Doctoral Thesis
Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3) (remove)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- conservation (3) (remove)
Species persistence in the face of rapidly progressing environmental change requires adaptive responses that allow organisms to either cope with the novel conditions in their habitat or to follow their environmental niche in space. A poleward range shift due to global warming induced habitat loss in the south has been predicted for the lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros. Theoretical as well as numerous empirical studies link range expansion success to increased dispersal and reproduction rates due to spatial sorting and r-selection resulting from low population densities at the expansion front. R. hipposideros females however are highly philopatric and the species’ life history reflects a K- rather than an r-strategy, encompassing a long life span and limited individual annual reproductive output. I therefore investigated if adaptations in these traits determining range expansion success (dispersal and reproduction) can be observed in this bat species of high conservation concern. Genetic diversity presents a critical factor for adaptive responses to global change, both for range expansion and for coping with novel environmental conditions. I hence explored the genetic diversity levels of European R. hipposideros leading edge populations and their drivers for an assessment of these populations’ evolutionary potential and the development of conservation recommendations.
Comparing range expansion traits between an expanding R. hipposideros metapopulation in Germany and a non-expanding one in France revealed that range expansion was associated with an increase in juvenile survival and fecundity, and no decrease in adult survival. These results demonstrate than an increase in reproduction and growth rates is generally possible in R. hipposideros, indicating a potential adaptation (sensu lato) to range expansion. A positive correlation between adult and juvenile survival in the expanding metapopulation suggests higher resource acquisition in the expanding metapopulation, giving rise to the question if the observed demographic changes have a genetic basis or if they are rather induced by differences in environmental conditions between the two metapopulations. Long-term range expansion success requires adaptive evolutionary changes. The relative contribution of the former and that of undirected changes resulting e.g. from differences in resource availability therefore will have to be investigated in more detail in the future to allow predictions about range expansion dynamics in R. hipposideros.
The number of individuals within a radius of approximately 60 to 90 km around a population (as a measure of connectivity) was identified as the main positive driver of the studied populations’ genetic diversity. Overall genetic diversity levels in German R. hipposideros populations were found to be reduced compared to populations in France as a legacy of demographic bottlenecks resulting from severe population declines in the mid-20th century. This finding is alarming as future range expansion can be expected to entail a further decrease in genetic diversity. The resulting loss of genetic diversity can be expected to be particularly strong in R. hipposideros due to the detected dependence of genetic diversity on connectivity, because range expansion often results in small and patchy populations.
Protecting and ideally re-installing genetic diversity in R. hipposideros leading edge populations therefore presents a conservation goal of utmost importance. To achieve this endeavour, conservation efforts should target the protection of extensive networks of well-connected populations. Geographical concentration of individuals should be avoided and populations in key locations that connect clusters must be protected particularly well to prevent populations from becoming isolated. Continuous, regular monitoring of population trends is also important for a quick registration of disturbances or threats, and the subsequent rapid development of countermeasures to preclude further demographic declines.
The reduced levels of genetic diversity in the German metapopulation precluded a reliable quantification of dispersal rates due to the reduced power of discrimination between individuals. While ongoing re-colonization and the establishment of new maternity colonies provide evidence for increased dispersal in the expanding metapopulation, evaluating the expected range expansion velocity of R. hipposideros in relation to the estimated velocity of global warming induced habitat loss will require the confirmation of the existing preliminary dispersal data by employing more genetic markers.
Many ethicists consider the rule of nonmaleficence – Do no harm! – to be the most fundamental ethical rule and key to ethics. This rule is taken as the foundation of the present work. I argue that any entity, that can be harmed, ought to be morally considered. Only those entities can be harmed that are inherently goal-directed or striving – in other words, that possess a telos. The reason is that by constantly acting in ways to preserve their being and to prevent their own not-being, goal-directed entities express that they value their own good. To harm such a goal-directed entity therefore means to act against the values and the good of it. The argument so far supports ethical biocentrism, that is, the view that all living, goal-directed beings are harmable, possess interests, and are, thus, morally considerable, while non-living beings are not. Yet, I digress from classical biocentrism since I conclude, based on analysis of evolutionary and biological findings, that the locus of goal-directedness and potential harm is also, if not foremost, situated in genes. Within many species, individual organisms sacrifice themselves for the betterment of their descendants like in praying mantises where males sacrifice themselves and are eaten by the female during copulation. This shows that it is not necessarily the organism as an individual which follows its own interests and goals. Individual organisms are – to a high degree – “directed” by their genes. Even in highly developed animals, genes play a significant role in the goal-directedness of the individuals. An adult human organism, for example, consists of trillions of individual cells. However, all these cells are derived from a single cell – the fertilized egg. Each of our lives begins with a single cell that contains almost all information to finally form our functioning body. Where do all the instructions, the goal-directedness come from to finally form an adult organism if not from the genes contained in this first cell, the zygote? It is the genes of each zygote that contain a set of information for making the appropriate adult. Organisms are largely programmed to do everything necessary to stay in existence, to survive, and finally to pass on their genes successfully – either by reproducing or by helping close relatives that carry a similar set of genes. The main interests of genes lie in their continued existence. This necessitates reproduction since the gene-carrying organisms will inevitably die. Single genes, though, are difficult to morally consider directly since they perform entirely in and through individual