Open Access

A long-standing controversy in emotion research concerns the question whether stimuli must be conceptually interpreted, or semantically categorized, to evoke emotional reactions. According to the semantic primacy hypothesis, the answer to this question is positive; whereas according to the affective primacy hypothesis, it is negative: Emotions can also be, and perhaps often are, elicited by preconceptual stimulus representations, such as particular shapes or color patterns. In the present dissertation project, the semantic primacy hypothesis was tested in eight experiments using different latency judgment paradigms in which the perceptual latencies of object recognition and affect onset were measured and compared. The chronometric measurement methods comprised temporal judgments (temporal order judgments and simultaneity judgments: Publication A, Experiments 1–4; the rotating spot / rotating clock hand method: Publication B, Experiments 1–2) and speeded reaction time measurements (Publication C, Experiments 1–2). To elicit affective responses, pictures of pleasant (e.g., cats, children) and unpleasant objects (e.g., spiders, moldy food) from everyday life were presented. According to the semantic primacy hypothesis, object recognition is a necessary partial cause of affect. This implies the following three predictions that were tested in the studies: (1) Because causes must precede their effects, the time of the onset of object recognition must precede the time of the onset of affect. (2) The longer it takes a person to recognize an object, the longer it should also take them, other factors constant, to experience affect; therefore, the latencies of the two mental events should be positively correlated across individuals. (3) An experimental manipulation that delays the onset of object recognition (in this case a moderate blurring of the pictures) should also delay the onset of affect, and the effect of the manipulation on affect latency should be mediated by the delay in object recognition. In agreement with Prediction 1, regardless of the chronometric method used, the latency of object recognition consistently proved to be shorter than the latency of affect onset. According to the meta-analytically integrated latency differences estimated in the temporal judgment experiments, affect followed object recognition with a delay of 117 ms. This result was obtained for both pleasant and unpleasant stimuli and was independent of task order. Supporting Prediction 2, the latencies for object recognition and affect onset were positively correlated across participants (meta-analytic r = .50). Supporting Prediction 3, delaying object recognition by blurring the affective pictures was found to also delay the onset of affect and the effect of blurring on the latency of affect was found to be partly mediated by delayed object recognition. Two additional predictions tested and confirmed in Experiment C2 were: (4) False-coloring the affective pictures delays the onset of affect but not object recognition, and this effect is mediated by reduced affect intensity. (5) Judgments of the valence of the stimuli (i.e., whether the imaged object is pleasant or unpleasant) take more time than reports of object recognition, but less time than affect onset reports, for which valence judgments have often been used as a substitute in previous studies. Taken together, the results of the eight experiments provided consistent support for semantic primacy in the generation of pleasant and unpleasant feelings evoked by affective pictures: Object recognition can be considered a necessary partial cause of affect in the reported experiments. The results are compared to previous findings, possible reasons for deviant response patterns found in a small minority of the participants are considered, and several implications of the findings for emotion research are derived. Possible adaptations of the chronometric approach to investigate other questions of emotion research are suggested. Finally, limitations of the dissertation project are pointed out and possible ways to address these in future research are proposed.

Gefahrenlagen, wie schwere Unwetter, Terroranschläge oder die COVID-19-Pandemie, stellen aktuell und zukünftig eine Bedrohung unserer Gesellschaft dar. Im Fall dieser und weiterer Gefahren können Warnungen helfen, Schäden zu verhindern und Menschenleben zu retten, indem sie die Empfänger*innen informieren und Schutzmaßnahmen vermitteln. Das Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) (Lindell & Perry, 2012) bietet einen theoretischen Rahmen, der Verarbeitungsprozesse von Warnungen und die Entstehung von Schutzverhalten abbildet. Neben zahlreichen weiteren Elementen beinhaltet das PADM die Wahrnehmung von Risiko als zentralen Faktor. Im Sinne des Modells sowie bereits existierender Literatur wird Risikowahrnehmung jedoch häufig ausschließlich kognitiv abgebildet. Zudem untersuchen Studien vorwiegend einzelne Gefahrenlagentypen oder singuläre Ereignisse. Die vorliegende Arbeit bildet mit drei Beobachtungsstudien sowie einer experimentellen Studie Verarbeitungsprozesse von Warnungen vor verschiedenen Gefahrenlagen ab. Untersucht wurde der Einfluss der Warnungen auf kognitive und affektive Facetten der Risikowahrnehmung und ihre Rolle bei der Suche nach Informationen sowie der Intention, Schutzverhalten auszuführen. Über Online-Befragungen erhielten die Teilnehmenden Warnungen zu verschiedenen Gefahrenlagen (schweres Unwetter, Großbrand, extreme Gewalttat, Ausfall der Notrufnummer, Fund einer Weltkriegsbombe, COVID-19-Pandemie, Gewitter), die Informationen zur Gefahr sowie Handlungsempfehlungen enthielten. Befragt wurden sie unter anderem hinsichtlich ihrer Risikowahrnehmung vor und nach Warnerhalt sowie ihrer Intention, die angegebenen Schutzmaßnahmen zu befolgen oder sich Informationen zu suchen. Zudem wurden Eigenschaften der Warnungsempfänger*innen erhoben. Die Ergebnisse stärken die Rolle affektiver Risikowahrnehmung für die Verarbeitung von Warnungen sowie die Entstehung von Schutzverhalten und Informationssuche. Dies gilt jedoch nicht für alle Gefahrenlagen gleichermaßen, sodass der Einfluss von Eigenschaften der Gefahr, wie Häufigkeit oder Schweregrad, deutlich wird. Bezüglich der Eigenschaften der Empfänger*innen ergab sich ebenfalls kein einheitliches Bild. Basierend auf den Ergebnissen wird eine Erweiterung des PADM um ein Modellelement der affektiven Risikowahrnehmung vorgeschlagen. Fortführende Forschung zu Warnungen sollte eine multifacettierte Sichtweise von Risikowahrnehmung anstreben. Darüber hinaus sollten Gefahrenlagen vergleichend untersucht und ihre Eigenschaften sowie Eigenschaften der Warnungen systematisch variiert werden.

