Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Motivation (3) (remove)
Institute
Background: Common to most theory-based intervention approaches is the idea of supporting intentions to increase the probability of behavior change. This principle works only if (a) intentions can be explained by the hypothesized socio-cognitive constructs, and (b) people actually do what they intend to do. The overall aim of this thesis was to test these premises using two health behavior theories applied to reducing at-risk alcohol use. Method: The three papers underlying this thesis were based on data of the randomized controlled “Trial Of Proactive Alcohol interventions among job-Seekers” (TOPAS). A total of 1243 job-seekers with at-risk alcohol use were randomized to stage tailored intervention (ST), non-stage tailored intervention (NST), or control group. The ST participants (n = 426) were analyzed in paper 1. Paper 2 was based on the baseline and 3-month data provided by the NST participants (n = 433). Paper 3 was based on baseline, 3-, 6-, and 15-month data provided by the control and ST group not intending to change alcohol use (n = 629). Latent variable modeling was used to investigate the associations of social-cognitive constructs and intentional stages (paper 1), the extent to which intentions were translated into alcohol use (paper 2), and the different trajectories of alcohol use among people not intending to change as well as the ST effect on the trajectories (paper 3). Results: Persons in different intentional stages differed in the processes of change in which they engaged, in the importance placed by them on the pros and cons of alcohol use, and in the perceived ability to quit (ps < 0.01). The association between intentions and alcohol use was weak. The magnitude of this intention-behavior gap depended on the extent to which normative expectations have changed over time (p < 0.01) and was reduced when controlling for the mediating effect of temporal stability of intentions. The gap was also present among people not intending to change: Even without intervention, 35% of the persons reduced the amount of alcohol use after 15 months (p < 0.05) and 2% achieved abstinence. Persons with heavier drinking (33%) and persons with low but frequent use (30%) did not change. Persons with frequent alcohol use seem to benefit less from ST than those with occasional use, although differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Intentions can be quite well explained by the hypothesized socio-cognitive constructs. In a sample of persons who were, as a whole, little motivated to change, the precision of how well intentions predict subsequent alcohol use was modest though. Time and socio-contextual influences should be considered.
Alcohol-related somatic disorders are highly prevalent among general hospital inpatients. Alcohol problem drinking can be differentiated into alcohol use disorders (alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse) and three subtypes of drinking above recommended levels (at-risk drinking only [AR], heavy episodic drinking only [HE], at-risk and heavy episodic drinking [ARHE]). The aims of this study were threefold. First, proportions of alcohol problem drinking among general hospital inpatients in a region of north-eastern Germany were estimated (study 1). Second, among individuals with alcohol problem drinking the association between beverage preference and alcohol-related diseases was tested (study 2). Third, subtype differences regarding demographics, alcohol-related variables, motivation to change drinking behaviors, and the risk to develop short-term alcohol dependence among the three subtypes of drinking above recommended levels were analyzed (study 3). The data presented in this dissertation are based on the randomized controlled trial “Early Intervention at General Hospitals”, which is part of the Research Collaboration Early Substance Use Intervention (EARLINT). Study 1 includes a sample of consecutively admitted general hospital inpatients between 18 and 64 years old (n = 14,332). The study adopted a two-stage-sampling approach: (a) screening and (b) ascertainment of alcohol problem drinking. Those who were identified with alcohol problem drinking were asked for written consent for further study participation. This included further baseline assessment, the consent to use routine treatment diagnoses and participation in a follow-up interview 12 months after hospitalization. For study 2, routine treatment diagnoses were provided by hospital physicians for a total of 1,011 men with problem drinking. These diagnoses were classified into three categories according to their alcohol-attributable fractions (AAF): diseases totally attributable to alcohol by definition (AAF=1), diseases partially attributable to alcohol (AAF<1) and diseases with no empirical relationship to alcohol or with a possibly protective effect associated with alcohol (AAF=0). Study 3 was restricted to study participants with drinking above recommended levels (n=425). Study 1: Among all general hospital inpatients, 8.9% were identified with current problem drinking in the following descending order: 5.3% exhibited alcohol use disorders and 3.6% drinking above recommended levels. Higher proportions of problem drinking were found at rural sites compared to urban sites (13.7 vs. 7.5%, p<.001). Study 2: Because of the low proportion of women with alcohol problem drinking the following analyses were restricted to males. Multinomial regression analyses revealed different risks for alcohol-related diseases in relation to beverage preference while controlling for alcohol-associated and demographic confounders. Compared to all other groups, spirits only drinkers had the highest risk for having a disease with AAF>0; e.g., beer only drinkers had lower odds of having a disease with AAF<1 (odds ratio, OR=0.50, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.27-0.92). Study 3: Men with alcohol use disorder were excluded from the following analysis. At baseline, multinomial logistic regression revealed differences between individuals with AR, HE and ARHE while controlling for age. ARHE was associated with higher odds of having a more severe alcohol problem (OR=2.06, CI: 1.23-3.45), using formal help (OR=2.21, CI: 1.02-4.79), and having a disease with AAF=1 (OR=3.43, CI: 1.58-7.43), compared with AR. In addition, individuals with ARHE had higher odds of taking action to change drinking behaviors (i.e., beginning to implement change) than individuals with HE (OR=2.29, CI: 1.21-4.34) or AR (OR=2.11, CI: 1.15-3.86). At follow-up, individuals with ARHE had higher odds of having alcohol dependence according to the DSM-IV (OR=4.73, CI: 1.01–22.20) compared to individuals with AR. In addition to alcohol use disorders, drinking above recommended levels is a common problem among general hospital inpatients. Thus, the implementation of systematic alcohol screening and brief interventions should be considered. These data suggest an association between beverage preference and alcohol-related diseases. Among hospitalized problem drinkers, spirits only drinkers had the greatest risk of having diseases with AAF>0. Of the three subtypes of drinking above recommended levels, ARHE seems to be particularly problematic because there appears to be an indication of a subclinical diagnosis. To provide adequate intervention, clinical practice should distinguish between the three groups of drinking above recommended levels. Brief alcohol intervention should be tailored to the individual’s motivation to change and to the type of alcohol problem drinking. The effectiveness of such a procedure remains to be evaluated in further studies.
