Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (101)
- Article (99)
Language
- English (111)
- German (88)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (200)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (200)
Keywords
- - (44)
- Demenz (9)
- Epidemiologie (8)
- Dementia (7)
- Prävention (7)
- dementia (7)
- Lebensqualität (6)
- Diabetes mellitus (5)
- prevention (5)
- Gesundheitsverhalten (4)
Institute
- Institut für Community Medicine (200) (remove)
Publisher
- MDPI (21)
- BioMed Central (BMC) (19)
- Frontiers Media S.A. (14)
- S. Karger AG (12)
- Wiley (7)
- Public Library of Science (PLoS) (6)
- Nature Publishing Group (4)
- BMJ Publishing Group (3)
- JMIR Publications (3)
- Springer Nature (2)
An already existing shortage of nurses was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Inactive (former) nurses were regarded as a so-called silent reserve and were called upon by various agencies to volunteer for nursing. The question arose as to what factors might encourage or hinder such volunteering and facilitate deployment.
First, inactive nurses were asked via an online survey whether they had registered for deployment or not and what the reasons were for this decision. Further information on professional background was collected, including the reason for having left the profession in the first place. Based on the results of the online survey, focus group discussions were conducted with registered and unregistered inactive nurses, with nurses who had returned to the profession permanently, and with care home managers.
Only one third of the participants in the online survey said they had registered for a temporary assignment during the pandemic. The main reasons for registering were that inactive nurses ‘wanted to do their bit’ to manage the crisis, felt it was their duty and/or felt a sense of belonging to the nursing profession. The main reasons given for not having registered was that respondents ‘could not see a reason at the moment’, had health concerns, and ‘other relevant job commitments’. The majority of respondents still had jobs related to health, care or nursing.
The topics covered in the focus group discussions included the following: perception of the pandemic as a crisis, identity as a nurse and sense of professional commitment, role of current occupation in the decision to register, winning over inactive nurses with a very negative attitude towards returning to care during a crisis situation, support measures and offers regarding a deployment in nursing.
Both in the online survey and in the focus group discussions, a sense of belonging to the nursing profession was evident among many participants. However, this identity does not necessarily lead to a willingness to return to nursing during a crisis situation. Weighing up the risk of deployment against the positive or negative experiences gained during the active period can influence willingness. However, the possibility of taking a break from current work and returning to nursing at short notice is not always given. Many inactive nurses continue to work in the health sector and fulfil equally important tasks during a crisis situation which render them unavailable for deployment.
Different kinds of support for those willing to return to nursing during a crisis situation and communication on conditions of deployments need to be implemented and continuously improved to offer the inactive nurses the greatest possible security and to enable a largely unbureaucratic deployment.
Our study examined whether potentially critical indications from depression questionnaires, interviews, and single items on suicidal ideation among partici-pants in a large prospective population-based study are related to short-term sui-cides within one year. For this purpose, we studied the association between (a) the severity of depressive symptoms according to the M-CIDI and the PHQ-9, BDI-II, and CID-S depression screening and (b) elevated scores on single sui-cidal ideation items and mortality according to claims databases.
In the baseline cohort, the frequency of depressive symptoms measured by CID-S was 12.90% (SHIP-START-0). The frequency for “Moderate” to “Severe de-pression” measured by the PHQ-9 (≥ 10 points) and BDI-II (≥ 20 points) ques-tionnaires ranged from 5.40% (SHIP-LEGENDE) to 8.80% (SHIP-TREND Morbid-ity follow-up). The 1-month prevalence of unipolar depression, measured by the M-CIDI in SHIP LEGENDE, was 2.31%.
Between 5.90% (SHIP-TREND Morbidity follow-up) and 6.60% (SHIP-LEGENDE) of respondents showed a certain degree of suicidal ideation in the two weeks preceding the assessment, according to BDI-II and PHQ-9.