Abstract Background The need to optimize exposure treatments for anxiety disorders may be addressed by temporally intensified exposure sessions. Effects on symptom reduction and public health benefits should be examined across different anxiety disorders with comorbid conditions. Methods This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared two variants of prediction error‐based exposure therapy (PeEx) in various anxiety disorders (both 12 sessions + 2 booster sessions, 100 min/session): temporally intensified exposure (PeEx‐I) with exposure sessions condensed to 2 weeks (n = 358) and standard nonintensified exposure (PeEx‐S) with weekly exposure sessions (n = 368). Primary outcomes were anxiety symptoms (pre, post, and 6‐months follow‐up). Secondary outcomes were global severity (across sessions), quality of life, disability days, and comorbid depression. Results Both treatments resulted in substantial improvements at post (PeEx‐I: dwithin = 1.50, PeEx‐S: dwithin = 1.78) and follow‐up (PeEx‐I: dwithin = 2.34; PeEx‐S: dwithin = 2.03). Both groups showed formally equivalent symptom reduction at post and follow‐up. However, time until response during treatment was 32% shorter in PeEx‐I (median = 68 days) than PeEx‐S (108 days; TRPeEx‐I = 0.68). Interestingly, drop‐out rates were lower during intensified exposure. PeEx‐I was also superior in reducing disability days and improving quality of life at follow‐up without increasing relapse. Conclusions Both treatment variants focusing on the transdiagnostic exposure‐based violation of threat beliefs were effective in reducing symptom severity and disability in severe anxiety disorders. Temporally intensified exposure resulted in faster treatment response with substantial public health benefits and lower drop‐out during the exposure phase, without higher relapse. Clinicians can expect better or at least comparable outcomes when delivering exposure in a temporally intensified manner.

Body dissatisfaction is pervasive among young women in Western countries. Among the many forces that contribute to body dissatisfaction, the overrepresentation of thin bodies in visual media has received notable attention. In this study, we proposed that prevalence-induced concept change may be one of the cognitive mechanisms that explain how beauty standards shift. We conducted a preregistered online experiment with young women (N = 419) and found that when the prevalence of thin bodies in the environment increased, the concept of being overweight expanded to include bodies that would otherwise be judged as “normal.” Exploratory analyses revealed significant individual differences in sensitivity to this effect, in terms of women’s judgments about other bodies as well as their own. These results suggest that women’s judgments about other women’s bodies are biased by an overrepresentation of thinness and lend initial support to policies designed to increase size-inclusive representation in the media.

Zusammenfassung. Die Vereinbarkeit von Wissenschaft und Familie ist für Eltern im Allgemeinen und Frauen im Besonderen eine große Herausforderung. Tagungsteilnahmen sind wichtige Karrierebausteine und eine organisatorische Herausforderung für Eltern. In diesem Positionspapier wird ein Stimmungsbild zu familienfreundlicheren Kongressgestaltung in der Fachgruppe (FG) Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs) erfragt. 147 FG-Mitglieder (Rücklaufquote: 18.36 %) beantworteten Fragen zur Demographie, sowie Einstellungen gegenüber der FG-Tagung, Betreuungsmöglichkeiten und familienfreundlichen Maßnahmen. Von den Teilnehmenden waren 66 % Eltern, 45 % sagten wegen familiärer Verpflichtungen die FG-Tagung ab. Zusätzliche Kosten durch familiäre Verpflichtungen wurden als hoch eingeschätzt und familienfreundlichere Maßnahmen von vielen Teilnehmenden gewünscht. Familienfreundliche Konferenzen können ein klares Signal der Inklusion und Solidarität setzen und für die Aufrechterhaltung und Nachhaltigkeit wissenschaftlicher Kompetenz sorgen. Konkrete Empfehlungen für eine familienfreundliche Konferenzgestaltung werden als Checkliste im elektronischen Anhang zur Verfügung gestellt.