Institut für Community Medicine
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (108)
- Doctoral Thesis (106)
Language
- English (121)
- German (92)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (214)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (214)
Keywords
- - (44)
- Demenz (12)
- Epidemiologie (8)
- Dementia (7)
- Lebensqualität (7)
- Prävention (7)
- dementia (7)
- Diabetes mellitus (5)
- Versorgung (5)
- prevention (5)
Institute
- Institut für Community Medicine (214)
- Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie und Neuroradiologie (2)
- Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin (2)
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (2)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (2)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie/Plastische Operationen (2)
- Institut für Immunologie u. Transfusionsmedizin - Abteilung Transfusionsmedizin (1)
- Institut für Psychologie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (1)
Publisher
- MDPI (22)
- BioMed Central (BMC) (21)
- Frontiers Media S.A. (15)
- S. Karger AG (12)
- Wiley (7)
- Nature Publishing Group (6)
- Public Library of Science (PLoS) (6)
- JMIR Publications (4)
- BMJ Publishing Group (3)
- Springer Nature (2)
Background
Up to 27% of the German population suffers from recurrent or persistent pain (lasting more than three months). Therefore, prevention of chronic pain is one major object of pain management interventions. The aim of this nationwide, multicentre, randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week ambulatory (outpatient) interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (A-IMPT) for patients with recurrent pain and at risk of developing chronic pain. This project was initiated by the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e.V.) and the public health insurance provider BARMER. It is currently funded by the German Innovation Fund (01NVF20023). The study PAIN2.0 focuses on reducing pain intensity and pain-related disability and investigates whether this intervention can improve physical activity, psychological well-being, and health literacy.
Methods
PAIN2.0 is designed as a multicentre 1:1 randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups (randomisation at the patient level, planned N = 1094, duration of study participation 12 months, implemented by 22 health care facilities nationwide). After 6 months, patients within the control group also receive the intervention. The primary outcomes are pain intensity and pain-related impairment, measured as Characteristic Pain Intensity (PI) and Disability Score (DS) (Von Korff), as well as patient-related satisfaction with the intervention. Secondary outcomes are the number of sick leave days, sickness allowance, treatment costs, psychological distress, health-related quality of life, and catastrophizing. The effects of the intervention will be analysed by a parallel-group comparison between the intervention and control groups. In addition, the long-term effects within the intervention group will be observed and a pre-post comparison of the control group before and after the intervention will be performed.
Discussion
Recurrent or persistent pain is common in the German population and causes high costs for patients and society. The A-IMPT aims to improve pain and pain-related impairments in pain patients at risk of chronification, thereby reducing the risk of developing chronic pain with its high socioeconomic burden. This new therapy could easily be integrated into existing therapy programs if positively evaluated.
Trial registration
The trial PAIN2.0 has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) since 21/11/2022 with the ID DRKS00030773.
Recently, the parameter internal work (IW) has been introduced as change in oxygen uptake (VO2) between resting and unloading workload in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The proportional IW (PIW) was defined as IW divided by VO2 at peak exercise. A second option is to calculate the PIW based on the workload [PIW (Watt)] by considering the aerobic efficiency. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IW and PIW differ between patients with and without pulmonary hypertension and healthy controls. Our study population consisted of 580 patients and 354 healthy controls derived from the Study of Health in Pomerania. The PIW was slightly lower in patients (14.2%) than in healthy controls (14.9%; p = 0.030), but the PIW (Watt) was higher in patients (18.0%) than in the healthy controls (15.9%; p = 0.001). Such a difference was also observed, when considering only the submaximal workload up to the VAT (19.8% in patients and 15.1% in healthy controls; p < 0.001). Since the PIW (Watt) values were higher in patients with pulmonary hypertension, this marker may serve as a useful CPET parameter in clinical practice. In contrast to most of the currently used CPET parameters, the PIW does not require a maximal workload for the patient. Further studies are needed to validate the prognostic significance of the PIW.
Background & Aim:
In an aging society, promoting successful cognitive aging is becoming increasingly important, particularly with regard to age-related cognitive changes and dementia. Therefore, it is critical to support older people, especially those with subjective cognitive decline, through helpful tools and identify effective interventions to alleviate dementia symptoms. While pharmacological treatments have their limitations, such as limited efficacy and side effects, non-pharmacological interventions are becoming increasingly important. The aim of this dissertation was to evaluate non-pharmacological interventions, specifically coping strategies at the beginning of the cognitive spectrum and later non-pharmacological interventions in gen-eral for the treatment of dementia symptoms, in the German healthcare system.
