Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- biosphere reserves (3) (remove)
Institute
Mind the gap: Information gaps and bridging options in assessing in-situ conservation achievements
(2008)
The biodiversity crisis has gained political attention on a global level. The “2010 Target” of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims to significantly reduce the loss of biodiversity by 2010. In order to achieve this, a network of representative and effectively managed protected areas is to be established. The effectiveness of protected areas thus represents one indicator for progress towards the CBD’s 2010 Target. However, indicators require information. The present study, in a first step, reviews the availability of open access long-term ecological data for assessing protected area effectiveness. This review shows two parallel – though contradictory – phenomena: data overkill and data scarcity. While the number of online databases providing open access data on biodiversity has grown tremendously, no long-term ecological data for a larger set of protected areas can be openly accessed. Reasons for this data scarcity are discussed. Based on this lack of information, in a second step, a method to bridge information gaps through social science research is aspired. An innovative Conservation Success Framework is developed, which defines and relates conservation needs, conservation capacity and conservation actions, its three main components. The basic assumption is that conservation can only be successful where the conservation capacity exists that is required to implement the conservation actions determined by the conservation needs. The framework was used to develop open and closed questionnaires for application in two Mexican biosphere reserves, the Sierra Gorda and the Sierra de Manantlán. As "conservation success" is often immeasurable in protected areas in practice due to unspecific conservation objectives the term is for the case studies substituted by “conservation achievements”, i.e. clearly noticeable effects from conservation actions. Overall, almost 60 interviews were conducted with different stakeholder groups. The gained information is validated through social science research techniques, such as triangulation of perspectives and active and passive observation. Based on this, conservation needs are identified and conservation capacities summarised and discussed for both case study sites. Implemented conservation actions addressing identified conservation needs and conservation capacity constraints are then analysed. In addition, noticeable effects from conservation actions on the state of biodiversity at case study sites, i.e. the conservation achievements, are described. Where locally available, non-open access data (as opposing open access data) are used to verify the findings from the social science research. Identified conservation achievements at both case study sites are evident both from quantitative information (for example forest cover increase according to non-open access data) and qualitative information (for example perceived change in the occurrence of illegal activities according to interviews). In addition, rather “intangible” indicators that can only be revealed through qualitative surveys are identified for both sites. This study thus highlights the crucial importance of integrating different types of data, ecological and socio-economic, as well as quantitative and qualitative ones. The present study concludes with a series of recommendations 1) to local practitioners at the two case study sites, and 2) to the international conservation community. Local practitioners may benefit from the present study because its results provide for each site a) an overview of existing conservation needs and implemented conservation actions; b) an easy way to identify action gaps; c) a baseline to identify progress indicators; and d) an overview of diverse perspectives on the current effectiveness of the biosphere reserves. These benefits are considered of particular importance as they can be influential in the revision of the site’s management plans, which both are now approximately ten years old and will soon be revised. The international conservation community will not be able to make a clear statement in the year 2010 about the effectiveness of protected areas on a global level due to a lack of information and transparency. However, the year 2010 should not be considered an end point for measuring progress in in-situ conservation; instead protected area quality standards must be created, effectiveness evaluations institutionalised and efforts to foster regular reporting must continue. Consequently, a scheme of consolidated actions from local to national and international level is proposed that could help to sustainably bridge existing information gaps and close them on the long run. In the end, progress reporting on the effectiveness of protected areas, and other indicators, can only improve if different governance levels “mind the information gaps” in cooperation, until continued information gathering and sharing hopefully closes these gaps one day.
