Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Grand Societal Challenges (2) (remove)
Institute
The dissertation looks at bioeconomy innovation at different levels through the lens of economic geography. By progressing from the meta to the micro-scale, it tries to find answers to how the interrelated concepts of bioeconomy and innovation are embedded in these respective contexts while consecutively concretising bioeconomy and de-fuzzing it. To do that, it adopts a mixed-methods approach that starts general and ends specific, going from the meta-scale of literature over the macro-scale of three distinct areas in which bioeconomy is discussed to the meso-level of central actors of a European funding network before, lastly, considering case studies at the micro-scale. Throughout, the thesis aims to spatialise the bioeconomy by shedding light on the term and its drivers across multiple geographic layers. It thereby not only offers new insights into dimensions of innovation in the bioeconomy but also contributes to the discipline of economic geography by applying some of its essential theoretical ideas to an emerging political framework.
This work scrutinises the policy shift in Germany with the change in leitmotif from biotechnology to bioeconomy and examines the associated implications at various levels. The emergence and implementation of innovation policy funding programmes show that the policy transition did not follow a linear sequence. Neither excessive prioritisation nor neglect of a selected sector can be confirmed in this analysis. However, the policy shift from biotechnology to bioeconomy has not only consequences in terms of its content, but also affects the spatial distribution of R&D funding. Against the background of existing polarisation tendencies and the growing acknowledgement of inclusive innovation policy approaches, this study examines the importance the bioeconomy can assume in the reduction of regional disparities. In ‘organisationally thick’ regions, depending on the involvement of private actors, specialisation and regional branching can be observed. It is found that, for rural regions, the bioeconomy can be an appropriate tool for regional development, since other industries are often not present.