = 0.003) at discharge. The majority returned home [51.9% (42/81)], 32.1% entered a rehabilitation facility, while 12.3% were transferred to a nursing home and 3.7% to another hospital. The overall mRS at follow-up did not change; 61.8% (45/74) reached an mRS of 0–3. In RSE and SRSE, the proportion with a favorable mRS increased from 45.5% at discharge to 70% at follow-up, while QoL was comparable to a non-refractory SE course. Matched epilepsy controls in seizure remission were treated with a lower mean number of anticonvulsants (1.3 ± 0.7) compared to controls with drug refractory epilepsy (1.9 ± 0.8; p < 0.001) or SE (1.9 ± 1.1; p < 0.001). A major depression was found in 32.8% of patients with SE and in 36.8% of drug refractory epilepsy, but only in 20.3% of patients in seizure remission. QoL was reduced in all categories (QOLIE-31) in SE patients in comparison with patients in seizure remission, but was comparable to patients with drug refractory epilepsy.
Discussion
Patients after SE show substantial impairments in their QoL and daily life activities. However, in the long term, patients with RSE and SRSE had a relatively favorable outcome comparable to that of patients with a non-refractory SE course. This underlines the need for efficient therapeutic options in SE.
202 Patienten (113 Frauen und 89 Männer im Alter von 25 bis 95 Jahren) mit einem ischämischen, supratentoriellem und territorialen Schlaganfall vorwiegend im Mediastromgebiet, wurden 9/2007 bis 6/2012 aus dem Patientengut der Stroke Unit der Neurologischen Klinik der Universitätsmedizin Greifswald für die monozentrische Studie zur Häufigkeit epileptischer Anfälle sowie ihrer Provokationsfaktoren rekrutiert.
Bei einem durchschnittlichen Beobachtungszeitraum von 36,5 Monaten erlitten 39 Patienten (19,3%) mindestens einen epileptischen Anfall. Davon hatten 12 Patienten einen akut symptomatischen Anfall und 27 einen unprovozierten Anfall. Bei 21 Patienten traten rezidivierende Anfälle auf. Wendet man die aktualisierte Definition der ILAE für Epilepsie an, so hatten 31 (15,3%) Patienten eine Epilepsie und 8 (4%) einen einzelnen akutsymptomatischen Anfall. Damit hatte unsere Studie die bisher höchste dokumentierte Rate an Epilepsie nach einer Ischämie. Der erste epileptische Anfall trat dabei überwiegend im 1. Jahr nach erlittenem Schlaganfall auf. Es zeigte sich, dass Patienten mit einer geringeren Schwere des Schlagfalls (erfasst mittels NIHSSS und mRS) ein geringeres Risiko für die Entwicklung eines epileptischen Anfalls hatten. Alter und Geschlecht zeigten keine Korrelation zum Auftreten eines epileptischen Anfalls.
96 Patienten (53 Frauen und 43 Männer) erhielten innerhalb der ersten 6 h nach dem Schlaganfall eine auswertbare PCT, davon hatten 17 (17,7%) mindestens einen epileptischen Anfall. Mit Hilfe der PCT wurden für die einzelnen Perfusionsparameter CBF, CBF und TTP der ASPECTS, das Perfusionsdefizit und die relativen Perfusionsparameter bestimmt. Bei dem ASPECTS CBF und ASPECTS CBV zeigte sich, dass die vorderen Mantelregionen M1 und M4 bzw. nur M1 bei den Patienten mit einem epileptischen Anfall signifikant häufiger einen geringeren CBF oder ein geringeres CBV hatten. Ein signifikanter Unterschied ergab sich auch beim Betrachtung der Perfusionsdefizite in Bezug auf den CBF und das CBV: Patienten mit einem epileptischer Anfall zeigten ein größeres Perfusionsdefizit als die Patienten ohne epileptischen Anfall. In die relativen Perfusionsparameter fließt neben dem Perfusionsdefizit noch die Infarktgröße ein. Zwar ergab sich kein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen den beiden Gruppen in Bezug auf die Infarktgröße, trotzdem konnte eine Korrelation zwischen einem erniedrigten R[CBF] bzw. einem erniedrigten R[CBV] und dem Auftreten von epileptischen Anfällen nach einem ischämischen Schlaganfall feststellt werden.
