Refine
Document Type
- Article (14)
Language
- English (14)
Has Fulltext
- yes (14)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (14)
Keywords
- - (12)
- plasma medicine (3)
- reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (3)
- RNS (2)
- ROS (2)
- antibiotics (2)
- antiseptic stewardship (2)
- biocide (2)
- cross-resistance (2)
- cross-tolerance (2)
Institute
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin (14) (remove)
Publisher
- MDPI (14) (remove)
Oral mucositis is the most common and severe non-hematological complication associated with cancer radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or their combination. Treatment of oral mucositis focuses on pain management and the use of natural anti-inflammatory, sometimes weakly antiseptic mouth rinses in combination with optimal oral cavity hygiene. To prevent negative effects of rinsing, accurate testing of oral care products is necessary. Due to their ability to mimic realistic in-vivo conditions, 3D models may be an appropriate option in compatibility testing of anti-inflammatory and antiseptically effective mouth rinses. We present a 3D model of oral mucosa based on the cell line TR-146 with a physical barrier, characterized by high transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and confirmed cell integrity. Histological characterization of the 3D mucosa model showed a stratified, non-keratinized multilayer of epithelial cells similar to that of human oral mucosa. By means of immuno-staining, tissue-specific expression of cytokeratin 13 and 14 was shown. Incubation of the 3D mucosa model with the rinses had no effects on cell viability, but TEER decreased 24h after incubation in all solutions except ProntOral®. Analogous to skin models, the established 3D model meets the quality control criteria of OECD guidelines and may therefore be suitable for comparing the cytocompatibility of oral rinses.
Unlike the native surface of the implant material (Ti6Al4V), oxidation with H2O2 leads to increased binding of the effective antimicrobial agent poly(hexamethylene) biguanide [PHMB]. However, treating with NaOH instead results in an even higher PHMB mass coverage. After oxidation with H2O2, strong differences in the PHMB adsorption capability between polished and corundum-blasted surfaces appear, indicating a roughness dependence. After NaOH treatment, no such effect was observed. The wetting properties of specimens treated with either H2O2 or NaOH prior to PHMB exposure clearly varied. To unravel the nature of this interaction, widespread in silico and in vitro experiments were performed. Methods: By X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, water contact angle measurements and MD simulations, we characterized the interplay between the polycationic antimicrobial agent and the implant surface. A theoretical model for PHMB micelles is tested for its wetting properties and compared to carbon contaminated TiO2. In addition, quantitation of anionic functional group equivalents, the binding properties of PHMB with blocked amino end-group, and the ability to bind chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) were investigated. Ultimately, the capability of osteoblasts to build calcium apatite, and the activity of alkaline phosphatase on PHMB coated specimens, were determined. Results: Simulated water contact angles on carbon contaminated TiO2 surfaces and PHMB micelle models reveal little influence of PHMB on the wetting properties and point out the major influence of remaining and recovering contamination from ambient air. Testing PHMB adsorption beyond the critical micelle concentration and subsequent staining reveals an island-like pattern with H2O2 as compared to an evenly modified surface with NaOH. Both CHG and PHMB, with blocked amino end groups, were adsorbed on the treated surfaces, thus negating the significant influence of PHMB’s terminal groups. The ability of osteoblasts to produce calcium apatite and alkaline phosphatase is not negatively impaired for PHMB mass coverages up to 8 μg/specimen. Conclusion: Differences in PHMB adsorption are triggered by the number of anionic groups and carbon contaminants, both of which depend on the specimen pre-treatment. With more PHMB covering, the implant surface is protected against the capture of new contamination from the ambient air, thus building a robust antimicrobial and biocompatible surface coating.
Multiple evidence in animal models and in humans suggest a beneficial role of cold physical
plasma in wound treatment. Yet, risk assessment studies are important to further foster therapeutic
advancement and acceptance of cold plasma in clinics. Accordingly, we investigated the long-term
side effects of repetitive plasma treatment over 14 consecutive days in a rodent full-thickness ear
wound model. Subsequently, animals were housed for 350 days and sacrificed thereafter. In blood,
systemic changes of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin 1β and tumor necrosis factor α
were absent. Similarly, tumor marker levels of α-fetoprotein and calcitonin remained unchanged.
Using quantitative PCR, the expression levels of several cytokines and tumor markers in liver,
lung, and skin were found to be similar in the control and treatment group as well. Likewise,
histological and immunohistochemical analysis failed to detect abnormal morphological changes
and the presence of tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen, α-fetoprotein, or the neighbor
of Punc 11. Absence of neoplastic lesions was confirmed by non-invasive imaging methods such as
anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of cold plasma in wound healing come without apparent
side effects including tumor formation or chronic inflammation.
Contaminated surfaces have been discussed as a possible source of severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Under experimental conditions, SARS-CoV-2 can remain
infectious on surfaces for several days. However, the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 detection on surfaces
in healthcare settings and the public is currently not known. A systematic literature review was
performed. On surfaces around COVID-19 cases in healthcare settings (42 studies), the SARS-CoV2 RNA detection rates mostly were between 0% and 27% (Ct values mostly > 30). Detection of
infectious SARS-CoV-2 was only successful in one of seven studies in 9.2% of 76 samples. Most of the
positive samples were obtained next to a patient with frequent sputum spitting during sampling.
Eight studies were found with data from public surfaces and RNA detection rates between 0% and
22.1% (Ct values mostly > 30). Detection of infectious virus was not attempted. Similar results
were found in samples from surfaces around confirmed COVID-19 cases in non-healthcare settings
(7 studies) and from personal protective equipment (10 studies). Therefore, it seems plausible to
assume that inanimate surfaces are not a relevant source for transmission of SARS-CoV-2. In public
settings, the associated risks of regular surface disinfection probably outweigh the expectable health
benefit
Biocidal Agents Used for Disinfection Can Enhance Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Species
(2018)
COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals Can Be a Source of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission—A Systematic Review
(2021)
Fundamental rights are probably given back earlier to COVID-19 vaccinated individuals
assuming that they cannot spread SARS-CoV-2 anymore. The objective of the study was to determine
if COVID-19 vaccinated individuals can still be the source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. PubMed
was searched for studies on 4 April 2021. All studies with original data on COVID-19 cases among
vaccinated individuals (phase III RCTs) and on viral load in the upper respiratory tract of vaccinated
macaques after a SARS-CoV-2 challenge were included. Symptomatic COVID-19 cases were found
in four trials among vaccinated participants although less frequently than among control subjects.
One study revealed asymptomatic COVID-19 cases in a similar frequency among 2.168 AZD1222-
vaccinated subjects (1.0%) compared to 2.223 control subjects (1.0%). In 15 studies with vaccinated
macaques, it was found that the load of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, subgenomic RNA and infectious virus
in the upper respiratory tract is variable. Sterilizing immunity was found in none of the animal
studies. Major limitations of the animal studies are that the SARS-CoV-2 challenge took place within
a few weeks of the final or only vaccine dose, that the viral challenge was often high and, in some
studies, administered by up to four routes. Based on current knowledge it seems clear that COVID-19
vaccinated individuals can still be the source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.