Doctoral Thesis
Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Afrikanische Schweinepest (3) (remove)
Institute
Das Afrikanische Schweinepestvirus (ASPV) ist ein wirtschaftlich wichtiger und in Haus- und Wildschweinen Hämorrhagie mit hoher Sterblichkeitsrate verursachender viraler Erreger.
1921 erstmals in Kenia beschrieben, breitete sich die ASP seit 2007 auch über den
Kaukasus, ins Baltikum (2014), weiter in europäische und asiatische Länder und seit 2020 in Deutschland aus. Trotz der hohen genetischen Stabilität des Afrikanischen
Schweinepestvirus (ASPV) wurden Genomvarianten identifiziert, bei denen Unterschiede
in der Genexpression von Multigenfamilien (MGF) dominieren. Letztlich divergieren ASPV-Stämme in ihrer Virulenz und verursachen akut-letale bis chronische Verläufe im Schwein. Aufgrund der enormen Komplexität des Virus und seiner vielfältigen
Immunevasionsstrategien sind viele Mechanismen der Virus-Wirts-Interaktion, die zur
Immunpathogenese beitragen, nicht ausreichend verstanden und erschweren somit die
Impfstoffentwicklung. Dabei können virale Subversionsmechanismen der Wirtszelle die
antivirale Immunantwort modulieren und stehen deshalb im Fokus dieser Arbeit. Zur
Charakterisierung und mechanistischen Aufklärung dieser ASPV-spezifischen
Immunsubversionsmechanismen wurden primäre porzine Monozyten von Hausschweinen
mit hochvirulentem (Armenia) und natürlich-attenuiertem (Estonia) ASPV infiziert. Die
Resultate ergaben sowohl stammunabhängige als auch -abhängige Unterschiede in der
Regulation myeloider Oberflächenmarker infizierter Monozyten. Insbesondere
beobachteten wir eine stammunabhängige Suppression des Phagozytose-regulierenden
CD172a und eine stammabhängige Regulation von porzinem MHC I (SLA I). Weitere
Experimente zur Untersuchung der zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen ergaben, dass zwar
beide Stämme die Oberflächenexpression von CD172 unterdrücken, jedoch nur Armenia-,
im Gegensatz zu Estonia-infizierten Monozyten, eine reduzierte Recyclingrate sowie eine Abspaltung (Shedding) von CD172a von der Zelloberfläche zeigten. Dies lässt vermuten, dass die Virus-vermittelte Suppression von CD172a der beiden ASPV-Stämme auf unterschiedlichen Subversionsmechanismen beruht. Reinfektionsexperimente und
molekularbiologische Untersuchungen belegten zudem, dass das abgespaltene
Oberflächen-CD172a der Armenia-infizierten Monozyten mit einer gesteigerten
Infektionsrate einhergeht, dies ist wahrscheinlich das Ergebnis (entweder direkt oder indirekt) einer Komplexbildung zwischen dem virulenten Armenia-Virus und löslichem
CD172a. Im Gegensatz dazu resultierte die Infektion von Monozyten mit Armenia, jedoch nicht mit Estonia, in einem deutlichen Oberflächenverlust von porzinem SLA I, welches für die Antigenpräsentation gegenüber CD8+ T-Zellen essentiell ist. Weitere Versuche zeigten einen Reifungsdefekt von SLA I, der mit dem Abbau funktioneller ER-Strukturen und der Induktion von ER-Stress in Armenia-infizierten Monozyten in Zusammenhang stand. Gleichzeitig wurde eine deutlich reduzierte Überlebensfähigkeit Armenia-infizierter Monozyten beobachtet, die mit einem Verlust mitochondrialer Funktionen und der Bildung von Aggresomen aus fehlgefalteten Proteinen im Zytoplasma einherging. Vertiefende Analysen dazu zeigten einen Caspase-3 aktivierten Zelltodmechanismus und ein infektionsbedingtes, progressives Abschalten der Proteintranslation in Armenia-infizierten Zellen. Um einen möglichen Zusammenhang zwischen den beobachteten
Subversionsmechanismen und der Expression bestimmter viraler MGF-Gene zu finden,
wurden weitere ASPV-Stämme in die Untersuchungen zur CD172a- und SLA I-Oberflächenexpression einbezogen. Ähnlich wie Armenia zeigte sich auch für die Stämme
NHV und OURT88/3 eine deutliche Reduktion der SLA I-Oberflächenlevel, auch wenn diese
in vivo gering-virulent sind. Andererseits zeigte das hochvirulente Benin97/1-Isolat im Gegensatz zu Armenia keine SLA I-Subversion, sondern ähnlich wie nach Estonia-Infektion kaum veränderte SLA I-Level, was vermuten lässt, dass der SLA I Subversionsmechanismus nicht alleinig den Virulenzgrad der ASPV-Stämme bestimmt. Ein direkter Genomvergleich identifizierte verschiedene Mitglieder der MGF110- und MGF505-Gene als möglicherweise beteiligte virale Genkandidaten. Im Gegensatz hierzu ergaben sich keine detektierbaren Unterschiede bei den Analysen zur Oberflächensuppression von CD172a innerhalb der verwendeten Isolate, wie bereits bei Armenia und Estonia Infektion beobachtet. Interessanterweise beobachteten wir dabei das Vorhandensein von MGF110-14 als eine genomische Gemeinsamkeit, die für die generelle Oberflächenreduktion von CD172a, zusätzlich zu anderen Genen, die ein Shedding und die Armenia-spezifische Interaktion bestimmen könnten, verantwortlich sein könnte.