Our results show the high frequency of depressive symptoms in the study region, with women being affected more frequently than men, especially in the higher categories. Furthermore, women were more frequently affected by suicidal idea-tion, although this difference was not evident in the highest categories.
There was one potential suicide in the year after a SHIP examination.
From our results, we cannot conclude that severe self-reported symptoms from depression questionnaires should be reported back to participants of an obser-vational population-based study to prevent suicide deaths within one year.
Hintergrund:
Kardiovaskuläre Präventionsleitlinien empfehlen unterschiedliche Instrumente zur kardiovaskulären 10-Jahres-Risikobestimmung. In der hausärztlichen Praxis wird dafür häufig das arriba-Instrument verwendet und durch die Leitlinie „Hausärztliche Risikoberatung zur kardiovaskulären Prävention“ empfohlen. Ziel der Studie ist die Validierung der arriba-Risikoprädiktion auf Basis von Morbiditäts- und Mortalitätsdaten der bevölkerungsbasierten Study of Health in Pomerania.
Methoden:
In einer retrospektiven Längsschnittanalyse wurde für Probanden ohne vorheriges kardiovaskuläres Ereignis das kardiovaskuläre 10-Jahres-Gesamtrisiko (Myokardinfarkt oder Schlaganfall) zur Basisuntersuchung mit dem arriba-, SCORE-Deutschland- und PROCAM-Algorithmus (Myokardinfarkt) berechnet. Aus Daten der Folgeuntersuchungen wurden kardiovaskuläre Ereignisraten ermittelt und Diskriminierungs- und Kalibrierungsmaße für die Risikobestimmungsinstrumente berechnet.
Ergebnisse:
In die Analyse wurden 2277 Proband:innen (Durchschnittsalter 53 ± 13 Jahre, 50% Männer) eingeschlossen. Nach durchschnittlich 10,2 Jahren betrug die kardiovaskuläre Ereignisrate 8,6% (196/2277). Das Verhältnis aus prädizierter und beobachteter Ereignisrate betrug für Proband:innen mit niedrigem, mittlerem und hohem kardiovaskulären Risiko 0,8, 1,5 und 1,3. Arriba unterschätzte bei Frauen und überschätzte in den Altersgruppen 30-44 und 45-59 Jahren die kardiovaskulären Ereignisraten.
Schlussfolgerung:
Diskriminierungswerte für das arriba-Instrument sind mit SCORE-Deutschland und PROCAM vergleichbar, eine individuelle Anpassung an die Zielpopulation ist jedoch nötig.
Aims
To investigate factors that influence the willingness of inactive nurses to return to nursing in a crisis situation and to identify aspects that need to be considered with regard to a possible deployment.
Design
A deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis of semi-structured focus group interviews.
Methods
Semi-structured focus group interviews with inactive or marginally employed nurses, nurses who have been inactive for some time and nursing home managers in October and November 2021. The participating inactive nurses had declared their willingness for a deployment during the COVID-19 pandemic or not. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
Communication was seen as essential by the participants for an informed decision for or against a temporary return to nursing and to potential or actual deployments. To make them feel safe, inactive nurses need to know what to expect and what is expected of them, for example, regarding required training and responsibilities. Considering their current employment status, some flexibility in terms of deployment conditions is needed.
A remaining attachment to care can trigger a sense of duty. Knowledge of (regular) working conditions in nursing can lead to both a desire to support former colleagues and a refusal to be exposed to these conditions again.
Conclusion
Past working experiences and the current employment situation play a major role in the willingness of inactive nurses to return to nursing in a crisis situation. Unbureaucratic arrangements must be provided for those who are willing to return.
Summary Statement
What already is known - In crisis situations, not every inactive nurse is willing or able to return to nursing and therefore, the ‘silent reserve’ may not be as large as suspected.
What this paper adds - Inactive nurses need to know what to expect and what is expected of them for their decision regarding a return to active patient care during a crisis situation.
Implications for practice/policy – Inactive nurses need to be informed and should be offered free training and refresher courses to ensure patient safety.
