Refine
Document Type
- Article (7)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- - (4)
- Bias (1)
- Caries (1)
- Caries decline (1)
- Caries prevention (1)
- Cariology (1)
- Children (1)
- Community dentistry (1)
- Correct toothbrushing (1)
- Dental education (1)
Institute
Publisher
- S. Karger AG (3)
- MDPI (2)
- Springer Nature (2)
This paper reviews the first part of the outcomes of the ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium 2014 dealing with ‘caries epidemiology and community dentistry: chances for future improvements in caries risk groups'. After the caries decline in many countries, there are remaining pockets of higher caries levels, mostly in the primary dentition and/or linked to a low socio-economic status (SES). The review into the evidence of caries-preventive measures clearly points to the use of fluorides, especially toothbrushing with fluoridated toothpaste and collective measures such as water fluoridation. In contrast to several unsuccessful high-risk approaches, community and public health programmes seem to be able to ensure a population-wide access and compliance in risk groups. Their simple and evidence-based measures mostly combine regular plaque removal and fluoride applications via toothbrushing, at least for children and adolescents. For the future, the common risk factor approach which addresses associations between oral health, social deprivation, diet, hygiene, smoking, alcohol use and stress should lead to combined efforts with other community health and education specialists. Further engagement with public policy, community leaders and administration is needed in order to strengthen healthy choices and behaviour, e.g. in ‘healthy' schools and kindergartens. It seems advisable that these population programmes also aim at improving upstream factors.
The European Organisation for Caries Research education platform 2020 had the aim to assess the undergraduate curriculum in cariology in Asian and Arabian countries in order to support structured teaching of cariology in these countries with about almost half of the global population. Representatives of 4 Asian and 4 Arabian countries completed a comprehensive questionnaire on structure of dental education in their country in general and the extent, the content, the responsibilities, structure and standardization regarding cariology in particular. In spite of a wide range from very few universities (Lebanon 3) to larger numbers of dental schools (India 313, China 121, Russia 52) there were similar statements on the list of content for cariology teaching. Often the catalogue was close to the Undergraduate Core Curriculum in Cariology (UCCC) covering most of the 5 domains from basic science to dental public health, but a national curriculum for cariology or dentistry was mostly missing. With various departments being involved, a need of coordination is obvious. Most representatives thought it possible and feasible to teach a standardized curriculum in cariology on the basis of the UCCC. In conclusion, many Arabian and Asian countries have implemented modern, evidence-based curricula in their universities, but an obligatory national curriculum in cariology would be advisable to standardize the quality in teaching.
Less invasive caries management techniques for treating cavitated carious primary teeth, which involve the concept of caries control by managing the activity of the biofilm, are becoming common. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy (minor/major failures) and survival rates (successful cases without any failures) of 3 carious lesion treatment approaches, the Hall Technique (HT), non-restorative caries treatment (NRCT), and conventional restorations (CR), for the management of occlusoproximal caries lesions (ICDAS 3-5) in primary molars. Results at 2.5 years are presented. A total of 169 children (3- to 8-year-olds) were enrolled in this secondary care-based, 3-arm parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Participants were allocated to: HT (n = 52; sealing caries with stainless-steel crowns without caries removal), NRCT (n = 52; opening up the cavity and applying fluoride varnish), CR (n = 65; control arm, complete caries removal and compomer restoration). Statistical analyses were: non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U test and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. One hundred and forty-two participants (84%; HT = 40/52; NRCT = 44/52; CR = 58/65) had follow-up data of 1-33 months (mean = 26). Overall, 25 (HT = 2, NRCT = 9, CR = 14) of 142 participants (17.6%) presented with at least 1 minor failure (reversible pulpitis, caries progression, or secondary caries; p = 0.013, CI = 0.012-0.018; Mann-Whitney U test). Ten (HT = 1, NRCT = 4, CR = 5) of 142 participants (7.04%) experienced at least 1 major failure (irreversible pulpitis, abscess, unrestorable tooth; p = 0.043, CI = 0.034-0.045). Independent comparisons between 2 samples found that NRCT-CR had no statistically significant difference in failures (p > 0.05), but for CR-HT (p = 0.037, CI = 0.030-0.040) and for NRCT-HT (p = 0.011, CI = 0.010-0.016; Kruskal-Wallis test) significant differences were observed. Cumulative survival rates were HT = 92.5%, NRCT = 70.5%, and CR = 67.2% (p = 0.012). NRCT and CR outcomes were comparable. HT performed better than NRCT and CR for all outcomes. This study was funded by the Paediatric Dentistry Department, Greifswald University, Germany (Trial registration No. NCT01797458).
