Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- apoptosis (2) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
- MDPI (2)
Background: The use of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) in oncology has been intensively investigated over the past 15 years as it inhibits the growth of many tumor cells. It is known that reactive oxidative species (ROS) produced in CAP are responsible for this effect. However, to translate the use of CAP into medical practice, it is essential to know how CAP treatment affects non-malignant cells. Thus, the current in vitro study deals with the effect of CAP on human bone cancer cells and human osteoblasts. Here, identical CAP treatment regimens were applied to the malignant and non-malignant bone cells and their impact was compared. Methods: Two different human bone cancer cell types, U2-OS (osteosarcoma) and A673 (Ewing’s sarcoma), and non-malignant primary osteoblasts (HOB) were used. The CAP treatment was performed with the clinically approved kINPen MED. After CAP treatment, growth kinetics and a viability assay were performed. For detecting apoptosis, a caspase-3/7 assay and a TUNEL assay were used. Accumulated ROS was measured in cell culture medium and intracellular. To investigate the influence of CAP on cell motility, a scratch assay was carried out. Results: The CAP treatment showed strong inhibition of cell growth and viability in bone cancer cells. Apoptotic processes were enhanced in the malignant cells. Osteoblasts showed a higher potential for ROS resistance in comparison to malignant cells. There was no difference in cell motility between benign and malignant cells following CAP treatment. Conclusions: Osteoblasts show better tolerance to CAP treatment, indicated by less affected viability compared to CAP-treated bone cancer cells. This points toward the selective effect of CAP on sarcoma cells and represents a further step toward the clinical application of CAP.
Background: Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is increasingly used in the field of oncology.
Many of the mechanisms of action of CAP, such as inhibiting proliferation, DNA breakage, or the
destruction of cell membrane integrity, have been investigated in many different types of tumors.
In this regard, data are available from both in vivo and in vitro studies. Not only the direct treatment
of a tumor but also the influence on its blood supply play a decisive role in the success of the therapy
and the patient’s further prognosis. Whether the CAP influences this process is unknown, and the
first indications in this regard are addressed in this study. Methods: Two different devices, kINPen
and MiniJet, were used as CAP sources. Human endothelial cell line HDMEC were treated directly
and indirectly with CAP, and growth kinetics were performed. To indicate apoptotic processes,
caspase-3/7 assay and TUNEL assay were used. The influence of CAP on cellular metabolism
was examined using the MTT and glucose assay. After CAP exposure, tube formation assay was
performed to examine the capillary tube formation abilities of HDMEC and their migration was
messured in separate assays. To investigate in a possible mutagenic effect of CAP treatment,
a hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyl-transferase assay with non malignant cell (CCL-93) line was
performed. Results: The direct CAP treatment of the HDMEC showed a robust growth-inhibiting
effect, but the indirect one did not. The MMT assay showed an apparent reduction in cell metabolism
in the first 24 h after CAP treatment, which appeared to normalize 48 h and 72 h after CAP application.
These results were also confirmed by the glucose assay. The caspase 3/7 assay and TUNEL assay
showed a significant increase in apoptotic processes in the HDMEC after CAP treatment. These results
were independent of the CAP device. Both the migration and tube formation of HDMEC were
significant inhibited after CAP-treatment. No malignant effects could be demonstrated by the CAP
treatment on a non-malignant cell line.