Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- reactive oxygen species (3) (remove)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (3) (remove)
Cold physical plasma (CPP) technology is of high promise for various medical applications.
The interplay of specific components of physical plasma with living cells, tissues and organs on a structural and functional level is of paramount interest with the aim to induce therapeutic effects in a controlled and replicable fashion.
In contrast to other medical disciplines such as dermatology and oromaxillofacial surgery, research reports on CPP application in orthopaedics are scarce.
The present implementation of CPP in orthopaedics involves surface modifications of orthopaedic materials and biomaterials to optimize osseointegration. In addition, the influence of CPP on musculoskeletal cells and tissues is a focus of research, including possible adverse reactions and side effects. Its bactericidal aspects make CPP an attractive supplement to current treatment regimens in case of microbial inflammations such as periprosthetic joint infections. Attributed anticancerogenic and pro-apoptotic effects underline the clinical relevance of CPP as an additive in treating malignant bone lesions.
The present review outlines ongoing research in orthopaedics involving CPP; it distinguishes considerations for safe application and the need for more evidence-based research to facilitate robust clinical implementation.
Background: The use of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) in oncology has been intensively investigated over the past 15 years as it inhibits the growth of many tumor cells. It is known that reactive oxidative species (ROS) produced in CAP are responsible for this effect. However, to translate the use of CAP into medical practice, it is essential to know how CAP treatment affects non-malignant cells. Thus, the current in vitro study deals with the effect of CAP on human bone cancer cells and human osteoblasts. Here, identical CAP treatment regimens were applied to the malignant and non-malignant bone cells and their impact was compared. Methods: Two different human bone cancer cell types, U2-OS (osteosarcoma) and A673 (Ewing’s sarcoma), and non-malignant primary osteoblasts (HOB) were used. The CAP treatment was performed with the clinically approved kINPen MED. After CAP treatment, growth kinetics and a viability assay were performed. For detecting apoptosis, a caspase-3/7 assay and a TUNEL assay were used. Accumulated ROS was measured in cell culture medium and intracellular. To investigate the influence of CAP on cell motility, a scratch assay was carried out. Results: The CAP treatment showed strong inhibition of cell growth and viability in bone cancer cells. Apoptotic processes were enhanced in the malignant cells. Osteoblasts showed a higher potential for ROS resistance in comparison to malignant cells. There was no difference in cell motility between benign and malignant cells following CAP treatment. Conclusions: Osteoblasts show better tolerance to CAP treatment, indicated by less affected viability compared to CAP-treated bone cancer cells. This points toward the selective effect of CAP on sarcoma cells and represents a further step toward the clinical application of CAP.
Cold physical plasma (CPP), a partially ionized gas that simultaneously generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, is suggested to provide advantages in regenerative medicine. Intraoperative CPP therapy targeting pathologies related to diminished bone quality could be promising in orthopedic surgery. Assessment of a clinically approved plasma jet regarding cellular effects on primary bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (hBM-MSCs) from relevant arthroplasty patient cohorts is needed to establish CPP-based therapeutic approaches for bone regeneration. Thus, the aim of this study was to derive biocompatible doses of CPP and subsequent evaluation of human primary hBM-MSCs’ osteogenic and immunomodulatory potential. Metabolic activity and cell proliferation were affected in a treatment-time-dependent manner. Morphometric high content imaging analyses revealed a decline in mitochondria and nuclei content and increased cytoskeletal compactness following CPP exposure. Employing a nontoxic exposure regime, investigation on osteogenic differentiation did not enhance osteogenic capacity of hBM-MSCs. Multiplex analysis of major hBM-MSC cytokines, chemokines and growth factors revealed an anti-inflammatory, promatrix-assembling and osteoclast-regulating secretion profile following CPP treatment and osteogenic stimulus. This study can be noted as the first in vitro study addressing the influence of CPP on hBM-MSCs from individual donors of an arthroplasty clientele.