Background: Alcohol consumption accounts for a high burden of disease. The general population of West Pomerania has been characterized as a population at risk with a high prevalence of behavioural risk factors such as alcohol risk drinking. This is reflected by the high proportion of patients being admitted to general hospitals due to alcohol-attributable diseases. The aims of the present dissertation were (a) to analyze dose-response relations between volume of alcohol drinking and the risk of diseases with different alcohol-attributable fractions (AAF) in general hospital inpatients (study 1); (b) to assess motivation to change drinking behaviour and motivation to seek help for alcohol problems during their hospital stay as well as changes in motivation to change drinking behaviour, motivation to seek help and changes in daily alcohol consumption across time according to diseases with different AAFs (study 2); and (c) to investigate the association of fatty liver disease (FLD) with blood pressure and hypertension in a general population sample and to test for the specific contribution of alcohol consumption to this association (study 3). Methods: For studies 1 and 2, data from 'Early Intervention at General Hospitals', a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of brief intervention for alcohol problem drinking in general hospitals, were used. Study 1 comprised data from 846 inpatients, study 2 comprised data from 294 inpatients aged 18 to 64 years with alcohol problem drinking and alcohol-attributable diseases from four general hospitals in West Pomerania. Hospital diagnoses were classified according to their AAF: (1) diseases wholly attributable to alcohol consumption by definition (AAF=1), (2) diseases partially attributable to alcohol consumption (AAF<1), and (3) diseases with no relation to alcohol consumption or where alcohol consumption has been found to be a protective factor (AAF=0). Study 3 encompassed data from the 'Study of Health in Pomerania', a general population sample of 3191 adults aged 20-79 years. FLD was defined using ultrasound in combination with increased serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Results: Analyses showed that 46.8% of the general hospital inpatients had a disease attributable to alcohol consumption. There was a dose-response relationship between volume of alcohol drinking and the risk of diseases with different AAFs. Inpatients consuming >120 g and inpatients consuming 61-120 g of pure alcohol per day revealed significantly higher odds for diseases with AAF=1 compared to inpatients consuming 31-60 g of pure alcohol per day with odds ratios (OR) of 6.3 (95% CI 3.6-11.3) and 2.9 (95% CI 1.6-5.1), respectively. Regarding diseases with AAF<1, inpatients consuming >120 g of pure alcohol per day had significantly higher odds compared to inpatients consuming 31-60 g of pure alcohol per day (OR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4). Analyses on motivation to change drinking behaviour and on motivation to seek help at hospitalization revealed that motivation to change drinking behaviour was higher among inpatients with alcohol-attributable diseases than among inpatients without alcohol-attributable diseases (p<.001). Among inpatients with AAF=1, motivation to seek help was higher than among inpatients with AAF<1 and AAF=0 (p<.001). While motivation to change drinking behaviour remained stable within one year after hospitalization in all three AAF groups, motivation to seek help decreased in this time period. The volume of alcohol consumed decreased in all three AAF groups within one year after hospitalization. Data from the general population study revealed that FLD was associated with blood pressure and hypertension at baseline and at five-year examination follow-up. For example, the chance of hypertension at both time points was threefold higher in individuals with FLD (OR 2.8, CI 1.3-6.2; OR 3.1, CI 1.7-5.8, respectively) compared to individuals without FLD. Analyses further revealed that the association of FLD with blood pressure and hypertension was independent of alcohol consumption. Conclusion: The results of the present dissertation provide relevant implications for public health. In view of the high proportion of general hospital inpatients with alcohol-attributable diseases, a screening procedure for problem drinking is needed. Furthermore, appropriate interventions considering the inpatient’s motivational level have to be implemented. The concept of AAFs to classify disease conditions according to their causal relationship with alcohol consumption might be a tool to detect inpatients with problem drinking. The results regarding FLD and its association with blood pressure and hypertension demonstrate that it is important to pay attention to alcohol-attributable diseases in the general population and that alcohol-attributable diseases are associated with subsequent serious sequelae. The results of the present work further indicate that the concept to distinguish between alcoholic and non-alcoholic origin of FLD might be obsolete and should be replaced by a concept that regards FLD as a multifactorial disease condition.