The dissertation aims at developing means to integrate conservation and development in biosphere reserves in Madagascar. Despite a multitude of concepts such as UNESCO biosphere reserves, Integrated Conservation and Development Projects and community-based natural resource management, gaps between conservation and development remain to exist. In a qualitative case study in Mananara-Nord and Sahamalaza Iles-Radama Biosphere Reserves in Madagascar data was collected on biosphere reserve management, local use of natural resources and socio-cultural aspects that influence natural resource use. Furthermore, natural values local people associate with the forest were investigated. Analysis revealed that management capacities constitute a limiting factor in biosphere reserve management. Collaboration between management, local people and international organisations fosters the achievement of both conservation and development. However, collaboration is only possible if (i) clear rules are formulated and (ii) partners have a vision in common. Based on the theory of social capital, newly introduced and locally existent rules/institutions having an influence on the use of natural resource were categorized in bonding, linking and bridging social capital. Furthermore, the perception of natural values was classified in instrumental and non-instrumental values and assigned to ecosystem services identifying the importance of nature for human well-being. With the capabilities approach Amartya Sen defined human well-being as the achievement of those capabilities a person considers valuable. This includes aspects that assure livelihoods on the one hand and aspects that are conducive to well-being on the other, thus both being relevant for development. In the dissertation capabilities are based on both instrumental and non-instrumental natural values and consequently offer an opportunity to demonstrate and characterise the relationship between nature and human well-being. Social and natural values provide orientation for a biosphere reserve management. The category bonding social capital (social values) describes local socio-cultural aspects in communities and their importance for collaborative processes. Natural values provide the management with guiding principles to foster nature conservation and to integrate locally existent capabilities. Supporting and furthering these capabilities enables the development of new capabilities of all concerned persons. The dissertation demonstrates various possibilities to build bridges between (i) nature conservation and development, (ii) natural and social sciences, (iii) formal regulations and local socio-cultural aspects and (iv) diverse actors. Implementation of a social monitoring is recommended together with local stewards and Malagasy students to collect information about the perception of natural and social values and use them as guiding principles for biosphere reserves. Collaboration with national and international scientific institutions can foster this process.
The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Programme has been active in South Africa for almost 20 years. The country currently has six designated biosphere reserves with a few sites in various stages of the nomination process. Within the South African context, agencies are using a series of seemingly different instruments to practice landscape-scale management. The UNESCO biosphere reserve concept sometimes finds it difficult to obtain prominence amongst these different landscape initiatives. Biosphere reserves are special sites wherein sustainable development is promoted. For this reason, the biosphere reserve concept has much to offer towards long-term sustainable socialecological land management. In our modern age of population growth, dwindling natural resources and a general disconnectedness of humans from nature due to large scale urbanization, there is an urgent need for innovative ways in which to showcase sustainable living practices. South Africa has limited natural, economic and social resources and therefore needs to prioritize where these resources could best be allocated. This dissertation comprises the history of the MAB Programme in South Africa, as well as a multicase study on five existing biosphere reserves. Results from this study indicated that not all biosphere reserves are equally effective in their implementation of the three functions of biosphere reserves and that all biosphere reserves in South Africa face an uncertain future due to pressing challenges. Collective results of the multicase study as well as literature reviews were used to inform options for the future effective implementation of the MAB Programme in South Africa. Options that could contribute towards effective biosphere reserves include more sustainable funding support, and community-based demonstration projects. In addition a new suite of criteria to inform the selection of future biosphere reserves was developed. Biosphere reserves need to be optimally located in order to secure long-term efficiency and effectiveness. These sites need to be representative of biodiversity, efficiently managed and persistent in the long run. Presently in South Africa, new sites for biosphere reserves are nominated in an ad hoc manner. Should their locations be selected discerningly, they offer many benefits to the South African social and environmental landscape that should be recognized and utilized. The final suite of selection criteria are structured according to four subsections, namely a general section that addresses national matters of general concern to the MAB Programme, and three sections covering the three biosphere reserve functions of conservation, sustainable development and logistic support. This suite of biosphere reserve selection criteria for South Africa is being put forward for deliberation and discussion at local, provincial and national level. It has the potential to be of valuable assistance in selection processes for future effective and efficient biosphere reserves that will proudly earn their place in the South African landscape as “special places for people and nature”.