To assess whether the treatment of children with oral midazolam and pediatric hypnosis techniques can improve the compliance in consecutive sessions, a retrospective longitudinal practice-based observational study was designed and carried out. A total of 311 children between 3 and 12 years of age were treated under hypnosis and sedation with midazolam (0.40 mg/kg body weight). Treatments were performed in one to a maximum of three sessions. A total of 183 children received one, 103 received two and 25 children received three treatment sessions. The behavior of the children during the sessions was examined by means of the Venham score. The self-evaluation of the children was based on the Wong–Baker Scale. Child behavior using midazolam and hypnosis techniques showed little difference and good compliance between the sessions. Venham scores did not increase significantly regarding total treatment from the first (0.99 ± 1.41) to the second (1.17 ± 1.39) and to the third session (1.27 ± 1.20) (p > 0.05). However, considering the highest Venham scores that occurred in each case, the behavior of the children worsened significantly (p < 0.01) during the three treatment sessions, from 1.37 ± 1.31 (first) to 1.87 ± 1.74 (second) to 2.32 ± 1.33 (third). In 6.11% of the children, treatment was discontinued in the first session (n = 19), 0.96% in the second (n = 3) and 0% in the third. Treatment with low-dose midazolam, combined with hypnosis techniques, showed to be an effective option for dental treatment in children. Within the limitations of the current study, and with consideration of highest possible compliance, no more than two treatment sessions for pediatric dental treatment should be performed.
Ziel: Das richtige Zähneputzen ist für Kinder ein komplizierter Prozess. Ziel dieser Studie war es daher, die Wirkung des häuslichen, differenziellen Lernens zur Verbesserung des Zähneputzens zu untersuchen.
Methoden: In dieser prospektiven, kontrollierten, einfach verblindeten, randomisierten klinischen Studie wurden 44 Kinder (Alter: 5,6 ± 1,6 Jahre; 24 weiblich, Baseline QHI [Quigley-Hein-Index] > 3, PBI [Papillenblutungsindex] > 0,3, mittlerer dmft = 9 bzw. DMFT = 1,6) zufällig einer Test- und einer Kontrollgruppe (jede Gruppe n = 22) zugeteilt, indem das Kind selbst einen unbeschrifteten Umschlag aus einer Kiste zog. Alle Kinder erhielten die Anweisungen und Informationen zur Mundhygiene in diesen verschlossenen Umschlägen und wurden aufgefordert, diese Anweisungen zu Hause zu befolgen. Lediglich die Kinder der Testgruppe erhielten Instruktionen mit Übungen nach der Methodik des differenziellen Lernens, während die Kinder der Kontrollgruppe Instruktionen zum Putzen nach der KAI-Putztechnik erhielten. Bei Studienbeginn und Follow-ups nach 4 und 12 Wochen wurden Plaque- und Gingivaindizes (QHI, PBI) in beiden Gruppen durch 2 kalibrierte und verblindete Untersucher (L.L. und M.K.) erhoben.