Insgesamt zeigen die Resultate dieser Arbeit erstmals, dass das virulente ASPV Armenia, anders als das attenuierte ASPV Estonia, einen ausgeprägten Funktions- und Vitalitätsverlust in seinen primären Zielzellen (z. B. Monozyten) bewirkt. Die gesteigerte Infektiosität, Induktion von zellulärem Stress und Beeinträchtigung der SLA I-vermittelten Antigenpräsentation werden in infizierten Schweinen eine entscheidende Rolle in der Virus-Verbreitung und der Immunevasion spielen. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass die Befunde dieser Arbeit neue und vertiefte Einblicke in die zellulären Mechanismen der SLA I- und CD172a-Subversion im Zusammenhang mit der Immunevasion durch hoch-virulentes ASPV Armenia und attenuiertes ASPV Estonia gibt und zudem wichtig für das bessere Verständnis der ASP-Immunpathogenese sind.
Mass spectrometry-based Proteome analysis of porcine cells infected with African swine fever virus
(2023)
ASFV, a highly contagious, pathogenic and lethal pathogen of swine, poses a major threat to domestic and wild suids worldwide as neither vaccines nor treatments are available. Compared to other well-characterized similarly complex viruses like herpesviruses or adenoviruses, the understanding of ASFV biology is poor.
To improve the understanding of ASFV biology, following the establishment of a robust protocol for the isolation of primary monocyte-derived porcine macrophages (moMΦ) and their infection with ASFV for mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteome analysis was performed.
Under both conditions, naïve and infected, the isolated cells showed cell type-specific characteristics like phagocytosis and antigen presentation and protein expression patterns, including the expression of swine leucocyte antigens and CD markers. Furthermore, moMΦ could be reproducibly infected with ASFV isolates of different genotypes and pathogenicity.
The ASFV protein expression patterns in moMΦ correlate well with those observed in established cell lines at transcript and protein level. The expression of 27 ASFV proteins was confirmed at the protein level. Among them, 9 members of multi-gene families (MGF) and 12 novel open reading frames (nORFs) were recently predicted based on transcription start site mapping.
The direct comparison of closely related ASFV genotype II isolates revealed no virulence-associated protein expression patterns beyond those expected based on the genome sequences of the isolates.
Using different MS quantification strategies, it was shown that ASFV affects both static protein expression levels and protein synthesis. These changes in protein expression impact proteins and pathways known to be targeted by ASFV, including CD-markers, ER-stress and cell death pathways, and cellular antiviral responses. Beyond these observations that further validated the moMΦ infection model, novel effects of the ASFV infection on the cellular proteome were noticed.
These effects include the decreased expression levels of cathepsins, especially cathepsins D (CTSD), H (CTSH) and L (CTSL) as well as the transient activation of MAPK14/p38 prior to its strong downregulation. In addition to MAPK14/p38 further members of the MAPK14/p38 signaling pathway, like MAPKAPK2, were affected by ASFV infection.
As these modulations of the cellular proteome would in general result in decreased pro-inflammatory responses, it did stand out that the synthesis of interferon-response related genes including MX1 and ISG15 evaded the ASFV-induced global reduction of protein synthesis. In contrast, the synthesis of genes involved in RNA processing and splicing was significantly impaired. In total, the regulations of individual host proteins assessed in the context of the whole cellular proteome integrate well with each other and other cellular responses to ASFV infection and may help to improve the understanding of host-virus interactions.
Overall, this thesis provides novel insights into the expression of ASFV-encoded ORFs of different isolates and the host response to ASFV infection. It points out that the current knowledge of the ASFV coding capacity, temporal protein expression patterns, protein functionality, post-translational modifications and host interactions is still sketchy as many aspects of ASFV replication have yet to be understood. The established moMΦ-model to study ASFV infections in vitro provides a powerful tool for future applications to increase the understanding of ASFV biology.
Viral diseases are a threat to bacteria and enormous animals alike. Vaccines are available against several viruses. However, for some viruses, like ASFV, we still lack vaccines, while for others, like IAV, they are not as effective as we need them to be. To a large extent, this is because we do not fully understand the mechanisms conferring antiviral immunity. To improve our understanding of antiviral immunity, we used a model species that is in many immunological aspects closer to humans than the widely used laboratory mice, pigs. In this thesis, pigs were investigated as a potential biomedical model species for viral respiratory infections in humans and as a natural host for viral infections. Both approaches provide valuable insights into aspects of porcine immunology that can either be used as the foundation for translational research or for the design of targeted therapeutics and vaccines for pigs.