Methods:
First, effective coping strategies were identified by systematically reviewing scientific evidence and then the strategies were included in a memory aid handbook for people with subjective cognitive decline. The memory aid handbook was tested and evaluated in a usability study to determine whether its use had positive effects on people with subjective cognitive decline. Moreover, the implementation of non-pharmacological interventions in German de-mentia care, as well as perceived effects and barriers were examined through focus group discussions with caregivers in general and specifically in interviews with informal caregivers.
Results:
Findings from the systematic review indicated that coping strategies are used across the spectrum of cognitive decline, although the nature of these strategies varied with the severity of impairment. The memory aid handbook, developed based on effective coping strate-gies, has proven to be a useful tool for supporting people with subjective cognitive decline. Participants were able to integrate new strategies and increase their confidence in their already established coping strategies. Further, findings from interviews and expert focus group discussions indicated that other non-pharmacological interventions, particularly social interactions and interventions tailored to the person with dementia, are used to alleviate dementia symptoms and improve the well-being of people with dementia and their caregivers. Despite the perceived positive effects, barriers such as bureaucracy, lack of staff and resources, lack of time, and limited services hindered implementation of non-pharmacological interventions.
Conclusion:
Non-pharmacological interventions are perceived as beneficial by people with subjective cognitive decline and in dementia, although the type of intervention preferred varies. By incorporating a person-centered care approach, non-pharmacological interventions might reach their full potential, although their implementation is hindered by several barriers that need to be addressed in future model projects within the community.
Das Ziel der vorliegenden Dissertation war die Erörterung der Frage „Wie ist die Durchführbarkeit einer telemedizinischen Behandlung von Patienten einer psychiatrischen Institutsambulanz und einer Tagesklinik eines Universitätsklinikums in Deutschland, um die Kontinuität der Versorgung während des ersten COVID-19 Lockdowns zu gewährleisten und wie zufrieden sind die Patienten und Therapeuten?“. Es wurden die Daten einer Beobachtungsstudie während des ersten COVID-19 Lockdowns ausgewertet, in der Patienten in laufender oder neu begonnener ambulanter psychiatrischer Therapie sowie Patienten, die vorzeitig aus der Tagesklinik entlassen werden mussten, telemedizinisch behandelt wurden.
Über die Hälfte der Patienten und Therapeuten gaben an, dass die Besprechung von Problemen und Bedürfnissen über das Telefon genauso gut funktionierte wie in den persönlichen Konsultationen. In der Untergruppe der Patienten, die aufgrund einer vorzeitigen Entlassung aus der Ta-gesklinik neu zur Therapie kamen, war die Akzeptanz sogar noch höher und die Telemedizin wurde in 87,5 % der Kontakte als gleich gut bewertet.
Sowohl Patienten als auch Therapeuten waren der Meinung, dass die telemedizinische Betreu-ung während des Lockdowns eine Alternative zur üblichen Therapie in der Ambulanz darstellt und dass die Möglichkeit der telemedizinischen Betreuung für die Dauer der Coronavirus-Pandemie beibehalten werden sollte.
Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen klaren Trend zur Zufriedenheit mit und Akzeptanz von telemedizinischer Betreuung in einer heterogenen Gruppe von nicht vorselektierten psychiatrischen Patienten. Obwohl die Zahl der Patienten gering ist, deuten die Ergebnisse darauf hin, dass die überwiegend positiven Ergebnisse von telemedizinischen Konzepten in Forschungsprojekten wahrscheinlich auf reale Versorgungssituationen übertragen werden können.
Telemedizin kann, wenn es die Umstände erforderlich machen, wie zum Beispiel in einer Pan-demiesituation, eine effektive Alternative in der psychiatrischen Patientenversorgung bieten, um die kontinuierliche Betreuung zu gewährleisten.
Darüber hinaus stellt die Telemedizin auch außerhalb der Pandemiesituation eine potentielle Erweiterung der Therapie von Patienten in der ambulanten psychiatrischen Versorgung dar.
Vor allem diese hybride Versorgung kann auch auf andere Fachgebiete erweitert werden. Damit könnten nicht nur Engpässe, sondern zum Beispiel auch eine eingeschränkte Mobilität der Pati-enten abgemildert werden.
Background
Paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) patients require chronic care over the lifespan. Care for these patients is complex, as it is adapted for childrens’ life stages and changing disease activity. Guideline based care for this patient group recommends a multidisciplinary approach, which includes in addition to paediatric gastroenterologists, nutritional and psychological care services. For PIBD patients, a discrepancy between available guideline-based multidisciplinary care and actual care has been found from the provider side, but to what extent patients experience this is unclear.
