Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (1)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Keywords
- behavior (1)
- brain (1)
- central nervous system (1)
- lifestyle (1)
- plasticity (1)
Institute
Foraging behavior, neuroanatomy and neuroplasticity in cursorial and stationary hunting spiders
(2023)
The central nervous system (CNS) is the integration center for the coordination and regulation of
all body activities of animals and the source of behavioral patterns, behavioral plasticity and
personality. Understanding the anatomy and the potential for plastic changes of the CNS not only
widens the knowledge on the biology of the respective species, but also enables a more
fundamental understanding of behavioral and ecological patterns. The CNS of species with
different sensory ecologies for example, will show specific differences in the wiring of their CNS,
related to their lifestyle. Spiders are a group of mesopredators that include stationary hunting
species that build webs for prey capture, and cursorial hunting species that do not build capture
webs. These distinct lifestyles are associated with major differences in their sensory equipment,
such as size of the different eyes.
In this thesis, I aimed to answer if a cursorial mesopredator would change its behavior due to
different levels of perceived predation risk, and if this behavior would be influenced by individual
differences (chapter 1); how the visual pathways in the brain of the cursorial hunting jumping
spider Marpissa muscosa differs from that of the nocturnal cursorial hunting wandering spider
Cupiennius salei (chapter 2); to what degree the visual systems of stationary and cursorial hunting
spiders differ and whether CNS areas that process vibratory information show similar differences
(chapter 3); and finally if the CNS in stationary and cursorial hunting spiders shows different
patterns of neuroplasticity in response to sensory input and deprivation during development
(chapter 4).
In chapter 1, I found that jumping spiders adjust their foraging behavior to the perceived level of
risk. By favoring a dark over a light substrate, they displayed a background-matching strategy.
Short pulses of acute risk, produced by simulated bird overflights, had only small effects on the
behavior. Instead, a large degree of variation in behavior was due to among-individual differences
in foraging intensity. These covaried with consistent among-individual differences in activity,
forming a behavioral syndrome. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent amongindividual
differences in the behavior of animals that forage under risk. Future studies should
address the mechanisms underlying these stable differences, as well as potential fitness
consequences that may influence food-web dynamics.
In chapter 2, I found that the visual pathways in the brain of the jumping spider M. muscosa differ
from that in the wandering spider C. salei. While the pathway of the principal eyes, which are
responsible for object discrimination, is the same in both species, considerable differences occur
in the pathway of the secondary eyes, which detect movement. Notably, M. muscosa possesses
an additional second-order visual neuropil, which is integrating information from two different
secondary eyes, and may enable faster movement decisions. I also showed that the tiny posterior
median eye is connected to a first-order visual neuropil which in turn connects to the arcuate body
(a higher-order neuropil), and is thus not vestigial as suggested before. Subsequent studies should
focus on exploring the function of the posterior median eyes in different jumping spider species,
Foraging behavior, neuroanatomy, and neuroplasticity in cursorial and stationary hunting spiders
as they show considerable inter-specific size differences that may be correlated with a differing
connectivity in the brain.
In chapter 3, I described all neuropils and major tracts in the CNS of two stationary (Argiope
bruennichi and Parasteatoda tepidariorum) and two cursorial hunting spiders (Pardosa amentata
and M. muscosa). I found major differences in the visual systems of the secondary eyes between
cursorial and stationary hunting spiders, but also within the groups. A. bruennichi has specialized
retinula cells in two of the secondary eyes, which connect to different higher-order neuropils. P.
tepidariorum has only a single visual neuropil connected to all secondary eyes, and lacks
recognizable mushroom bodies. The neuroanatomy of CNS areas that process mechanosensory
information on the other hand, is remarkably similar between cursorial and stationary hunting
species. This suggests that the same major circuits are used for the processing of mechanosensory
information in both cursorial and stationary hunting spiders. Future studies on functional aspects
of sensory processing in spiders can build on the findings of our study.
In chapter 4, I found that developmental neuroplasticity in response to sensory input differs
between a cursorial (M. muscosa) and a stationary hunting spider (P. tepidariorum). While
deprivation of sensory input leads to a volume increase in several visual and mechanosensory
neuropils M. muscosa, neither sensory deprivation nor sensory enrichment had an effect on the
volume of neuropils in P. tepidariorum. However, exposure to mechanical cues during
development had an effect on the allometric scaling slope of the leg neuropils in both M. muscosa
and P. tepidariorum. Future studies should focus on the genetic and cellular basis of
developmental neuroplasticity in response to sensory input in order to explain the observed
patterns.