About 30 % of epileptic patients are non-responsive to multidrug antiepileptic therapy. One of non-responsiveness in epilepsy hypothesis claims that non-responsiveness occurs because of reduced access of antiepileptic drugs to their targets, as a result of increased efflux of antiepileptic drugs away from these targets. Transporters believed to be involved in non-responsiveness in epilepsy are mainly but not exclusively the members of the ABC superfamily including P-gp (MDR1, ABCB1), MRP1 (ABCC1), MRP2 (ABCC2) and others. These proteins are normally found in the blood-brain barrier and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier where they function as protectors. There is emerging evidence that P-gp, MRP1 and MRP2 are up-regulated in epileptogenic brain tissue. The risk of non-responsiveness could be related also to the MDR1 or MRP2 gene polymorphisms. We hypothesised that changes in expression and function of multidrug transporters involved in non-responsiveness of epilepsy might be detectable not only in the brain but also in other tissues such as lymphocytes. Therefore we evaluated the expression of MDR1, MRP1 and MRP2 and function of P-gp in lymphocytes in patients with epilepsy and healthy subjects. Three groups of epileptic patients and 15 healthy subjects as a control group were included in the study. The patients’ group was defined as follows: Monotherapy – patients treated with carbamazepine monotherapy, without seizures - corresponded to group responders. Combined therapy – patients after monotherapy (two different medicines have been tried) and combined therapy (two trials of combined therapy), not free of seizures. Monotherapy and combined therapy groups each embraced 15 patients. Neurosurgery – patients who had undergone neurosurgery, afterwards were or were not additionally treated with carbamazepine, with or without seizures. This group comprised 24 patients. Combined therapy and neurosurgery groups composed the group of non-responders. The mRNA expression of MRP1, MRP2 and MDR1 by means of quantitative real-time PCR as well as MRP2 and P-gp protein content by Western blot in lymphocytes was measured. For P-gp functional analysis rhodamine efflux from lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells was performed. The influence of the polymorphisms C3435T, G2677T/A in the MDR1 gene and C24T, G1249A, C3972T in the MRP2 gene for the transporters expression, function and their association with non-responsive epilepsy phenotype was investigated. Our results showed that MRP1 expression in lymphocytes was significantly lower in epileptics than in healthy subjects. Non-responders had lower MRP1 mRNA content in lymphocytes than responders. We did not find any difference in MRP2 expression between epileptics and healthy volunteers. MRP2 mRNA levels in lymphocytes were higher in non-responders than in responders. However, at protein level epileptic patients had significantly lower MRP2 content in lymphocytes than controls. MRP2 protein content did not differ in responders and non-responders. There was no reliable correlation between MRP2 mRNA expression and MRP2 protein content in lymphocytes. Epileptics had significantly lower MDR1 expression in lymphocytes than healthy individuals. MDR1 expression was decreasing according to the consumption of antiepileptic drugs and seizures frequency: patients after neurosurgery had significantly lower MDR1 expression than patients after combined therapy and monotherapy. MDR1 expression was significantly lower in non-responders than in responders. At protein level epileptics had lower P-gp content than controls. Detected P-gp amount in lymphocytes did not differ between responders and non-responders. Rhodamine efflux from lymphocytes and NK cells did not differ significantly between epileptics and healthy subjects, but it was higher in patients after neurosurgery than in patients after monotherapy. Rhodamine efflux from NK cells, which are known to express the highest levels of P-gp, was significantly higher in non-responders than in responders. In this study, we showed that MRP1 mRNA expression in lymphocytes was significantly correlated to its expression in the brain. We detected also a significant co-correlation between MRP1 expression in the hippocampus and MDR1 expression in lymphocytes. We found no evidence regarding the impact of the MDR1 polymorphisms on mRNA expression, P-gp content and rhodamine efflux from lymphocytes. Our data showed lack of evidence regarding the impact of the MRP2 polymorphisms on mRNA expression and protein content. We did not detect any association between MDR1 or MRP2 polymorphisms and non-responsiveness in epilepsy or epilepsy in the main. In conclusion, our results suggest that lymphocytes are an appropriate surrogate for studies on changes of multidrug transporters expression in epilepsy. Lymphocytes as an easily accessible tissue might serve as a marker for responsiveness to antiepileptic drug therapy in epilepsy studies.