Objectives
To identify which healthcare services were used and whether socio-demographic, geographic or disease related factors have an influence on health service utilisation.
Methods
A standardised questionnaire (CEDNA) was distributed amongst parents of children aged 0–17 diagnosed with PIBD and adolescents (aged 12–17) with a PIBD. Items related to health service use were analysed, these included specialist care, additional care services, reachability of services and satisfaction with care. Logistic regression models on additional service use were calculated. Service availability and reachability maps were made.
Results
Data was analysed for 583 parent and 359 adolescent questionnaires. Over half of the respondents had Crohn’s Disease (CD, patients n = 186 parents n = 297). Most patients and parents reported their paediatric gastroenterologist as their main care contact (patients 90.5%; parents 93%). Frequently reported additional services were nutritional counselling (patients 48.6%; parents 42.2%) and psychological support (patients 28.1%; parents 25.1%). Nutritional counselling was more frequently reported by CD patients in both the patient (OR 2.86; 95%CI 1.73–4.70) and parent (OR 3.1; 95%CI 1.42–6.71) sample. Of the patients, 32% reported not using any additional services, which was more likely for patients with an illness duration of less than one year (OR 3.42; 95%CI 1.26–9.24). This was also observed for the parent population (OR 2.23; 95%CI 1.13–4.4). The population-based density of specialised paediatric gastroenterologists was not proportionate to the spatial distribution of patients in Germany, which may have an influence on access.
Conclusions
Parents and children reported highly specialised medical care. Multidisciplinary care offers do not reach the entire patient population. Access to multidisciplinary services needs to be ensured for all affected children.
Background
Gout is the most common form of rheumatic disease in which monosodium urate crystals are deposited in the joints followed by acute inflammatory reactions. There are various approved drugs that can be prescribed for pain relief during an acute gout attack. However, to date, no direct comparison of efficacy of colchicine and prednisolone for the treatment of acute gout attacks has been investigated. Furthermore, the majority of previous research studies were not only conducted in tertiary centres but also excluded patients with common comorbidities due to contraindications to naproxen.
Methods
This pragmatic, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, non-inferiority trial investigates whether prednisolone (intervention) is non-inferior to treatment with colchicine (active control) in patients with acute gout. Adult patients presenting with acute gout to their general practitioners in 60 practices across 3 university sites (Greifswald, Göttingen, and Würzburg) are eligible to participate in the study. Participants in the intervention group receive 30 mg prednisolone for 5 days. Those in the control group receive low-dose colchicine (day 1: 1.5 mg; days 2–5: 1 mg). The primary outcome is the absolute level of the most severe pain on day 3 (in the last 24 h) measured with an 11-item numerical rating scale. Day 0 is the day patients take their study medication for the first time. They are then asked to fill out a study diary the same time each day for pain quantification. Pain scores are used for comparison between the two medications. Secondary outcomes are average response to treatment, swelling, tenderness and physical function of the joint, patients’ global assessment of treatment success, use of additional pain medication and non-pharmacological pain therapies. For safety reasons, potential side effects and course of systolic blood pressure are assessed.
Discussion
This trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of pain reduction and side effects of colchicine and prednisolone in acute gout in primary care.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05698680 first posted on January 26, 2023 (retrospectively registered). URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05698680
Mortality is predicted by the sum of behavior-related health risk factors (BRFs: tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, body overweight, and physical inactivity). We analyzed degrees and combinations of BRFs in their relation to mortality and adjusted for mental disorders. In a random sample of the general population in northern Germany aged 18–64, BRFs and mental disorders had been assessed in 1996–1997 by the Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview. A sum score including eight ranks of the behavior-related health risk factors was built. Death and its causes were ascertained 2017–2018 using residents’ registration files and death certificates. Relations of the sum score and combinations of the BRFs at baseline with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality 20 years later were analyzed. The sum score and combinations predicted all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. The odds ratio of the sum score was 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.31–1.46) after adjustment for age, gender, and mental disorder. In addition to the BRFs, mood, anxiety or somatoform disorders were not related to mortality. We concluded that the sum score and combinations of behavior-related health risk factors predicted mortality, even after adjustment for mental disorders.
