Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- brain tumor (3) (remove)
Institute
Abstract
Nervous system development has been intensely studied in insects (especially Drosophila melanogaster), providing detailed insights into the genetic regulatory network governing the formation and maintenance of the neural stem cells (neuroblasts) and the differentiation of their progeny. Despite notable advances over the last two decades, neurogenesis in other arthropod groups remains by comparison less well understood, hampering finer resolution of evolutionary cell type transformations and changes in the genetic regulatory network in some branches of the arthropod tree of life. Although the neurogenic cellular machinery in malacostracan crustaceans is well described morphologically, its genetic molecular characterization is pending. To address this, we established an in situ hybridization protocol for the crayfish Procambarus virginalis and studied embryonic expression patterns of a suite of key genes, encompassing three SoxB group transcription factors, two achaete–scute homologs, a Snail family member, the differentiation determinants Prospero and Brain tumor, and the neuron marker Elav. We document cell type expression patterns with notable similarities to insects and branchiopod crustaceans, lending further support to the homology of hexapod–crustacean neuroblasts and their cell lineages. Remarkably, in the crayfish head region, cell emigration from the neuroectoderm coupled with gene expression data points to a neuroblast‐independent initial phase of brain neurogenesis. Further, SoxB group expression patterns suggest an involvement of Dichaete in segmentation, in concordance with insects. Our target gene set is a promising starting point for further embryonic studies, as well as for the molecular genetic characterization of subregions and cell types in the neurogenic systems in the adult crayfish brain.
The utilization of fluorescein-guided biopsies has recently been discussed to improve and expedite operative techniques in the detection of tumor-positive tissue, as well as to avoid making sampling errors. In this study, we aimed to report our experience with fluorescein-guided biopsies and elucidate distribution patterns in different histopathological diagnoses in order to develop strategies to increase the efficiency and accuracy of this technique. We report on 45 fluorescence-guided stereotactic biopsies in 44 patients (15 female, 29 male) at our institution from March 2016 to March 2021, including 25 frame-based stereotactic biopsies and 20 frameless image-guided biopsies using VarioGuide®. A total number of 347 biopsy samples with a median of 8 samples (range: 4–18) per patient were evaluated for intraoperative fluorescein uptake and correlated to definitive histopathology. The median age at surgery was 63 years (range: 18–87). Of the acquired specimens, 63% were fluorescein positive. Final histopathology included glioblastoma (n = 16), B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), astrocytoma, IDH-mutant WHO grade III (n = 6), astrocytoma, IDH-mutant WHO grade II (n = 1), oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted WHO grade II (n = 2), reactive CNS tissue/inflammation (n = 4), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD; n = 2), ependymoma (n = 1), infection (toxoplasmosis; n = 1), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), and metastasis (n = 1). The sensitivity for high-grade gliomas was 85%, and the specificity was 70%. For contrast-enhancing lesions, the specificity of fluorescein was 84%. The number needed to sample for contrast-enhancing lesions was three, and the overall number needed to sample for final histopathological diagnosis was five. Interestingly, in the astrocytoma, IDH-mutant WHO grade III group, 22/46 (48%) demonstrated fluorescein uptake despite no evidence for gadolinium uptake, and 73% of these were tumor-positive. In our patient series, fluorescein-guided stereotactic biopsy increases the likelihood of definitive neuropathological diagnosis, and the number needed to sample can be reduced by 50% in contrast-enhancing lesions.
Gas Plasma Exposure of Glioblastoma Is Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory in Patient-Derived GBM Tissue
(2022)
Simple Summary
Despite treatment advances, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains an often-fatal disease, motivating novel therapeutic avenues. Gas plasma is a technology that has been recently employed in preclinical oncology research and acts primarily via reactive oxygen-species-induced cell death. In addition, the modulation of immune processes and inflammation have been ascribed to gas plasma exposure. This is the first study that extends those observations from in vitro investigations to a set of 16 patient-derived GBM tumor biopsies analyzed after gas plasma treatment ex vivo. Besides cell culture results showing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction, an immunomodulatory potential was identified for gas plasma exposure in vitro and cultured GBM tissues. The proapoptotic action shown in this study might be an important step forward to the first clinical observational studies on the future discovery of gas plasma technology’s potential in neurosurgery and neuro-oncology.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant adult brain tumor. Therapeutic options for glioblastoma are maximal surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Therapy resistance and tumor recurrence demand, however, new strategies. Several experimental studies have suggested gas plasma technology, a partially ionized gas that generates a potent mixture of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as a future complement to the existing treatment arsenal. However, aspects such as immunomodulation, inflammatory consequences, and feasibility studies using GBM tissue have not been addressed so far. In vitro, gas plasma generated ROS that oxidized cells and led to a treatment time-dependent metabolic activity decline and G2 cell cycle arrest. In addition, peripheral blood-derived monocytes were co-cultured with glioblastoma cells, and immunomodulatory surface expression markers and cytokine release were screened. Gas plasma treatment of either cell type, for instance, decreased the expression of the M2-macrophage marker CD163 and the tolerogenic molecule SIGLEC1 (CD169). In patient-derived GBM tissue samples exposed to the plasma jet kINPen ex vivo, apoptosis was significantly increased. Quantitative chemokine/cytokine release screening revealed gas plasma exposure to significantly decrease 5 out of 11 tested chemokines and cytokines, namely IL-6, TGF-β, sTREM-2, b-NGF, and TNF-α involved in GBM apoptosis and immunomodulation. In summary, the immuno-modulatory and proapoptotic action shown in this study might be an important step forward to first clinical observational studies on the future discovery of gas plasma technology’s potential in neurosurgery and neuro-oncology especially in putative adjuvant or combinatory GBM treatment settings.