Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Depression (3) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Psychologie (3) (remove)
Publisher
- BioMed Central (BMC) (1)
- S. Karger AG (1)
Background
Only about half the people with depression seek professional health care services. To constitute the different predictors and associating variables of health care utilisation, we model the process and aim to test our hypothesised Seeking Mental Health Care Model. The model includes empirical influences on the help-seeking process to predict actual behaviour and incorporates superordinate (stigma, treatment experiences) as well as intermediate attitudinal variables (continuum and causal beliefs, depression literacy and self-efficacy).
Method
All variables are examined in an online study (baseline, three- and six-month follow-up). The sample consisted of adults with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 sum score ≥ 8), currently not receiving mental health care treatment. To examine the prediction of variables explaining help-seeking behaviour, a path model analysis was carried out (lavaan package, software R).
Results
Altogether, 1368 participants (Mage = 42.38, SDage = 15.22, 65.6% female) were included, 983 participating in at least one follow-up. Model fit was excellent (i.e., RMSEA = 0.059, CFI = 0.989), and the model confirmed most of the hypothesised predictions. Intermediary variables were significantly associated with stigma and experiences. Depression literacy (ß = .28), continuum beliefs (ß = .11) and openness to a balanced biopsychosocial causal model (ß = .21) significantly influenced self-identification (R2 = .35), which among the causal beliefs and self-efficacy influenced help-seeking intention (R2 = .10). Intention (ß = .40) prospectively predicted help-seeking behaviour (R2 = .16).
Conclusion
The Seeking Mental Health Care Model provides an empirically validated conceptualisation of the help-seeking process of people with untreated depressive symptoms as a comprehensive approach considering internal influences. Implications and open questions are discussed, e.g., regarding differentiated assessment of self-efficacy, usefulness of continuum beliefs and causal beliefs in anti-stigma work, and replication of the model for other mental illnesses.
Trial registration
German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00023557. Registered 11 December 2020. World Health Organization, Universal Trial Number: U1111–1264-9954. Registered 16 February 2021.
Background: Controversy surrounds the questions whether co-occurring depression has negative effects on cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes in patients with panic disorder (PD) and agoraphobia (AG) and whether treatment for PD and AG (PD/AG) also reduces depressive symptomatology. Methods: Post-hoc analyses of randomized clinical trial data of 369 outpatients with primary PD/AG (DSM-IV-TR criteria) treated with a 12-session manualized CBT (n = 301) and a waitlist control group (n = 68). Patients with comorbid depression (DSM-IV-TR major depression, dysthymia, or both: 43.2% CBT, 42.7% controls) were compared to patients without depression regarding anxiety and depression outcomes (Clinical Global Impression Scale [CGI], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A], number of panic attacks, Mobility Inventory [MI], Panic and Agoraphobia Scale, Beck Depression Inventory) at post-treatment and follow-up (categorical). Further, the role of severity of depressive symptoms on anxiety/depression outcome measures was examined (dimensional). Results: Comorbid depression did not have a significant overall effect on anxiety outcomes at post-treatment and follow-up, except for slightly diminished post-treatment effect sizes for clinician-rated CGI (p = 0.03) and HAM-A (p = 0.008) when adjusting for baseline anxiety severity. In the dimensional model, higher baseline depression scores were associated with lower effect sizes at post-treatment (except for MI), but not at follow-up (except for HAM-A). Depressive symptoms improved irrespective of the presence of depression. Conclusions: Exposure-based CBT for primary PD/AG effectively reduces anxiety and depressive symptoms, irrespective of comorbid depression or depressive symptomatology.
A paradigm was developed to experimentally investigate the dysregulation of affective reactivity in clinical depression. The literature so far reported evidence for three directions of dysregulation - negative potentiation, positive attenuation, and emotion context insensitivity. Therefore a paradigm was designed to allow to test all three hypotheses simultaneously. Furthermore, to enable generalization across the specific stimuli used in the experiment, stimuli of two sensory modalities were used - pictures and sounds. Because it was hypothesized, that the specificity of affective reactivity of depressed patients will be especially prominent in long lasting affective situations, a categorically blocked presentation mode was chosen. Regarding the dependent variables, a multimethod approach was conducted. Besides self-report ratings of the feeling state, startle responses, skin conductance responses, heart rate, and the electromyogram of the corrugator and zygomatic muscle were recorded. In a separate session, BOLD-responses during picture viewing were collected by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Both sessions were conducted with three samples: a healthy student sample, a depressed outpatient sample, and a healthy age and gender matched control sample. The results of the patient sample support an integration of the emotion context insensitivity and the negative potentiation hypothesis. Patients reported generally to feel more unpleasant and more aroused than healthy controls. Skin conductance and startle responses were modulated by valence to a smaller degree in the patients than in the controls. No group differences were found in the facial muscle activity. BOLD-responses were potentiated during unpleasant compared to neutral pictures in the patient but not in the control group in the amygdala, the insular cortex and the orbito frontal cortex. A model to integrate these results is developed. Its central assumption is, that the inability to respond to affective stimuli is an aversive experience and therefore leads to a negativity bias in attention and cognition. Direction of further research and implications for psychotherapies are discussed.