organisms. Without the individual organisms, genes cannot survive. The good news for ethics is that the interests of genes and organism usually converge: individual organisms try to survive – as do their genes. In practice, it thus makes much more sense to give moral attention to entire organisms instead of single genes. An advantage of the gene-centric ethical theory proposed here is that the moral relevance of future generations and species can be “directly” justified: Since genes have an interest in their continued existence (in the form of identical copies), they would be harmed if future generations were doomed to inexistence. Within a species with many individuals, each gene is likely to be represented in many organisms. The smaller the gene pool of a species gets, the less likely is the existence of the same gene and, therefore, the less likely is the fulfillment of its fundamental interests. Hence, saving one of the last individuals of an endangered species would be ethically preferable to saving an individual of a populous species. Unfortunately, moral conflicts are abundant – not only concerning biodiversity conservation. We often have to choose between harming either entity A or entity B – for example in the daily questions of food and eating. In such cases, a strictly egalitarian theory (especially an egalitarian biocentric one) would be no real help and without any guiding power. Therefore, on a second level of morality, we have to include additional criteria that help to minimize the overall harm. For these criteria to be objective, universalizable, and thus moral ones, I apply a number of widely accepted ethical principles like the principle of proportionality, impartiality, self-defense, and universalizability. By recurring to these principles, I identify a set of morally relevant criteria for a fair resolution of moral conflict situations which help to minimize the overall harm done. The identified criteria are: (phylogenetic) nearness, endangerment, r- or K-selected species, evolutionary distinctiveness, ability to regrow and to regenerate, pain-susceptibility, and ecosystematic role. In sum, my gene-centric environmental ethical theory provides numerous reasons and arguments for biodiversity conservation – for protecting genes, organisms, species, and ecosystems alike – without neglecting the needs of humans.
Mind the gap: Information gaps and bridging options in assessing in-situ conservation achievements
(2008)
The biodiversity crisis has gained political attention on a global level. The “2010 Target” of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims to significantly reduce the loss of biodiversity by 2010. In order to achieve this, a network of representative and effectively managed protected areas is to be established. The effectiveness of protected areas thus represents one indicator for progress towards the CBD’s 2010 Target. However, indicators require information. The present study, in a first step, reviews the availability of open access long-term ecological data for assessing protected area effectiveness. This review shows two parallel – though contradictory – phenomena: data overkill and data scarcity. While the number of online databases providing open access data on biodiversity has grown tremendously, no long-term ecological data for a larger set of protected areas can be openly accessed. Reasons for this data scarcity are discussed. Based on this lack of information, in a second step, a method to bridge information gaps through social science research is aspired. An innovative Conservation Success Framework is developed, which defines and relates conservation needs, conservation capacity and conservation actions, its three main components. The basic assumption is that conservation can only be successful where the conservation capacity exists that is required to implement the conservation actions determined by the conservation needs. The framework was used to develop open and closed questionnaires for application in two Mexican biosphere reserves, the Sierra Gorda and the Sierra de Manantlán. As "conservation success" is often immeasurable in protected areas in practice due to unspecific conservation objectives the term is for the case studies substituted by “conservation achievements”, i.e. clearly noticeable effects from conservation actions. Overall, almost 60 interviews were conducted with different stakeholder groups. The gained information is validated through social science research techniques, such as triangulation of perspectives and active and passive observation. Based on this, conservation needs are identified and conservation capacities summarised and discussed for both case study sites. Implemented conservation actions addressing identified conservation needs and conservation capacity constraints are then analysed. In addition, noticeable effects from conservation actions on the state of biodiversity at case study sites, i.e. the conservation achievements, are described. Where locally available, non-open access data (as opposing open access data) are used to verify the findings from the social science research. Identified conservation achievements at both case study sites are evident both from quantitative information (for example forest cover increase according to non-open access data) and qualitative information (for example perceived change in the occurrence of illegal activities according to interviews). In addition, rather “intangible” indicators that can only be revealed through qualitative surveys are identified for both sites. This study thus highlights the crucial importance of integrating different types of data, ecological and socio-economic, as well as quantitative and qualitative ones. The present study concludes with a series of recommendations 1) to local practitioners at the two case study sites, and 2) to the international conservation community. Local practitioners may benefit from the present study because its results provide for each site a) an overview of existing conservation needs and implemented conservation actions; b) an easy way to identify action gaps; c) a baseline to identify progress indicators; and d) an overview of diverse perspectives on the current effectiveness of the biosphere reserves. These benefits are considered of particular importance as they can be influential in the revision of the site’s management plans, which both are now approximately ten years old and will soon be revised. The international conservation community will not be able to make a clear statement in the year 2010 about the effectiveness of protected areas on a global level due to a lack of information and transparency. However, the year 2010 should not be considered an end point for measuring progress in in-situ conservation; instead protected area quality standards must be created, effectiveness evaluations institutionalised and efforts to foster regular reporting must continue. Consequently, a scheme of consolidated actions from local to national and international level is proposed that could help to sustainably bridge existing information gaps and close them on the long run. In the end, progress reporting on the effectiveness of protected areas, and other indicators, can only improve if different governance levels “mind the information gaps” in cooperation, until continued information gathering and sharing hopefully closes these gaps one day.