Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Dementia (4) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is likely to be the second-most common cause of dementia in individuals under 65 years of age. Pathognomonic changes in personality, behavior and motivation are known to lead to high caregiver stress and burden, with little support being available. The aim of this work is to present the current state of knowledge on the characteristics, challenges and unmet needs of caregivers as well as on possible interventions.
Two scoping reviews on caregiver burden using the PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews were conducted using PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect in April 2017 and November 2019, respectively. A total of 107 articles were considered eligible and were analyzed qualitatively and summarized.
Our results show that caregivers of patients with FTLD are often female, spouses of the PwD, younger in age, have underage children and provide care at home. Behavioral and motivational disturbances in the PwD are perceived to be the most burdensome aspects of caregiving. Those caring for an individual with the bvFTD subtype thus report higher levels of burden than caregivers of an individual with a form of PPA. With rising dementia severity, caregivers report higher levels of burden. Many caregivers experience a decline in their own physical and mental health as well as a significant financial burden resulting from care duties. The deterioration of the relationship between the PwD and their caregivers is a main burdensome aspect. Only few interventions were conducted so far, and none of those that were identified were designed as an RCT. The most efficacious interventions were those aimed directly at caregivers, whereas interventions aiming at the amelioration of symptoms in the PwD showed little effect.
Further research should reproduce and validate efficacious interventions and establish new interventional approaches. Another focus should be set on the situation of underage children of individuals with FTLD and relatives of a person with hereditary FTD. More research from non-Western countries is needed in order to identify culture-specific factors of caregiver burden. Along those lines, support structures for FTLD caregivers should be assessed on a local basis and extended accordingly. So far, no study has assessed the relationship between caregiver burden and possible consequences for the quality of care provided to the PwD in FTLD specifically. Awareness both in the wider population and among healthcare professionals is an urgent need for the future since FTLD is often misdiagnosed, leading to a delay in obtaining the correct diagnosis and access to suitable support.
Background
A redistribution of tasks between specialized nurses and primary care physicians, i.e., models of advanced nursing practice, has the potential to improve the treatment and care of the growing number of people with dementia (PwD). Especially in rural areas with limited access to primary care physicians and specialists, these models might improve PwD’s quality of life and well-being. However, such care models are not available in Germany in regular healthcare. This study examines the acceptance, safety, efficacy, and health economic efficiency of an advanced nursing practice model for PwD in the primary care setting in Germany.
Methods
InDePendent is a two-arm, multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled intervention study. Inclusion criteria are age ≥70 years, cognitively impaired (DemTect ≤8) or formally diagnosed with dementia, and living in the own home. Patients will be recruited by general practitioners or specialists. Randomization is carried out at the physicians’ level in a ratio of 1:2 (intervention vs. waiting-control group). After study inclusion, all participants will receive a baseline assessment and a follow-up assessment after 6 months. Patients of the intervention group will receive advanced dementia care management for 6 months, carried out by specialized nurses, who will conduct certain tasks, usually carried out by primary care physicians. This includes a standardized assessment of the patients’ unmet needs, the generation and implementation of an individualized care plan to address the patients’ needs in close coordination with the GP. PwD in the waiting-control group will receive routine care for 6 months and subsequently become part of the intervention group. The primary outcome is the number of unmet needs after 6 months measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE). The primary analysis after 6 months is carried out using multilevel models and will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, caregiver burden, acceptance, and cost-effectiveness. In total, n=465 participants are needed to assess significant differences in the number of unmet needs between the intervention and control groups.
Discussion
The study will provide evidence about the acceptance, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of an innovative interprofessional concept based on advanced nursing care. Results will contribute to the implementation of such models in the German healthcare system. The goal is to improve the current treatment and care situation for PwD and their caregivers and to expand nursing roles.
Background & Aim: Person-Centered-Care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. Among People living with Dementia (PlwD) only limited evidence about patient preferences, more specifically quantitative preferences, is available. Additionally, data on congruence of patient preferences with physicians’ judgements are missing. Information on patient preferences and their congruence with physicians’ judgements is expected to support Shared Decision-Making and respectively support the implementation of PCC in dementia. The aim of this dissertation was to analyze patient preferences and physicians’ judgements for PCC, including an assessment of their congruence, based on data from the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study. (Funding: Doctoral Scholarship from the Hans & Ilse Breuer-Stiftung.)