Impact
This research shows that the group of inactive nurses are not a silent workforce which can be activated anytime. Those who are able and willing to return to direct patient care in crisis situations need the best possible support – during and between crises.
Reporting Method
This study adhered to COREQ guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution
The involvement of patients or members of the public did not apply for the study, as the aim was to gain insight into the motivations and attitudes of the group of inactive nurses.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social-emotional developmental risks (SE-DR) of preschool children is largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this prospective longitudinal dynamic cohort study was to assess changes in preschoolers’ SE-DR from before the pandemic to after the first COVID-19 wave. SE-DR were assessed annually with the instrument “Dortmund Developmental Screening for Preschools” (DESK). Longitudinal DESK data from 3- to 4-year-old children who participated both in survey wave (SW) three (DESK-SW3, 2019) and SW four (DESK-SW4, 2020) from August 1 to November 30 were used, respectively. Additionally, data from previous pre-pandemic SW were analyzed to contextualize the observed changes (SW1: 2017; SW2: 2018). A total of N = 786 children were included in the analysis. In the pre-pandemic DESK-SW3, the proportion of children with SE-DR was 18.2%, whereas in DESK-SW4 after the first COVID-19 wave, the proportion decreased to 12.4% (p = 0.001). Thus, the prevalence rate ratio (PRR) was 0.68. Compared to data from previous SW (SW1-SW2: PRR = 0.88; SW2-SW3: PRR = 0.82), this result represents a notable improvement. However, only short-term effects were described, and the study region had one of the highest preschool return rates in Germany. Further studies are needed to examine long-term effects of the pandemic on preschoolers’ SE-DR.
This dynamic cohort was established to evaluate the targeted individual promotion of children affected by developmental risks as part of the German federal state law for child day-care and preschools in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. The project has been conducted in preschools in regions with a low socio-economic profile since 2011. Since 2017, the revision of the standardized Dortmund Developmental Screening for Preschools (DESK 3–6 R) has been applied. Developmental risks of 3 to 6-year-old children in the domains of motor, linguistic, cognitive and social competencies are monitored. The cohort is followed up annually. In 2020, n = 7,678 children from n = 152 preschools participated. At the baseline (2017), n = 8,439 children participated. Due to the defined age range of this screening, 3,000 to 4,000 5-6-year-old children leave the cohort annually. Simultaneously, an approximately equal number of 3-year-old children enters the cohort per survey wave. N = 702 children participated in all 4 survey waves. On the basis of DESK 3–6 R scores available from survey waves 2017 to 2019 it is possible to compute expected values for the survey wave 2020 and to compare those with the measured values to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e. parental home care due to restrictions related to COVID-19).
Hintergrund
Die chronische Nierenkrankheit (CKD) ist eine häufige Erkrankung, insbesondere im höheren Alter. Um der Progression der Erkrankung und deren Komplikationen vorzubeugen, ist eine leitliniengerechte ambulante Versorgung von Patient:innen mit CKD anzustreben. Zur Messung und Bewertung der Versorgungsqualität können Qualitätsindikatoren (QI) genutzt werden. In Deutschland existieren bisher keine QI für CKD. Ziel der Arbeit war die Entwicklung von QI für die Qualitätsüberprüfung der ambulanten Versorgung von Patient:innen über 70 Jahren mit nichtdialysepflichtiger CKD.
Material und Methoden
Auf Grundlage der nationalen S3-Leitlinie CKD und eines Reviews internationaler QI wurde eine Liste von QI erstellt. Die ausgewählten QI wurden in 2 Sets eingeteilt: basierend auf Routinedaten (z. B. Abrechnungsdaten der Krankenkassen) und auf Datenerhebung in der Praxis (Chart-Review). Expert:innen verschiedener Fachrichtungen sowie ein Patient:innenvertreter bewerteten diese in einem Delphi-Verfahren mit 2‑stufiger Onlinebefragung im Oktober 2021 und Januar 2022 und abschließender Konsensuskonferenz im März 2022. Zusätzlich wurden Ranglisten der wichtigsten QI von jedem Set erstellt.