Affective disorders are a common psychological impairment. A major problem with respect to treatment is medication non-adherence. eHealth interventions are already widely used in the treatment of patients living with affective disorders. The aim of this systematic literature review is to obtain the current scientific evidence to eHealth as a tool to improve medication adherence in patients with affective disorders. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and PsycInfo. Studies in English and German published between 2007 and 2020 were included. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines and were performed with the CADIMA online tool. A total of 17 articles were included in this review. Eleven studies were randomized controlled trials, two were controlled clinical trials, and four had a pre-/post-design. Three different types of interventions could be identified: internet-based self-management programs (n=4), multi-faceted interventions addressing different dimensions of medication adherence (n=4), and single-faceted interventions (n=9) comprising four mobile interventions and five telehealth interventions. Eleven interventions addressed patients with (comorbid) depressions and six addressed patients with bipolar disorders. Six interventions showed a statistically significant positive effect on medication adherence. None of the studies showed a statistically significant negative effect. All interventions which had a statistically significant positive effect on medication adherence involved personal contacts between therapists and patients. All included eHealth interventions are at least as effective as control conditions and seems to be effective for patients with depression as well as with bipolar disorders. Personal contacts seem to improve the effectiveness of eHealth interventions. eHealth interventions are an effective way to improve medication adherence in patients with affective disorders. In rural or underserved regions, eHealth can supplement usual care interventions on medication adherence by expanding access. More analyses are needed in order to understand determinants for the effectiveness of eHealth interventions on medication adherence enhancement.
Background
Clinical trials are the gold standard for advancing medical knowledge and improving patient outcomes. For their success, an appropriately sized cohort is required. However, patient recruitment remains one of the most challenging aspects of clinical trials. Information technology (IT) support systems—for instance, patient recruitment systems—may help overcome existing challenges and improve recruitment rates, when customized to the user needs and environment.
Objective
The goal of our study is to describe the status quo of patient recruitment processes and to identify user requirements for the development of a patient recruitment system.
Methods
We conducted a web-based survey with 56 participants as well as semistructured interviews with 33 participants from 10 German university hospitals.
Results
We here report the recruitment procedures and challenges of 10 university hospitals. The recruitment process was influenced by diverse factors such as the ward, use of software, and the study inclusion criteria. Overall, clinical staff seemed more involved in patient identification, while the research staff focused on screening tasks. Ad hoc and planned screenings were common. Identifying eligible patients was still associated with significant manual efforts. The recruitment staff used Microsoft Office suite because tailored software were not available. To implement such software, data from disparate sources will need to be made available. We discussed concrete technical challenges concerning patient recruitment systems, including requirements for features, data, infrastructure, and workflow integration, and we contributed to the support of developing a successful system.
Conclusions
Identifying eligible patients is still associated with significant manual efforts. To fully make use of the high potential of IT in patient recruitment, many technical and process challenges have to be solved first. We contribute and discuss concrete technical challenges for patient recruitment systems, including requirements for features, data, infrastructure, and workflow integration.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising field in cardiovascular disease (CVD) research, offering innovative approaches to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes. In this study, we conducted bibliometric analysis combined with topic modeling to provide a comprehensive overview of the AI research landscape in CVD. Our analysis included 23,846 studies from Web of Science and PubMed, capturing the latest advancements and trends in this rapidly evolving field. By employing LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) we identified key research themes, trends, and collaborations within the AI-CVD domain.
The findings revealed the exponential growth of AI-related research in CVD, underscoring its immense potential to revolutionize cardiovascular healthcare. The annual scientific publication of machine learning papers in CVD increases continuously and significantly since 2016, with an overall annual growth rate of 22.8%. Almost half (46.2%) of the growth happened in the last 5 years. USA, China, India, UK and Korea were the top five productive countries in number of publications. UK, Germany and Australia were the most collaborative countries with a multiple country publication (MCP) value of 42.8%, 40.3% and 40.0% respectively. We observed the emergence of twenty-two distinct research topics, including “stroke and robotic rehabilitation therapy,” “robotic-assisted cardiac surgery,” and “cardiac image analysis,” which persisted as major topics throughout the years. Other topics, such as “retinal image analysis and CVD” and “biomarker and wearable signal analyses,” have recently emerged as dominant areas of research in cardiovascular medicine.
Convolutional neural network appears to be the most mentioned algorithm followed by LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) and KNN (K-Nearest Neighbours). This indicates that the future direction of AI cardiovascular research is predominantly directing toward neural networks and image analysis.
As AI continues to shape the landscape of CVD research, our study serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, providing valuable insights into the current state of AI in CVD research. This study offers a deep understanding of research trends and paves the way for future directions to maximiz the potential of AI to effectively combat cardiovascular diseases.