Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- - (2)
- 18S rRNA (1)
- DNA extraction bias (1)
- DNA preservation (1)
- FGF21 (1)
- HPTLC (1)
- Niemann–Pick disease type C1 (1)
- S1P (1)
- behaviour (1)
- biofilm (1)
Institute
Niemann–Pick type C1 (NPC1) is a lysosomal storage disorder, inherited as an
autosomal-recessive trait. Mutations in the Npc1 gene result in malfunction of the NPC1 protein,
leading to an accumulation of unesterified cholesterol and glycosphingolipids. Beside visceral
symptoms like hepatosplenomegaly, severe neurological symptoms such as ataxia occur. Here,
we analyzed the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor (S1PR) axis in different brain regions
of Npc1−/− mice and evaluated specific effects of treatment with 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin
(HPβCD) together with the iminosugar miglustat. Using high-performance thin-layer chromatography
(HPTLC), mass spectrometry, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot analyses, we
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4502; doi:10.3390/ijms21124502 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4502 2 of 31
studied lipid metabolism in an NPC1 mouse model and human skin fibroblasts. Lipid analyses
showed disrupted S1P metabolism in Npc1−/− mice in all brain regions, together with distinct changes
in S1pr3/S1PR3 and S1pr5/S1PR5 expression. Brains of Npc1−/− mice showed only weak treatment
effects. However, side effects of the treatment were observed in Npc1+/+ mice. The S1P/S1PR axis
seems to be involved in NPC1 pathology, showing only weak treatment effects in mouse brain. S1pr
expression appears to be affected in human fibroblasts, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived
neural progenitor and neuronal differentiated cells. Nevertheless, treatment-induced side effects
make examination of further treatment strategies indispensable
Abstract
DNA extraction and preservation bias is a recurring topic in DNA sequencing‐based microbial ecology. The different methodologies can lead to distinct outcomes, which has been demonstrated especially in studies investigating prokaryotic community composition. Eukaryotic microbes are ubiquitous, diverse, and increasingly a subject of investigation in addition to bacteria and archaea. However, little is known about how the choice of DNA preservation and extraction methodology impacts perceived eukaryotic community composition. In this study, we compared the effect of two DNA preservation methods and six DNA extraction methods on the community profiles of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes in phototrophic biofilms on seagrass (Zostera marina) leaves from the Baltic Sea. We found that, whereas both DNA preservation and extraction method caused significant bias in perceived community composition for both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, extraction bias was more pronounced for eukaryotes than for prokaryotes. In particular, soft‐bodied and hard‐shelled eukaryotes like nematodes and diatoms, respectively, were differentially abundant depending on the extraction method. We conclude that careful consideration of DNA preservation and extraction methodology is crucial to achieving representative community profiles of eukaryotes in marine biofilms and likely all other habitats containing diverse eukaryotic microbial communities.