Ergebnisse
Ein Inzidenz- und ein Prävalenzindikator wurden a priori festgelegt und standen nicht zur Abstimmung. Weitere 21 QI standen zur Abstimmung durch die Expert:innen. Für jedes QI-Set wurden die 7 wichtigsten Indikatoren ausgewählt. Nur 1 QI wurde von dem Expert:innenpanel für den zusätzlichen Einsatz bei Erwachsenen unter 70 Jahren als nicht geeignet eingestuft.
Diskussion
Die QI sollen es ermöglichen, die Qualität der ambulanten Versorgung von Patient:innen mit CKD zu untersuchen, mit dem Ziel, die leitlinienkonforme ambulante Versorgung zu optimieren.
Background
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with chronic conditions face a transfer, defined as an actual shift from paediatric to adult-oriented health care. Transition competence as the self-perceived knowledge, skills and abilities regarding the transition process was considered extremely useful.
Aim
This study was designed to investigate the impact of transition competence before and after the transfer on disease-specific quality of life (QoL) and health care satisfaction of AYAs with diabetes.
Results
In total, a sample of N = 90 AYAs with diabetes self-reported their transition competence, diabetes-specific QoL and satisfaction with care. Multiple linear regressions were used to analyse the impact of transition competence on satisfaction with care and QoL. Transition competence positively influenced the outcomes of satisfaction with care and QoL.
Conclusion
Young adults with diabetes showed higher transition competence scores than adolescents with diabetes.
In rural areas, healthcare providers, patients and relatives have to cover long distances. For specialised ambulatory palliative care (SAPV), a supply radius of max. 30 km is recommended. The aim of this study was to analyse whether there are regional disparities in the supply of SAPV and whether it is associated with the distance between the SAPV team’s site and the patient’s location. Therefore, anonymised data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (M-V) were retrospectively analysed for the period of 2014–2017. Identification as a palliative patient was based on palliative-specific items from the ambulatory reimbursement catalogue. In total, 6940 SAPV patients were identified; thereof, 48.9% female. The mean age was 73.3 years. For 28.3% of the identified SAPV patients (n = 1961), the SAPV teams had a travel distance of >30 km. With increasing distance, the average number of treatment days per patient increased. It was found that there are regional disparities in the provision of SAPV services in M-V and that local structures have an important impact on regional supply patterns. The distance between the SAPV team’s site and the patient’s location is not the only determining factor; other causes must be considered.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to test whether brief alcohol interventions at general hospitals work equally well for males and females and across age-groups.
Methods: The current study includes a reanalysis of data reported in the PECO study (testing delivery channels of individualized motivationally tailored alcohol interventions among general hospital patients: in PErson vs. COmputer-based) and is therefore of exploratory nature. At-risk drinking general hospital patients aged 18–64 years (N = 961) were randomized to in-person counseling, computer-generated individualized feedback letters, or assessment only. Both interventions were delivered on the ward and 1 and 3 months later. Follow-ups were conducted at months 6, 12, 18, and 24. The outcome was grams of alcohol/day. Study group × sex and study group × age interactions were tested as predictors of change in grams of alcohol/day over 24 months in latent growth models. If rescaled likelihood ratio tests indicated improved model fit due to the inclusion of interactions, moderator level-specific net changes were calculated.
Results: Model fit was not significantly improved due to the inclusion of interaction terms between study group and sex (χ2[6] = 5.9, p = 0.439) or age (χ2[6] = 5.5, p = 0.485).
Discussion: Both in-person counseling and computer-generated feedback letters may work equally well among males and females as well as among different age-groups. Therefore, widespread delivery of brief alcohol interventions at general hospitals may be unlikely to widen sex and age inequalities in alcohol-related harm.