Refine
Document Type
- Article (53)
Language
- English (53)
Has Fulltext
- yes (53)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (53)
Keywords
- - (22)
- Alzheimer’s disease (4)
- cerebrospinal fluid (4)
- free light chain kappa (4)
- metabolomics (4)
- periodontitis (4)
- immunoglobulin (3)
- obesity (3)
- protein analytic (3)
- Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (2)
Institute
- Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin (12)
- Institut für Community Medicine (9)
- Kliniken und Polikliniken für Innere Medizin (9)
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (8)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (4)
- Institut für Biochemie (3)
- Institut für Pharmakologie (3)
- Institut für Immunologie u. Transfusionsmedizin - Abteilung Immunologie (2)
- Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung, Parodontologie und Endodontologie (2)
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie (1)
- Institut für Biometrie und Medizinische Informatik (1)
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie und Neuroradiologie (1)
- Institut für Med. Biochemie u. Molekularbiologie (1)
- Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (1)
- Interfakultäres Institut für Genetik und Funktionelle Genomforschung (UMG) (1)
- Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie - Klinikum Karlsburg (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie Abt. für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie/Plastische Operationen (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (1)
- Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Präventive Zahnmedizin und Kinderzahnheilkunde (1)
- Poliklinik für zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde (1)
- Zentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde (1)
Publisher
- MDPI (14)
- Wiley (7)
- Frontiers Media S.A. (6)
- Nature Publishing Group (6)
- S. Karger AG (5)
- Springer Nature (5)
- SAGE Publications (4)
- BioMed Central (BMC) (2)
- AO Research Institute Davos (1)
- BioScientifica (1)
Introduction
Neurofilament light (NfL) can be detected in blood of healthy individuals and at elevated levels in those with different neurological diseases. We investigated if the choice of biological matrix can affect results when using NfL as biomarker in epidemiological studies.
Method
We obtained paired serum and EDTA-plasma samples of 299 individuals aged 37–67 years (BiDirect study) and serum samples of 373 individuals aged 65–83 years (MEMO study). In BiDirect, Passing–Bablok analyses were performed to assess proportional and systematic differences between biological matrices. Associations between serum or EDTA-plasma NfL and renal function (serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate, and kidney disease) were investigated using linear or logistic regression, respectively. All regression coefficients were estimated (1) per one ng/L increase and (2) per one standard deviation increase (standardization using z-scores). In MEMO, regression coefficients were estimated (1) per one ng/L increase of serum or calculated EDTA-plasma NfL and (2) per one standard deviation increase providing a comparison to the results from BiDirect.
Results
We found proportional and systematic differences between paired NfL measurements in BiDirect, i.e., serum NfL [ng/L] = −0.33 [ng/L] + 1.11 × EDTA-plasma NfL [ng/L]. Linear regression coefficients for the associations between NfL and renal function did not vary between the different NfL measurements. In MEMO, one standard deviation increase in serum NfL was associated with greater changes in the outcomes than in BiDirect.
Conclusion
Although there are differences between serum and EDTA-plasma NfL, results can be used interchangeably if standardized values are used.