Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- - (2)
- CT (1)
- MRI (1)
- children (1)
- diagnostics (1)
- emergency imaging (1)
- maxillofacial (1)
- orbital soft tissue injury (1)
- orbital trauma (1)
- polytrauma (1)
- project report (1)
- quality assurance (1)
- sub-specialization (1)
- subspecialization (1)
- teleradiology (1)
- trauma (1)
Institute
Publisher
- MDPI (3)
: Background: High-impact trauma frequently leads to injuries of the orbit, but literature
focusing on the viscerocranium rather than the neurocranium is underrepresented. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2006–2014) at an urban level 1 trauma center assessing the frequency and
typical patterns of orbital injuries on whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) with maxillofacial
multi-slice CT (MSCT) after severe trauma. (1) Screening of consecutive WBCT cases for dedicated
maxillofacial MSCT. (2) Examination by two independent experts’ radiologists for (peri-/)orbital
injuries. (3) Case review for trauma mechanisms. Results: 1061 WBCT were included revealing 250
(23.6%) patients with orbital injuries. Less than one-quarter (23.3%) of patients showed osseous
and 9.5% showed soft tissue injuries. Combined osseous and soft tissue lesions were present in
39.2% of orbital injuries, isolated soft tissue injuries were rare. Single- or two-wall fractures of the
orbit were prevalent, and the orbital floor was affected in 67% of fractures. Dislocated extraocular
muscles (44.6%), deformation of the ocular globe (23.8%), and elongation of the optic nerve (12.9%)
were the most frequently soft tissue findings. Vascular trauma was suspected in 15.8% of patients.
Conclusions: Orbital trauma was confirmed in 23.6% of cases with suspected facial injuries after severe
trauma. Concomitant soft tissue injuries should be excluded explicitly in cases with orbital fractures
to prevent loss of vision or ocular motility.
Background: The current literature discusses aspects of quality assurance (QA) and sub-specialization. However, the challenges of these topics in a teleradiology network have been less explored. In a project report, we aimed to review the development and enforcement of sub-specialized radiology at Telemedicine Clinic (TMC), one of the largest teleradiology providers in Europe, and to describe each step of its QA. Evaluation: The company-specific background was provided by the co-authors—current and former staff members of TMC. Detailed descriptions of the structures of sub-specialization and QA at TMC are provided. Exemplary quantitative evaluation of caseloads and disagreement rates of secondary reviews are illustrated. Description of Sub-specialization and Quality Assurance at TMC: Sub-specialization at TMC is divided into musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, head and neck, a body, and an emergency section operating at local daytime in Europe and Australia. Quality assurance is based on a strict selection process of radiologists, specific reporting guidelines, feedback through the secondary reading of 100% of all radiology reports for new starters, and a minimum of 5% of radiology reports on a continuous basis for all other radiologists, knowledge sharing activities and ongoing training. The level of sub-specialization of each radiologist is monitored continuously on an individual basis in detail. After prospective secondary readings, the mean disagreement rate at TMC indicating at least possibly clinically relevant findings was 4% in 2021. Conclusion: With continuing and current developments in radiology in mind, the essential features of sub-specialization and innovative QA are relevant for further expansion of teleradiology services and for most radiology departments worldwide to respond to the increasing demand for value-based radiology.
Although serious accidents remain the leading cause of pediatric mortality, protocols to orient diagnostic procedures towards a certain type of initial imaging are widely needed. Since 2007, we have performed whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMR) and whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for diagnoses of severely injured children. We retrospectively reviewed 134 WBMR and 158 WBCT in patients younger than 16 years that were performed at two trauma centers between 2007 and 2018. A higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) was found in WBCT vs. WBMR (10.6 vs. 5.8; p = 0.001), but without any significant difference in mortality. The WBMR was significantly preferred at younger ages (9.6 vs. 12.8 years; p < 0.001). The time between patient’s arrival until diagnosis was 2.5 times longer for WBCT (92.1 vs. 37.1 min; p < 0.001). More patients in the CT group received analgesic sedation and/or intubation at 37.3% vs. 21.6% in the MRI group. Of these patients, 86.4% (CT) and 27.6% (MRI) were already preclinically sedated (p < 0.001). Correspondingly, 72.4% of the patients were first sedated in-hospital for MRIs. In conclusion, WBMR is an alternative and radiation-free imaging method for high-energy-traumatized children. Although the selected diagnostics seemed appropriate, limitations regarding longer duration or additional analgesic sedation are present, and further studies are needed.