Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- deployment (3) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
- Wiley (2)
Aims
To investigate factors that influence the willingness of inactive nurses to return to nursing in a crisis situation and to identify aspects that need to be considered with regard to a possible deployment.
Design
A deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis of semi-structured focus group interviews.
Methods
Semi-structured focus group interviews with inactive or marginally employed nurses, nurses who have been inactive for some time and nursing home managers in October and November 2021. The participating inactive nurses had declared their willingness for a deployment during the COVID-19 pandemic or not. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
Communication was seen as essential by the participants for an informed decision for or against a temporary return to nursing and to potential or actual deployments. To make them feel safe, inactive nurses need to know what to expect and what is expected of them, for example, regarding required training and responsibilities. Considering their current employment status, some flexibility in terms of deployment conditions is needed.
A remaining attachment to care can trigger a sense of duty. Knowledge of (regular) working conditions in nursing can lead to both a desire to support former colleagues and a refusal to be exposed to these conditions again.
Conclusion
Past working experiences and the current employment situation play a major role in the willingness of inactive nurses to return to nursing in a crisis situation. Unbureaucratic arrangements must be provided for those who are willing to return.
Summary Statement
What already is known - In crisis situations, not every inactive nurse is willing or able to return to nursing and therefore, the ‘silent reserve’ may not be as large as suspected.
What this paper adds - Inactive nurses need to know what to expect and what is expected of them for their decision regarding a return to active patient care during a crisis situation.
Implications for practice/policy – Inactive nurses need to be informed and should be offered free training and refresher courses to ensure patient safety.
Impact
This research shows that the group of inactive nurses are not a silent workforce which can be activated anytime. Those who are able and willing to return to direct patient care in crisis situations need the best possible support – during and between crises.
Reporting Method
This study adhered to COREQ guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution
The involvement of patients or members of the public did not apply for the study, as the aim was to gain insight into the motivations and attitudes of the group of inactive nurses.
An already existing shortage of nurses was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Inactive (former) nurses were regarded as a so-called silent reserve and were called upon by various agencies to volunteer for nursing. The question arose as to what factors might encourage or hinder such volunteering and facilitate deployment.
First, inactive nurses were asked via an online survey whether they had registered for deployment or not and what the reasons were for this decision. Further information on professional background was collected, including the reason for having left the profession in the first place. Based on the results of the online survey, focus group discussions were conducted with registered and unregistered inactive nurses, with nurses who had returned to the profession permanently, and with care home managers.
Only one third of the participants in the online survey said they had registered for a temporary assignment during the pandemic. The main reasons for registering were that inactive nurses ‘wanted to do their bit’ to manage the crisis, felt it was their duty and/or felt a sense of belonging to the nursing profession. The main reasons given for not having registered was that respondents ‘could not see a reason at the moment’, had health concerns, and ‘other relevant job commitments’. The majority of respondents still had jobs related to health, care or nursing.
The topics covered in the focus group discussions included the following: perception of the pandemic as a crisis, identity as a nurse and sense of professional commitment, role of current occupation in the decision to register, winning over inactive nurses with a very negative attitude towards returning to care during a crisis situation, support measures and offers regarding a deployment in nursing.
Both in the online survey and in the focus group discussions, a sense of belonging to the nursing profession was evident among many participants. However, this identity does not necessarily lead to a willingness to return to nursing during a crisis situation. Weighing up the risk of deployment against the positive or negative experiences gained during the active period can influence willingness. However, the possibility of taking a break from current work and returning to nursing at short notice is not always given. Many inactive nurses continue to work in the health sector and fulfil equally important tasks during a crisis situation which render them unavailable for deployment.
Different kinds of support for those willing to return to nursing during a crisis situation and communication on conditions of deployments need to be implemented and continuously improved to offer the inactive nurses the greatest possible security and to enable a largely unbureaucratic deployment.
Aims
To examine whether inactive nurses are willing to return to nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the reasons for or against their decision and further, possibly relevant factors.
Design
Cross-sectional online survey.
Methods
We developed a questionnaire, addressing registration, professional experiences, anticipations, and internal and external factors that might affect the decision of inactive nurses to return to nursing during the pandemic. Between 27 April and 15 June 2020, we recruited participants in Germany via social networks, organizations and institutions and asked them to forward the link to wherever other inactive nurses might be reached.
Results
Three hundred and thirty-two participants (73% female) could be included in the analysis. The majority of the participants (n = 262, 79%) were general nurses. The main reason for registering was ‘want to do my bit to manage the crisis’ (n = 73, 22.8%). More than two thirds of the participants (n = 230, 69%) were not or not yet registered. One hundred and twelve (49%) out of 220 participants, who gave reasons why they did not register, selected they ‘could not see a necessity at that time’. The few inactive nurses who were deployed reported a variety of experiences.
Conclusions
Different factors influence the nurses’ decision to register or not. A critical factor for their decision was previous experiences that had made them leave the job and prevented a return—even for a limited time in a special situation.
Impact
From the responses of the participants in this study, it can be deduced that: negative experiences made while working in nursing influence the willingness to volunteer for a deployment; only one-third of the inactive nurses would be willing to return to the nursing profession to help manage the Corona pandemic; policymakers and nursing leaders should not rely on the availability of inactive nurses in a crisis.