Methods: Development and conduct of a cross-sectional Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) survey with n=50 PlwD and n=25 physicians. Individual AHP-weights were calculated with the principal right eigenvector method and aggregated per group by Aggregation of Individual Priorities (AIP) mode. Individual consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated and aggregated per group. Group differences were analyzed descriptively by AIP-derived means and standard deviations of AHP-weights, resulting ranks, and boxplots. Additionally, differences between groups were investigated with independent paired t-tests or Mann Whitney-U tests. The sensitivity of AHP-results at the level of criteria was tested by an exclusion of inconsistent respondents in both groups, with an accepted threshold of the individual CR at ≤ 0.3 for PlwD and ≤ 0.2 for physicians.
Results: Contrary to expectation, PlwD’s and physician’s ranking of AHP-elements did not differ meaningfully. Memory Exercises was the only AHP-criterion, for which a significant difference in AHP-weights could be identified (p-value = 0.01). After inconsistent participants had been excluded, no rank reversals occurred. At the level of criteria, the mean CR for PlwD was 0.261 and 0.181 for physicians, id est (i.e.) below the
defined threshold.
Conclusion: In the selected study setting of the PreDemCare-study, patient preferences and physicians’ judgements for elements of PCC in dementia aligned well, contrary to expectations. Subject to restrictions by small sample sizes, the findings may form a basis to guide the implementation of preference-based, person-centered dementia care.
Background
Person-Centered-Care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. Among People-living-with-Dementia (PlwD) data on quantitative, choice-based preferences, which would allow to quantify, weigh and rank patient-relevant elements of dementia-care, and identify most/least preferred choices, are limited. The Analytic-Hierarchy-Process (AHP) may be one approach to elicit quantitative, choice-based preferences with PlwD, due to simple pairwise comparisons of individual criteria from a complex decision-problem, e.g. health care decisions. Furthermore, data on congruence of patient preferences with physicians’ judgements for PCC are missing. If patient preferences and physicians’ judgements differ, provision of PCC becomes unlikely. An understanding of patient preferences compared to physician’s judgements will support the implementation of truly PCC, i.e. state of the art dementia-care aligned with patient preferences.
Methods
This mixed-methods-study will be based on the results from a previous systematic review and conducted in three phases: (I) literature-based key intervention-categories of PCC will be investigated during qualitative interviews with Dementia-Care-Managers (DCMs) and PlwD to identify actually patient-relevant (sub) criteria of PCC; (II) based on findings from phase I, an AHP-survey will be designed and pre-tested for face- and content-validity, and consistency during face-to-face “thinking-aloud”-interviews with PlwD and two expert panels (DCMs and physicians); (III) the developed survey will elicit patient preferences and physicians’ judgements for PCC. To assess individual importance weights for (sub) criteria in both groups, the Principal-Eigenvector-Method will be applied. Weights will be aggregated per group by Aggregation-of-Individual-Priorities-mode. Descriptive and interferential statistical analyses will be conducted to assess congruence of importance-weights between groups. Subgroup-analyses shall investigate participant-heterogeneities, sensitivity of AHP-results shall be tested by inclusion/exclusion of inconsistent respondents.
Discussion
Little research is published on quantitative, choice-based preferences in dementia care. We expect that (1) PlwD have preferences and can express these, (2) that the AHP is a suitable technique to elicit quantitative, choice-based preferences among PlwD, and (3) to identify a divergence between patient preferences and physicians’ judgements for PCC. With the help of the AHP-technique, which supports systematic decision-making including multiple criteria, it may be possible to involve PlwD in future care decisions (patient participation) and ensure implementation of truly Person-Centered-Dementia-Care.
Trial registration
Approval of the study was granted by the Ethics Committee at the University Medicine Greifswald the 09Apr2021 (Reg.-Nr.: BB 018–21, BB 018-21a, BB 018-21b).