Insights into fundamental characteristics of the porcine immune system form the basis for translational studies. Paper I pioneered a detailed characterization of porcine iNKT cells. To make pigs and porcine iNKT cells more available for scientific investigations, we established multicolor flow cytometry analysis platforms that allow for a more detailed investigation of these cells than previously possible. We found porcine iNKT cells circulating in peripheral blood to be a rare population among CD3+ lymphocytes that displays a pre-activated effector state and can be divided into at least three functional subsets. Upon antigenic activation, they proliferated rapidly, secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines, and exerted cytotoxicity. Moreover, we provided first evidence for a role of iNKT cells in porcine IAV and ASFV infections, which we investigated in more detail in paper IV. Central characteristics, i.e., phenotype and functional properties, exhibit a high degree of similarity between humans and pigs. Moreover, differences between human and murine iNKT cells are more pronounced than between humans and pigs.
Based on the results obtained in paper II, the established biomedical model could be used for further studies of infectious respiratory diseases. IAV infections pave the way for secondary co-infections with increased morbidity and lethality. These bactoviral co-infections are a threat to both pigs and humans. The shared susceptibility as well as homologies on the physiological and immunological level make pigs exceptionally suitable animal models for studies of these infections. Paper I and II can also be interpreted under translational aspects. Activation of iNKT cells in porcine vaccination studies showed promising results. Based on these and our findings, this might be a suitable approach for humans as well. Along with other studies, our results suggest that pigs might be a well-suited large animal model for research in infectious diseases. This is true especially for respiratory infections, such as seasonal IAV infections, for which pigs are natural hosts and contribute to viral spread and emergence as “mixing vessels”, which can result in pandemic strains like H1N1pdm09. We could show that porcine iNKT cells as well as the antiviral responses of cTC against H1N1pdm09 in pigs are comparable to human cells and processes. The increased implementation of pigs in basic and applied research might enable an improved translation of scientific knowledge to human and veterinary medicine.
In two further studies, papers III and IV, we investigated T-cell responses during a viral infection, ASF, for which pigs are the only natural hosts. Immune responses were similar after highly and moderately virulent ASFV infection in domestic pigs and wild boar, respectively. However, they differed between both species. Antiviral immunity in domestic pigs was predominantly exerted by αβ T cells, CD8α+ and DP αβ T cells, while the response in wild boar was dominated by γδ T cells, mainly CD8α+ effector cells. Since wild boar show a higher disease severity and lethality, even during infection with moderately virulent ASFV “Estonia2014”, a shift to γδ T cells seems to be detrimental. In contrast, domestic pigs survive infections with moderately virulent ASFV “Estonia2014”, which indicates that CD8α+ or DP αβ T cells confer protection at least in infections with non-highly virulent ASFV strains. Interestingly, in paper V we found higher and prolonged inflammation in domestic pigs, correlating with increased T-cell influx. However, histopathological analyses revealed no direct explanation for the differences in disease progression and lethality in domestic pigs and wild boar. These findings require further studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
The lack of basic data about immunological differences between domestic pigs and wild boar hampers attempts to understand immunity against ASFV. We found differences between both suid subspecies already at steady state and even more prominent during ASFV infections in papers III-V. Most apparently, T-cell responses in wild boar were heavily biased towards γδ T cells, while immune responses in domestic pigs were based on αβ T cells. However, information about even basic characteristics, like the composition, phenotypes, and functional qualities of wild boar’s immune system, is missing. Therefore, essential baseline data must be obtained in order to adequately assess changes in future studies.
Analyses like these reveal major advantages of pigs as a biomedical model. On the one hand, similar to conventional model species, researchers can investigate every tissue at any desired time. Tissue from human patients is often scarce or not at all available, so models that can be investigated at specific times after infection are needed. On the other hand, results obtained in pigs are more comparable to humans than data from murine studies. Moreover, pigs are susceptible to similar pathogens as humans and experimental infections can be investigated without the need for major genetic manipulations. However, there are also limitations of the porcine model system. Analysis tools are not as advanced as they are for mice, especially in terms of availability of mAbs or genetically modified organisms. Still, given the major advantages that become more and more obvious, efforts should be made to make pigs more applicable for basic and translational research. In addition, findings derived from pigs can be used for the species itself. Pigs are a major livestock species and new treatments, or vaccines could also be used for them. Therefore, this research could eventually also improve animal welfare.
In summary, the presented thesis significantly enhanced our knowledge of porcine immune processes for cTC in general and iNKT cells in particular. Results were obtained both at steady state and in the context of IAV and ASFV infections, and thus, made pigs more available as a model for future research. The use of multicolor flow cytometry provided a broad overview of the ongoing immune reactions and enables further, more wide-ranging studies that can also address open questions in even more complex infection scenarios.