Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)
  • search hit 1 of 24
Back to Result List

Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, wenn Sie dieses Dokument zitieren oder verlinken wollen: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-107761

Continuum beliefs of mental illness: a systematic review of measures

  • Purpose The continuum of mental health/illness has been subject to scientific debate for decades. While current research indicates that continuum belief interventions can reduce mental health stigma and improve treatment seeking in affected populations, no study has yet systematically examined measures of continuum beliefs. Methods This preregistered systematic review summarizes measures of continuum beliefs. Following the PRISMA statement, three scientific databases (PubMed, PsycInfo and PsycArticles via EBSCOhost, Web of Science) are searched, instruments are described and discussed regarding their scope, and methodological quality. Results Overall, 7351 records were identified, with 35 studies reporting relevant findings on 11 measures. Most studies examined general population samples and used vignette-based measures. Schizophrenia and depression were most commonly examined, few studies focused on dementia, ADHD, OCD, eating disorders, and problematic alcohol use, or compared continuum beliefs across disorders. Validity was very good for most measures, but reliability was rarely tested. Measures mostly assessed beliefs in the normality of mental health symptoms or the normality of persons with such symptoms but rarely nosological aspects (i.e., categorical v continuous conceptualization of mental disorders). Conclusions Current research provides psychometrically sound instruments to examine continuum beliefs for a variety of mental disorders. While studies suggest utility for general population samples and mental health professionals, more research is necessary to corroborate findings, for instance, regarding age (e.g., in adolescents), gender, or type of mental disorder. Future research should also compare self-report ratings, and vignette-based measures, include measures of nosological concepts to fully grasp the continuum concept of mental illness. Preregistration PROSPERO: CRD42019123606.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author: Samuel TomczykORCiD, S. Schlick, T. Gansler, Thomas McLaren, Holger MuehlanORCiD, Lina-Jolien Peter, Georg Schomerus, Silke SchmidtORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:gbv:9-opus-107761
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02345-4
ISSN:1433-9285
Parent Title (English):Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Publisher:Springer Nature
Place of publication:Berlin
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2022/08/05
Date of first Publication:2023/01/01
Release Date:2024/02/28
Tag:Assessment; Continuum; Mental health; Public health; Stereotyping; Systematic review
Volume:58
Issue:1
First Page:1
Last Page:16
Faculties:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Psychologie
Collections:weitere DFG-förderfähige Artikel
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 International