Ergebnisse: Zu Studienbeginn gab es keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen der Test- und der Kontrollgruppe in Bezug auf Plaque- und Gingivaindizes (QHI: 4,2 ± 0,5 und 4,2 ± 0,5; p = 0,9; PBI: 0,7 ± 0,4 und 0,6 ± 0,2; p = 0,8). Bei den Follow-ups nach 4 und 12 Wochen zeigten beide Gruppen bessere Mundgesundheitsindizes, die Testgruppe aber insgesamt deutlicher. Der Unterschied bei den Plaqueindizes verfehlte knapp die statistische Signifikanz (4-Wochen-Recall; QHI/Test: 2,1 ± 0,9; Kontrolle: 2,6 ± 0,9; p = 0,1). Dagegen zeigte sich im 4-Wochen-Recall bereits ein statistisch signifikanter Unterschied bezüglich der Gingivaindizes (PBI/Test: 0,1 ± 0,2 vs. Kontrolle: 0,4 ± 0,2; p <0,001). Beim 12-Wochen-Recall zeigte die Testgruppe statistisch signifikante und klinisch relevante bessere Mundgesundheitsindizes als die Kontrollgruppe (12-Wochen-Recall, QHI/Test: 1,9 ± 0,8 vs. Kontrolle: 3,3 ± 0,9; p <0,001; PBI/Test: 0,1 ± 0,1 vs. Kontrolle: 0,5 ± 0,2; p <0,001).
Schlussfolgerungen: Schlussfolgernd kann festgestellt werden, dass das differenzielle Lernen auch bei Kindern mit hohem Kariesrisiko und initial schlechter Mundhygiene zu Mundhygieneverbesserungen führt, die der konventionellen Lernmethode durch Wiederholung mittelfristig überlegen ist.
(1) Background: In Germany, new recommendations for dental examinations of children and the use of fluorides have been introduced. The pediatrician (PA) should refer the patient to the dentist for dental examinations and check-ups (DEs) from the sixth month of age. Therefore, our aim was to determine with a questionnaire the extent to which PAs find DE useful, make referrals for DE and recommend fluoride. (2) Methods: The nationwide empirical survey was conducted with a self-developed and validated standardized online questionnaire. In addition to personal information, 16 items were collected. Agreement with the items was recorded using Likert scales. The data were primarily analysed descriptively. (3) Results: 696 PAs participated in the survey (age: 51.7 (8.4) years, women/men: 428/286 (61.5/38.5%). A total of 11% of PAs found referral by eruption of first tooth very important (important/neutral/unimportant: 13.8/32/43.2%), compared to 70% for complete deciduous teeth (21.3/7.3/1.4%). A total of 48.8% of PAs always recommended fluoridated toothpaste from the first tooth (often/occasionally/rarely/never: 18.3/7.8/8/17.1%) and 50.6% completely refused to recommend fluoride-free toothpaste (always/often/occasionally/rarely: 9.8/9/14.7/15.9%). A total of 44.8% never recommended the use of fluoridated toothpaste if the child cannot yet spit (always/often/occasionally/rarely: 19.2/13.9/7.8/14.3%). (4) Conclusions: Among PAs, referral to DEs was increasingly implemented as children grew older. Specific fluoride recommendations were accepted.
Purpose
The significance of the underlying literature in clinical guidelines can be weakened by the risk of bias, which could negatively affect the recommendations. Especially in controversial matters, such as fluoride use for caries prevention in children, biased results may be not reliable and lead to incorrect conclusions. This study was performed to detect bias in underlying literature of the German guideline for caries prevention using fluoride in children, where no consensus was reached between paediatricians and paediatric dentists.
Methods
Three tools used for risk of bias assessments of different study designs were RoB 2 for RCTs, ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies, and ROBIS for systematic reviews. For each study cited in the guideline two independent risk of bias assessments were performed. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Results
Out of 58 papers, 48.3% (n = 28) showed high risk of bias, with the majority in sections regarding fluoride tablets, fluoridated toothpaste, and paediatricians’ recommendations. 9 out of 20 recommendations and statements were based on studies with high risk of bias, all of which were in these three controversial sections. 13 out of 29 RCTs showed high risk of bias (44.8%), as all 13 non-randomized trials did, while only 2 of 16 (12.5%) systematic reviews had high risk of bias.
Conclusion
Considering risk of bias of cited studies in clinical guidelines may result in substantial changes in its recommendations and aid in reaching consensus. Efforts should be made to assess risk of bias of underlying literature in future clinical guidelines.